Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

THE TRANSPARENCY OF INFORMATION IN TERMS OF CRIME CLEARANCE IN BANGKALAN POLICE RESORT AREA AS A CONTROL FOR POLICE PERFORMANCE BY SOCIETY Effendi, Tolib
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol 16, No 1 (2016)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2016.16.1.447

Abstract

Transparency of information became one of the legal reform agenda within the theme of strengthtening the rule of law. Without any public transparency of information, particulary in terms of the completion of criminal cases (crime clearance) by the police, then how can the public contribute to monitor the criminal justice system. Therefore, it needs to be re-examined regarding the transparency of information about the completion of the criminal case as one of the control performance of the police by the public. This research is a descriptive – exploratory elaborated on the level of transparency of information about the crime clearance of the case in the Police Bangkalan as one of the control performance of the police by the public. The transparency of information about the number of cases solved by the Police Bangkalan certaintly can support public trust in the performance conducted by the police. This study started from the idea that one model of control that occur in Indonesia within the framework of the criminal justice system is community involvement in monitoring/ control of law enforcement.Keyword: Transparency, Control, Police, Public.
RE-EVALUASI SISTEM PENUNTUTAN DALAM KUHAP Effendi, Tolib
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 19, No 1 (2012)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Presecution system is one of the criminal justice system’s elements. In Indonesia, the presecution system does not clearly state whether it follows legality principle or opportunity principle. A strict regulation regarding to the presecution system influences the criminal justice system. Re-evaluation of the presecution system through the opportunity principle as stated in the Draft of Criminal Code Procedure of 2008 does not only bring impacts towards the Indonesian criminal justice system but also balance the victims position which has got less attention during these years.
RE-EVALUASI SISTEM PENUNTUTAN DALAM KUHAP Tolib Effendi
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 19, No 1 (2012)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.v19i1.1981

Abstract

Presecution system is one of the criminal justice system’s elements. In Indonesia, the presecution system does not clearly state whether it follows legality principle or opportunity principle. A strict regulation regarding to the presecution system influences the criminal justice system. Re-evaluation of the presecution system through the opportunity principle as stated in the Draft of Criminal Code Procedure of 2008 does not only bring impacts towards the Indonesian criminal justice system but also balance the victims position which has got less attention during these years.
Arti Penting Pengaturan Kejahatan Ekosida Sebagai Tindak Pidana di Indonesia Mohammad Jumhari; Tolib Effendi
Jurnal Pamator : Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Trunojoyo Vol 15, No 1: April 2022
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/pamator.v15i1.14133

Abstract

Konsep ekosida sudah selayaknya menjadi salah satu kejahatan yang memiliki peluang untuk dimasukkan ke dalam peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia karena penghancuran ekosistem ini sangat membahayakan dan memberikan bayang-bayang terhadap kehancuran, mengingat fokusnya pada kerusakan yang besar dan berkaitan dengan dampaknya terhadap sebagian dari hak yang menjadi HAM. Beberapa negara di dunia mengatur ekosida sebagai bagian dari kejahatan terhadap kemanusiaan maupun hak asasi manusia. Batasan dalam penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji: 1) apakah ekosida dapat dikategorikan sebagai kejahatan serius berdasarkan elemen internasional dalam konsep tindak pidana internasional; serta 2) apakah perlu pengaturan tentang ekosida sebagai salah satu tindak pidana di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan statute approach dan conceptual approach. Kejahatan ekosida belum dikategorikan sebagai tindak pidana internasional dan belum diatur secara terpisah sebagai kejahatan yang berdiri sendiri walaupun beberapa negara sudah mengaturnya sebagai bagian dari kejahatan terhadap kemanusiaan. Ekosida hanya termasuk ke dalam kejahatan pengrusakan lingkungan dan dalam skala internasional merupakan bagian dari kejahatan perang apabila kerusakan lingkungan terjadi karena dampak dari konflik bersenjata.
Illegal Levies as a Negative Element Contributing to The Decrease of The Tourism Potential on Madura Tolib Effendi; Rusmilawati Windari
International Journal of Business, Economics, and Social Development Vol 3, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Research Collaboration Community (RCC)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46336/ijbesd.v3i1.172

