Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DAN TWO STAY TWOSTRAY (TSTS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA Rahman, Arif; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (489.222 KB)

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on learning achievement viewed from learning style types of the students. The learning models compared were NHT, TSTS, and classical with scientific approach model. The type of the research was quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial design. The population of this research was the students in grade X senior high school in Mataram City on academic year of 2014/2015. The size of the sample was 279 students, which was taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The instruments used for data collection were learning style questionnaire and mathematics achievement test. The hypothesis test used unbalance two ways analysis of variance. The results of the research were as follows. (1) NHT and TSTS with scientific approach learning models gave better achievement than classical with scientific learning model. NHT and TSTS with scientific approach learning models gave the same achievement. (2) The students with visual and auditory learning style had better achievement than the students with kinesthetic learning style. The students with visual and auditory learning style had the same achievement. (3) In NHT with scientific approach learning model, the students with visual and auditory learning style the same achievement, the students with auditory and visual learning style had better achievement than the students with kinesthetic learning style. In TSTS and Classical with scientific approach learning models, the students with visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning style the same achievement. (4) At the students with visual learning style, NHT and TSTS with scientific approach learning models gave the same achievement. NHT with scientific approach learning model gave better achievement than classical with scientific learning model. TSTS and classical with scientific approach learning models gave the same achievement. At the students with auditory and kinesthetic learning style, NHT, TSTS, and classical with scientific approach learning models gave the same achievement.Keywords: Numbered Heads Together, Two Stay Two Stray, Classical learning model, Scientific Approach, Learning Style, Achievement.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT (TGT) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) PADA MATERI ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN LOGIS MATEMATIS SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI SE-KOTA SURAKARTA TAHUN PELAJARAN 2015/2016 Ayuningrum, Retna; Budiyono, Budiyono; Slamet, Isnandar
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (462.55 KB)

Abstract: The objectives of this research were to find out: (1) which one learning model that provide better mathematics learning achievement, TGT learning model, TPS learning model, or direct learning model, (2) which one category logical matematical intelligence of students that giving better mathematics learning achievement, high, medium, or low, (3) in each category logical matematical intelligence which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, TGT learning model TPS learning model, or direct learningÂ model. (4) in each learning models which one providing better mathematics learning achievement category self confidence high, medium, or low. The type of this study was a quasi-experimental study with a 3x3 factorial design. The population was all grade VII students of Junior High Schools in Surakarta Regency in the school year of 2015/2016. Population of this research was all VII graders of Junior High School of Surakarta. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling. The sample consisted of 291 students: 96 students for experiment I class, 97 for experiment II class and 98 for control class. The instruments used for the data collection were mathematics achievement test and logical mathematical intelligence The data analysis technique used was unbalanced two ways analysis of variance. Based on the hypotheses, the results of the study can be summarized as follows: (1) The use of TGT resulted better achievement than that of TPS and direct learning model, the use of TPS resulted better achievement than that of direct learning model. (2) The studentsâ achievement who have high logical mathematical intelligence was better than those who have middle or low logical mathematical intelligence, and students who have middle logical mathematical intelligence were better than those who have low logical mathematic intelligence.Keywords: TGT,TPS, Direct Learning, and Logical Mathematical Intelligence.

PENGEMBANGAN PAKET NEKAMEDIA MATEMATIKA KURIKULUM 2013 MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR KELAS VIII SMP DI KOTA SURAKARTA Anggraini, Putri Nurika; Budiyono, Budiyono; Slamet, Isnandar
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 9 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (225.325 KB)

Abstract: This study was aimed to obtain 2013 Curriculum of mathematics mutlimedia kit using Problem Based Learning (PBL) model in plane geometry lesson of eighth grade junior high school in Surakarta which is considered as a valid, practical, and effective to be applied for learning. Furthermore, the goal was to discover whether the studentâs achievement of plane geometry lesson using the developed mutlimedia kit is better than using the prior product. The study type was Research and Development (R & D) to generate and verify product effectiveness. Study procedure refers to modified Four-D model (Define, Design, Develope, Disseminate) which is appropriate to study requirements and limitations. In the effort to obtain a valid, practical, and effective mutlimedia kit to be applied for learning, we used questionnaire to obtain these following data: (1) comments and recommendations from experts about mutlimedia kit; (2) learning feasibility score by teachers and follow-up recommendations; (3) activity score of students and follow-up recommendations; and (4) appreciation and eagerness level of students toward mutlimedia kit. We used test as an attempt to figure out whether the studentâs achievement of plane geometry lessons using the developed mutlimedia kit is better than using the prior product. Study results conclude that mutlimedia kit is valid, practical, and effective to be used in learning activity. Percentage of learning feasibility by teachers is 92%, percentage of studentsâ activities is 80%, and percentage of students who appreciate and want to use mutlimedia kit is 80%. After being tested, final studentâs achievement of experimental class is better than final studentâs achievement of control class.Key words: mathematics mutlimedia kit, 2013 Curriculum, Problem Based Learning (PBL) model, plane geometry.

