Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

HUKUM PERBANKAN SYARIAH DI INDONESIA: Optimalisasi Fungsi Berbasis Pengendalian Risiko Pada Perbankan Syariah Rahmawati; Muh Asad Imaduddin; Jufrin; Muslimah
Wahana Islamika: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): Wahana Islamika: Jurnal Studi Keislaman
Publisher : STAI Syubbanul Wathon Magelang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61136/zskcz305

Abstract

After Law Number 21 of 2008, the government attempted to increase the resilience of sharia banking to potential risks that could occur at any time. The systemic impact resulting from failure to control risk is the main reason for implementing strict regulations in the banking industry. the impact caused by the failure to control risks, and the implementation of strict regulations on the banking industry, and looking at the government's actions in forming regulatory rules regarding sharia banking. Considering this research, we look at the rules made by the government. Why is the main reason for implementing strict regulations in the banking industry. The aim of this research is to determine the impact of failure to control risk by sharia banking, and the implementation of strict regulations in the banking industry. This research uses a descriptive-qualitative approach, with a type of library research, namely a type of research by collecting scientific papers as research objects or collecting data in the nature of a library study. The research results show that the Government needs to improve the regulatory and supervisory function of sharia banking in Indonesia. To optimize the function of sharia banking, the government must be able to control the risks that always frame sharia banking business activities.
Pengakuan Terdakwa dalam Proses Persidangan sebagai Alat Bukti: Confession of the Defendant in the Trial Process as Evidence Rospita Adelina Siregar; Muslimah; Hadibah Z. Wadjo; Hotlarisda Girsang; Heri Budianto
Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains Vol. 7 No. 4: APRIL 2024 - Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains (JKS)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/jks.v7i4.5178

Abstract

Menurut sejarah, pengakuan bersalah pada sistem peradilan pidana sudah dikenal sejak zaman kuno. Bahkan, pengakuan bersalah dapat dijadikan dasar yang kuat bagi hakim untuk memutus suatu perkara. Pengakuan terdakwa di dalam proses persidangan bisa berupa pengakuan secara lisan ataupun secara tulisan. Pengakuan terdakwa tidak menghapuskan kewajiban penuntut umum membuktikan kesalahan terdakwa, yang mensyaratkan bahwa pemeriksaan dan pembuktian lebih lanjut perlu untuk dilakukan. Dalam pasal 189 ayat (4) KUHAP yang berbunyi “keterangan terdakwa saja tidak cukup untuk membuktikan bahwa ia bersalah melakukan perbuatan yang didakwakan kepadanya, melainkan harus disertai alat bukti yang lain”. Bahkan Majelis Hakim dalam proses persidangan untuk menjatuhkan putusan minimal ada dua alat bukti sah yang dijadikan sebagai pijakan, sebagaimana dijelaskan pada Pasal 183 Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP) juga menjelaskan bahwa “Hakim tidak boleh menjatuhkan pidana kepada seorang kecuali apabila dengan sekurang-kurangnya dua alat bukti yang sah ia memperoleh keyakinan bahwa suatu tindakan pidana benar-benar terjadi dan bahwa terdakwalah yang bersalah melakukannya”.
Legal Protection Against Patients who Experience Overdose Muslimah; Ta’adi; Diana Pujiningsih; Andi Wahyuddin Nur; Mawardi
International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Vol. 6 No. 4: October 2024 - International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/ijhess.v6i4.6263

Abstract

Overdose is a serious condition that occurs due to consuming excessive amounts of a drug or substance, which can be life-threatening. Legal protection for patients who experience an overdose is very important, especially related to patient rights, responsibilities of medical personnel, and health policies. According to WHO (World Health Organization), overdose is the use of psychoactive substances in dangerous amounts, which results in adverse effects, including death. Legal protection of patients who have overdosed is essential to ensure that they receive necessary treatment without fear of legal consequences. By upholding patient rights, medical personnel responsibilities, and supportive health policies, we can reduce the impact of overdoses and improve health outcomes for at-risk individuals. Collaboration between the government, health service providers, and the community is needed to create a safe environment for patients and their families.