Abstract

As revealed by the World Economic Forum, there is a correlation between corruption and tourism: the higher the level of corruption of a state, as reflected in the Corruption Perceptions Index of Transparency International, the lower the number of foreign tourists visiting the state. As such, a very strong correlation exists between the community development index, tourism, and the community’s legal awareness on the journey to the eradication of illegal fees. Illegal fees have to date been regarded as something normal in society. Illegal fees have become a regular in every sector, which must be ceased, and this holds true to the tourism sector as well. It is thus become essential to study the correlation between illegal fees in the tourism sector and the undermined tourism potential on Madura.Illegal fees have become part of the systems applied in Indonesia, including in the tourism sector. One of the reasons behind visitors’ disinterest in visiting a tourist attraction is the illegal fees someone imposes there, whether they be in the form of entrance fees or in the form of parking fees. The absence of a price standard allows some irresponsible persons to collect such fees as entrance and parking fees at tourist attractions variably according to the situation that arises in a given time.This paper uses a socio-legal research method to investigate directly into the relationship between illegal fees in the tourism sector and the undermined tourism potential on Madura. Primary data, collected through interviews, survey, and observation, were analyzed descriptively.
Child Rights and Human Security: Promoting Child Protection At The Tourist Attractions On Madura Rusmilawati Windari; Tolib Effendi
International Journal of Business, Economics, and Social Development Vol 2, No 4 (2021)
Publisher : Research Collaboration Community (RCC)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46336/ijbesd.v2i4.171

Abstract

Tourism nowadays is a promising as well as challenging industry. The need for having leisure, relaxation, and inner satisfaction is not of the tertiary nature, but the primary one. Each country, of course, is actively improving its own tourist attractions for its economic growth. Madura, as a big island in East Java with many tourist attractions, is in a continuous improvement in the last five years. Unfortunately, child protection has not been considered a significant part of the designing of good tourism. Given that children are the main targets of tourism, good, peaceful tourism will be realized with the fulfillment of child rights at the tourist attractions. This paper is a socio-legal research work that uses primary data from observations and interviews with relevant respondents. All of the data are analyzed in a descriptive-qualitative manner. This paper aims at exploring and analyzing the efforts made by local governments in promoting child protection through human security at the tourist attractions on Madura. Moreover, it also describes the obstacles faced by these local governments along with some solutions to such obstacles. The main finding is Sampang Regency has initiated a role of the service in charge in child protection, which is currently assumed by the Social Service, across all regional strategic development fields, including the tourism sector.
Dualisme Konsep Pungutan Liar sebagai Tindak Pidana Korupsi dan Tindak Pidana Umum Tolib Effendi; Rusmilawati Windari
Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol. 8 No. 2 (2022): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi
Publisher : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v8i2.876

Abstract

The absence of delineation regarding the imposition of illegal levies under Presidential Regulation No. 87 of 2016 on the Illegal Levy Eradication Task Force has driven law enforcers, especially the Illegal Levy Eradication Task Force (Saber Pungli), to be varied in establishing delineation in the enforcement of illegal levy affairs. The imposition of illegal levies is treated by law enforcers as a corruption offence as well as an extortion offence. The issues raised in this research concern how the offence of imposing illegal levies should be formulated in alignment with criminal law concepts and the reality in society, as well as whether the imposition of illegal levies should be categorised as a corruption offence. The aim of this paper is to review the regulation of the imposition of illegal levies as a corruption offence, as well as the implementation of the law. This research uses a normative research method with statute and conceptual approaches. The legal sources were analysed deductively from the general to the specific. The concept used in this review is the basic concept in criminal law regarding general criminal laws and special criminal laws. Based on the results, this research concluded that the government should confirm the delineation of acts categorised as the imposition of illegal levies, regardless of whether it is part of the corruption offence category or not.
KONSEKUENSI PENETAPAN STATUS KELOMPOK KRIMINAL BERSENJATA (KKB) DALAM KONFLIK PAPUA SEBAGAI GERAKAN TERORIS MENURUT HUKUM PIDANA Tolib Effendi; Ananda Chrisna Dewi Panjaitan
RechtIdee Vol 16, No 2 (2021): December
Publisher : Trunojoyo Madura University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/ri.v16i2.11823