KOOPERATIF TIPE TAI (TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION) DAN NHT (NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN MAJEMUK SISWA PADA POKOK BAHASAN FUNGSI KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN NGAWI TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2015 Astuti, Indra Puji; Budiyono, Budiyono; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 8 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (285.588 KB)

Abstract: The aim of this research was to determine the effect of learning model, multiple intelligences (logical-mathematical, linguistic, and interpersonal), and their interaction toward mathematics learning achievement. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning of Teams Assisted Individualization with scientific approach (TAI-PS), Numbered Heads Together with scientific approach (NHT-PS), and classical learning with scientific approach (classical-PS). This research was a quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial design. The population of this research was all students in Grade VIII of Junior High School of Ngawi Regency in academic year 2014/2015. This research used stratified cluster random sampling technique. The data analysis techniques of this research used two-way analysis of variance with unequal cells. With the 5% level of significance the result were as follows. (1) TAI-PS gave better mathematics learning achievement than NHT-PS and classical-PS. In addition, NHT-PS gave the same mathematics learning achievement as classical-PS. (2) Students with logical-mathematical and interpersonal intelligence had better mathematics learning achievement than students with linguistic intelligence. Students with logical-mathematical intelligence had the same mathematics learning achievement as students with interpersonal intelligence. (3) At the TAI-PS, students with logical-mathematical, linguistic, and interpersonal intelligence got same mathematics learning achievement. At the NHT-PS, students with logical-mathematical, linguistic, and interpersonal intelligence got same mathematics learning achievement. At the classical-PS, students with logical-mathematical and interpersonal intelligence had better mathematics learning achievement than linguistic intelligence. In addition, students with logical-mathematical intelligence had the same mathematics learning achievement as students with interpersonal intelligence. (4) At the logical-mathematical intelligence, TAI-PS, NHT-PS, and classical-PS gave the same mathematics learning achievement. At the linguistic intelligence, TAI-PS gave the same mathematics learning achievement as NHT-PS. In addition, NHT-PS and TAI-PS gave better mathematics learning achievement than classical-PS. At the interpersonal intelligence, TAI-PS, NHT-PS, and classical-PS gave the same mathematics learning achievement.Keywords: Multiple Intelligences, Classical, NHT (Numbered Heads Together), Scientific Approach, TAI (Team Assisted Individualization)

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI), THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS), DAN PEMBELAJARAN LANGSUNG PADA MATERI ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN MAJEMUK SISWA SMP NEGERI SE-KOTA SURAKARTA TAHUN PELAJARAN 2015/2016 Hermawati, Evi; Budiyono, Budiyono; Slamet, Isnandar
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 7 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (498.096 KB)

Abstract: This research aimed to find out: 1) which one providing better mathematics learning achievement: Group Investigation (GI) Â model, Think Pair Share (TPS) model, or direct instructional model, 2) which one providing better mathematics learning achievement: linguistic intelligence students, mathematics-logic intelligence students, or interpersonal intelligence students, 3) in each type of multiple intelligences which one providing better mathematics learning achievement: GI model, TPS model, or direct instructional model, and 4) in each learning models which one providing better mathematics learning achievement: linguistic intelligence students, mathematics-logic intelligence students, or interpersonal intelligence students. This research used the quasi experimental research method. The design of the research was a 3 Ã 3 factorial. The population was the students of the seventh grade of Junior High School in Surakarta City on academic year 2015/2016. The technique of sampling was stratified cluster random sampling. The proposed hypothesis of the research were tested by the unbalanced two-way analysis of variance. The conclusions of this research were as follows. 1) GI model provided better mathematics learning achievement than TPS model, or direct instructional model; TPS model provided mathematics learning achievement as good as direct instructional model. 2) The mathematics-logic intelligence students had better mathematics learning achievement than linguistic intelligence students, or interpersonal intelligence students; the mathematics learning achievement of linguistic intelligence students as good as interpersonal intelligence students. 3) In each type of multiple intelligences, GI model provided better mathematics learning achievement than TPS model, or direct instructional model; TPS model provided mathematics learning achievement as good as direct instructional learning. 4) In each learning models, the mathematics-logic intelligence students had better mathematics learning achievement than linguistic intelligence students, or interpersonal intelligence students; the mathematics learning achievement of linguistic intelligence students as goog as interpersonal intelligence students.Keywords: Group Investigation, Think Pair Share, direct instructional learning, multiple intelligence, mathematics learning achievementÂ

