R. Benny Riyanto
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

NILAI-NILAI PANCASILA PONDASI PENEGAKAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA Rofi Wahanisa; R. Benny Riyanto; Septhian Eka Adiyatma; Ahmad Habib Al Fikry
Hukum dan Politik dalam Berbagai Perspektif No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Hukum dan Politik dalam Berbagai Perspektif

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/hp.v1i2.155

Abstract

UUD NRI 1945 sebagai konstitusi negara dalam pasal 1 ayat (3) menyatakan bahwa, “Indonesia adalah negara hukum”, eksistensi sebagai negara hukum tentu saja membawa konsekuensi bagi negara dalam merumuskan setiap peraturan/instrumen hukum harus berpedoman Pancasila sebagai volkgeits, yaitu sebagai suatu sistem nilai kehidupan berbangsa dan bernegara yang digali sesuai cita-cita, kebudayaan dan perjalanan hidup bangsa Indonesia. Pancasila sebagai ideologi menjadi leitstar atau bintang pemandu dalam setiap segi kehidupan manusia Indonesia, bermasyarakat, berbangsa dan bernegara. Nilainilai dalam setiap silanya adalah hasil perenungan dan digali dari kepribadian bangsa Indonesia. Merawat dan mengamalkan Pancasila adalah kewajiban setiap manusia Indonesia. Termasuk dalam penegakan hukum, penegakan hukum di negara ini harus lah mencerminkan nilai-nilai Pancasila. Karena dalam hukum Pancasila adalah sebagai sumber dari segala sumber hukum sekaligus sebagai batu uji peraturan perundang-undangan yang dihasilkan dari proses legislasi.
From Justice to Politics: The Constitutional Court’s Role in Structured and Systematic Election Violations Rofi Wahanisa; R. Benny Riyanto; Syahwal; Eko Mukminto; Uche Nnawulezi
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): May, 2025: Law, Technology, and Globalization: Challenges and Innovations in th
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v9i1.21103

Abstract

This research analyzes the judicial implications of the Constitutional Court’s rulings on structured, systematic, and massive (TSM) violations in Indonesian elections, and their impact on democratic integrity. Using a socio-legal approach, it combines legal analysis with social science perspectives to examine how the Court interprets and applies TSM principles within a broader socio-political context. The study finds that while the Constitutional Court plays a pivotal role in upholding electoral integrity and safeguarding democratic values, significant challenges remain. Chief among these is the difficulty of proving TSM violations, which are often entangled with powerful political interests. These challenges can weaken public trust, hinder accountability, and contribute to a democratic deficit. The study concludes that more robust judicial mechanisms and clearer evidentiary standards are needed to ensure fair adjudication and strengthen Indonesia’s democratic institutions.
The Legal Framework of the State Intelligence Agency (BIN) as Coordinator of Intelligence Activities in Indonesia Wicaksana, Gede Agung Patra; R. Benny Riyanto; Muttaqin, Zainal; Hiariej, Edward Omar Sharif; Suparman, Eman
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): November, 2025: Law, Policy, and Governance in Contemporary Socio-Economic Tran
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v9i2.20460

Abstract

This study analyzes the legal and operational challenges hindering Indonesia's State Intelligence Agency (BIN) from effectively coordinating national intelligence activities. Findings reveal that BIN's establishment via presidential regulation, rather than statutory law, weakens its authority over law-based agencies like TNI and Polri, causing coordination failures. The absence of constitutional recognition, a permanent coordinating body, and enforcement mechanisms further exacerbates these issues. Urgently, the research proposes: (1) elevating BIN's legal status through constitutional amendment, (2) creating a binding coordination body, and (3) implementing oversight safeguards. These reforms aim to strengthen Indonesia's intelligence system against dynamic threats while balancing centralized authority with democratic accountability. The study contributes a practical framework aligned with international best practices (Thailand and Netherlands) to address critical national security gaps.