Abstract

Berdasarkan sejarahnya, sebelum diberikan label sebagai teroris oleh pemerintah, aksi kekerasan yang dilakukan oleh sekelompok orang di Papua mendapatkan sebutan yang berbeda, pihak Kepolisian menyebut Kelompok Kriminal Bersenjata (KKB) sedangkan Tentara Nasional Indonesia menggunakan istilah Kelompok Separatis Bersenjata (KSB), namun bagi Organisasi Papua Merdeka (OPM), kelompok tersebut adalah pejuang yang ingin memisahkan diri dari Indonesia. Berbagai penyerangan yang dilakukan oleh KKB/ KSB/ OPM terhadap aparat penegak hukum yang bertugas di Papua, memaksa pemerintah untuk secara tegas menetapkan aksi tindakan maupun kelompok yang melakukan kekerasan di Papua sebagai tindak pidana teroris. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah penetapan status tersebut tepat dan bagaimana konsekuensi penetapan status teroris tersebut dalam sudut pandang hukum pidana baik materiil maupun formil. Metode yang dipergunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwasanya penetapan KKB/ KSB/ OPM dalam konflik bersenjata di Papua sebagai kelompok teroris tidak tepat karena latar belakang sejarah serta pemenuhan unsur-unsur yang termuat dalam UU Pemberantasan Terorisme tidak tepat. Penetapan status teroris tersebut bukanlah solusi untuk mengatasi konflik di Papua karena memiliki konsekuensi tidak hanya terhadap kualifikasi tindak pidana yang dilakukan tetapi dengan instrument hukum, model penegakan hukum dan pihak yang terlibat dalam penanganan KKB/ KSB/ OPM.
Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice as an Expansion of the Meaning of Case Waiver Effendi, Tolib; Rato, Dominikus; Anggono, Bayu Dwi
RechtIdee Vol 19, No 2 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Trunojoyo Madura University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/ri.v19i2.27609

Abstract

The Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) and the Attorney General's Act give the public prosecutor and the Attorney General the authority to terminate prosecution, close cases in the interests of the law and set aside cases in the interests of the public. After Prosecutor's Regulation Number 15 of 2020 brings new problems because there is a termination of prosecution based on restorative justice which was previously unknown in both the Criminal Procedure Code and the Attorney General's Act. The purpose of this paper is to determine the position of termination of prosecution based on restorative justice as an extension of the meaning of termination of prosecution,  closing cases in the interests of the law or setting aside cases in the interests of the public, and to determine the legal consequences of termination of cases based on restorative justice. The research method used is doctrinal research to find consistency and legal certainty in the termination of prosecution based on restorative justice.
The concept of non-conviction-based asset forfeiture as a special coercive measure in eradicating criminal acts of corruption Effendi, Tolib; Maulana, Mifta Hurrahman; Panjaitan, Ananda Chrisna Dewy
Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi
Publisher : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v11i1.1386

Abstract

The efforts to eradicate corruption in Indonesia have yet to demonstrate substantial outcomes at the implementation level. Indeed, the law's provisions for the eradication of corruption are commendable, with the imposition of capital punishment for those found guilty of corruption being a notable aspect. However, this legislative initiative appears to be merely a rhetorical exercise in legal romanticism for the community, without the requisite accompanying enforcement mechanisms to ensure its implementation. The aim of this study is to provide a reconstruction of the understanding of law enforcement in the context of corruption interpretation. Additionally, this study seeks to ascertain the congruence between the legal principles and the actual practices of law enforcement. The present study employs a normative legal methodology, utilizing secondary data that is subjected to qualitative analysis. The findings of this study indicate the presence of a dichotomy between the legal framework and the practices of law enforcement, suggesting that the efforts undertaken to combat corruption may not have been as effective as desired. Judges have demonstrated a tendency to interpret corruption in a narrow manner, frequently imposing lenient sentences on corrupt individuals. Consequently, the prevalence of corruption is not declining; instead, it is escalating in all domains of social and state life. This issue demands meticulous consideration, as the ramifications of corruption are pervasive and deleterious to all parties. To address this pressing issue, law enforcement officials must demonstrate the fortitude to implement the provisions of the law effectively. Anticipated outcomes include the establishment of an anti-corruption legal culture in Indonesia, with the initial phase being the alignment between the legal substance and the actions of law enforcement officials.