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DAN TWO STAY-TWO STRAY (TS-TS) PADA POKOK BAHASAN PERSAMAAN DAN PERTIDAKSAMAAN KUADRAT DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR PADA SISWA SMA NEGERI KELAS X DI KABUPATEN PONOROGO Fuany, Anggun; Budiyono, Budiyono; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 8 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (293.047 KB)

Abstract. The objectives of this research were to determine: (1) which students had the better mathematics learning achievement, instructed with TPS, TS-TS, or direct learning; (2) which students had the better mathematics learning achievement, those with the converger, diverger, assimilator, or accommodator learning style; (3) in each learning style, whichÂ students had better mathematics learning achievement, instructed with TPS, TS-TS, or direct learning; (4) in each learning model, which students had a better mathematics learning achievement, those with the converger, diverger, assimilator, or accommodator learning style. This study wasÂ aquasi-experimental study with 3 x 4 factorial designs. The study population was a tenth grade student of State SMA in Ponorogo in academic year of 2015/2016. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The study sample consisted of students in 3 schools namely SMA Negeri 1 Badegan, SMA Negeri 1 Kauman, and SMA Negeri 1 Bungkal with a sample size of 226 students. Data analysis used unbalanced two-way ANAVA with a significance level of 5%. The results of the research are as follows. (1) The students instructed with TPS had learning achievement as good as TS-TS, those with TPS had learning achievement better than those with direct learning, while those TS-TS had learning achievement as good as those with direct learning. (2)The students with the converger learning style had learning achievement better than those with the diverger and assimilator learning style, the students with the converger learning style had learning achievement as good as those with the accommodator learning style, the students with the diverger, assimilator, and accommodator learning style had a same learning achievement. (3) In each learning style, the students mathematics learning achievement was in consistency with the result (1); (4) In each learning model, the students mathematics learning achievement was in consistency with the result (2).Keywords: TPS, TS-TS, Direct Learning, learning styles, and learningÂ achievement

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR AND SHARE (TPS) DAN TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI LENGKUNG DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN SPASIAL Zuhanisani, Virlina; Budiyono, Budiyono; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (503.841 KB)

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from the spatial intelligence of the students. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning model of the Think Pair And Share (TPS) type with scientific approach, Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) model type with scientific approach, and classical model with scientific approach. The type of this study was a quasi-experimental study with a 3x3 factorial design. The population was all grade IX students of Junior High Schools in Grobogan Regency. Instruments used for data collection were mathematics achievement test and spatial intelligence test. Data analysis tecnique was used to test the hypothesis wasÂ two-ways analysis of variance with unbalanced cell as a 3x3 factorial design. Based on the hypothesis, the results of the study can be explained as follows. (1) Scientific TPS got better achievement than scientific TAI and with scientific classical, scientific TAI got better achievement than scientific classical. (2) Students with high spatial intelligence got the same achievement as middle spatial intelligence. In addition, students who had high and middle spatial intelligence got better achievement than those who had low spatial intelligence. (3) In the spatial intelligence of high category, the achievement of the students who were treated with scientific TPS was better than those who were treated with scientific TAI and treated with scientific classical, students treated who were with scientific TAI got same achievement with those treated who were with scientific classical. In the spatial intelligence category of middle and low, with scientific TPS, with scientific TAI and with scientific classical gave the same achievement. (4) In the with scientific TPS, the students who had high spatial intelligence got the same achievement with middle spatial intelligence. In addition, the students who had high and middle spatial intelligence got better achievement than those who had low spatial intelligence. In the with scientific TAI and with scientific classical, the students who had high, middle, and low spatial intelligence got same achievement.Keywords: Think Pair And Share, Team Assisted Individualization, Classical, Scientific Approach, Spatial Intelligence.

MENDAPAT PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH DENGAN SISWA YANG MENDAPAT PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA SMP NEGERI SE-KOTA METRO, LAMPUNG TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2015 Pratama, Yulian Surya; Budiyono, Budiyono; Slamet, Isnandar
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 8 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (305.734 KB)

