Muhamad Syahnakri
Universitas Pendidikan Nasional

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pengembangan Sentra Ekonomi Kreatif Berbasis Wilayah: Integrasi Pembiayaan, Pemasaran, dan Penguatan Kapasitas di Kabupaten Badung I Gusti Ngurah Widya Hadi Saputra; Desak Made Febri Purnama Sari; Putu Sri Arta Jaya Kusuma; I Gusti Ayu Agung Istri Dinda Larasshanti Jelantik; Ni Putu Dera Yanthi; Ni Nyoman Sri Wisudawati; Muhamad Syahnakri; Sang Ayu Made Dwi Riyanasari; I Gusti Ayu Ngurah Lita Rumiati
JOURNAL of APPLIED BUSINESS and BANKING (JABB) Vol 7, No 2 (2026): November
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH MATARAM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31764/jabb.v7i2.43733

Abstract

Ekonomi kreatif menjadi jalur strategis diversifikasi ekonomi daerah ketika budaya, pariwisata, dan ekonomi digital saling beririsan. Penelitian ini menganalisis pembiayaan, pemasaran-distribusi, serta pembinaan dan penguatan kapasitas dalam pengembangan sentra ekonomi kreatif di Kecamatan Abiansemal dan Kuta Utara, Kabupaten Badung. Desain mixed methods mengintegrasikan survei terhadap 40 pelaku ekonomi kreatif, wawancara mendalam dengan 10 perwakilan subsektor potensial, observasi lapangan, studi dokumentasi, dan FGD pentahelix yang melibatkan 15 peserta. Data kuantitatif dianalisis secara deskriptif dan dengan korelasi Spearman, sedangkan data kualitatif dikodekan secara tematik dan ditriangulasi antar-sumber. Pembinaan-penguatan kapasitas dan pemasaran-distribusi masing-masing memperoleh skor rata-rata 3,5, sedangkan pembiayaan 3,1. Ketiga aspek berkorelasi positif dan signifikan. Temuan kualitatif menunjukkan lintasan pengembangan yang berbeda: Abiansemal lebih kuat pada budaya, kriya, komunitas, dan sumber daya lokal, sedangkan Kuta Utara lebih terhubung dengan pariwisata, gaya hidup, desain, jasa kreatif, dan pasar digital. Temuan mendukung kebijakan ekosistem yang terintegrasi dengan implementasi berbasis karakter wilayah, serta menempatkan pembiayaan sebagai pengungkit lintas aspek yang terhubung dengan peningkatan kapasitas, digitalisasi, inovasi, perluasan pasar, dan jejaring.
Legal Protection of Overtime Workers’ Nutritional Rights under Indonesian Labor Law Komang Satria Wibawa Putra; Muhamad Syahnakri
Jurnal Ius Constituendum Vol. 12 No. 1 (2027): FEBRUARY
Publisher : Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jic.v12i1.14427

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the legal issues arising from employers’ obligations to provide food and beverages containing 1,400 kilocalories to overtime workers in Indonesia and the legal consequences of non-compliance. Previous worker law studies were primarily focused on overtime wages and other economic rights. Meanwhile, limited attention was given to overtime workers’ nutritional rights and the implementation of Article 29 of Government Regulation No. 35 of 2021. The implementation of Article 29 raised normative problems due to the absence of clear standards regarding the 1,400 kilocalorie requirement and weak supervisory mechanisms, creating legal uncertainty in the enforcement. Normative legal study was adopted using statutory and conceptual approaches. Legal materials consisted of legislation, literature, and scholarly journals analyzed descriptively and evaluatively. The results showed that providing food and beverages totaling 1,400 kilocalories constituted a mandatory requirement of overtime work and wages. This obligation could not be replaced with monetary compensation because workers’ health and energy were maintained during overtime work. Employers who failed to fulfil the obligation faced administrative sanctions and rights disputes before the Industrial Relations Court. Therefore, this study contributed to worker law scholarship by positioning workers’ nutritional rights as an integral component of occupational health protection and worker welfare. The novelty was in the analysis of the normative problems in implementing Article 29 of Government Regulation No. 35 of 2021 and the legal consequences arising from non-compliance with overtime workers’ nutritional rights.