Abstract: The purpose of this research was to know the effect of the learning models on the problem solving ability and mathematics communication ability viewed from the learning style. The learning models compared were Problem Based Learning, Think Pair Share learning and Classical. The type of this study was a quasi-experimental study with a 3 x 3 factorial design. The study population was all grade VIII students of Junior High School in Metro city. Sample was collected by stratified cluster random sampling and consisted of 245 students which where divided into three groups,Â 83 students in Experimental Group 1, 81 students in Experimental Group 2, and 81 students in Control Group . The instruments of the research include problem solving ability test, mathematics communication ability test and learning style test. The technique of analyzing data used the two-way multivariate analysis of variance with unbalanced cell. The results of this research could be concluded as follows. (1) Problem Based Learning and Think Pair Share have better problem solving and mathematics communication ability aspects than the Classical learning, Besides that, Think Pair Share and Classical LearningÂ have the same problem solving and mathematics communication ability; (2) The students who have visual learning style have better problem solving and mathematics communication ability than students who have kinesthetic learning style. In addition, students with auditory learning style have the same problem solving and mathematics communication ability as kinesthetic learning style (3) In each of the learning style, the learning model of Problem Based Learning give a better problem solving and mathematics communication ability than the Classical model, and the cooperative learning model of Think Pair Share and Classical Learning give the same problem solving and mathematics communication ability; (4) In each learning model, the students with visual and auditory learning style have better problem solving and mathematics communication ability than students who have kinesthetic learning style, and the students with visual and auditory learning style have the same problem solving and mathematics communication ability.Keywords: Problem Based Learning, Think Pair Share, Learning Style, Problem Solving Ability, Mathematics Communication Ability.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING, TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION DAN STUDENT TEAMS ACHIVEMENT DIVISIONS DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK TERHADAP PEMAHAMAN KONSEP DAN KETRAMPILAN KOMPUTASI MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT Ardiyanto, David; Budiyono, Budiyono; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (374.333 KB)

Abstract: The aim of this research was to know the effect of the Problem Based Learning (PBL), Teams Assisted Individualization (TAI), and Students Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) with the scientific approachÂ viewed from students Adversity Quotient (AQ). The results of the research were as follows. (1) Students who were subjected to the PBL have a better understanding of concepts than students with the TAI while students were subjected to TAI have the same understanding of concepts as students who with STAD (2) Students who were subjected to the PBL have the same computing skills as students with the TAI, and TAI have the same computing skills as students with STAD, but students who were subjected to the PBL have better computing skills than students with STAD. (3) Students with high AQ have better conceptual understanding than students with medium and low AQ, and the students with medium AQ were better than low AQ. (4) Students with high AQ has better computing skills than students with medium and low AQ, and students with medium AQ have the same computing skills as low AQ. (5) In each of the learning model, students with high AQ have a better understanding of concepts than students with medium and low AQ, and students with medium AQ have a better understanding of concepts than low AQ. (6) In each of the learning model, students who have high AQ have better computing skills than students who have medium and low AQ, and students with medium AQ have the same computing skills equally as students who have low AQ. (7) In each AQ, students were subjected to the PBL have better understanding of concepts than students who were subjected to the TAI while students who were subjected to TAI have the same understanding of concept as with students who were subjected to the STAD. (8) In each AQ, students with the PBL have the same computing skills as students with TAI, students with TAI have the same computation skills as students ofÂ STAD, but students who were subjected to the PBL has the computing skills has better than students with STAD.Keywords : Learning model of PBL, TAI, STAD, scientific approach, Adversity Quotient (AQ), conceptual understanding, computation skill.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE DENGAN LEARNING STARTS WITH A QUESTION DAN THINK PAIR SHARE PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN BEKERJA SAMA SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN KARANGANYAR Susanti, Ika; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 9 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (296.541 KB)

Abstract: The objectives of this research were to investigate: (1) which of the TPS-LSWQ learning model, the TPS learning model, and the direct learning model results in a better mathematics learning achievement; (2) which of the students with high, medium, and low team work have a better mathematics learning achievement; and (3) which of team work of the students result in a better learning achievement for each learning models; and (4) which of the TPS-LSWQ, TPS and direct learning models result in a better learning achievement for each level of team work of the students. This research used the quasi-experimental method. The population of this research was all students of the junior secondary schools in Karanganyar in the academic year of 2014/2015. The samples of this research consisted of 272 students who were divided into three experiment groups. The three groups consisted of group 1, group 2, and group 3. In each group 1,2, and 3 consisted of 90, 92, and 90 students. The data of this research were gathered from test of learning achievement in mathematics and questionnaire. The data were then analyzed by using unbalanced two-way analysis of variance. According to the research results, it can be concluded: (1) the learning model of TPS-LSWQ was better than that of the TPS and direct learning models while the learning model of TPS was better than the direct learning model; (2) the students with high team work had a better learning achievement than those with medium and low team work while the students with medium team work was better than the low team work; (3) in each team work, student with high team work, medium team work, and low team work, the mathematics learning achievement of the students taught with TPS-LSWQ learning model, TPS learning model, and direct learning model was as good as that of those; and (4) in TPS-LSWQ learning model, students with high, medium and low team work had the same achievement, the TPS learning model, students with high, medium, and low team work had the same achievement, the direct learning model, students with high and medium team work hadÂ the same achievement, students with high team work had better achievement than low team work, and students with high team work had better achievement than low team work.Key words: TPS-LSWQ learning model, TPS learning model, direct learning model, team work and learning achievement.

Title

Found 29 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 29 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 29 Documents
Search