Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

MATERIAL TRANSFER AGREEMENT SEBAGAI SARANA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PARA PIHAK DALAM PERJANJIAN PENGALIHAN MATERI BIOLOGI Sogar Simamora; Agung Sudjatmiko; Ria Setyawati
Yuridika Vol. 31 No. 2 (2016): Volume 31 No 2 May 2016
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (294.516 KB) | DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v31i2.4855

Abstract

Biological material is largely a free component, but the development of these materials can be objects that have commercial high value. Thus, the biological material is also associated with the ownership and control should be regulated by the misuse of biological materials hukum. According to the characteristics of MTA as a civil agreement, the parties will be decisive in the formulation of the agreement, but the characteristics of biological materials, including viruses, which can endanger the safety and threaten public health requires the use of surveillance capabilities sampled by the competent authority. Thus, the protection of the right to material biologidan implementation monitoring system redirects biological materials need to be studied in detail for the purpose of sharing microbiological material for the benefit of mankind could reached . Indonesia's cases refusal to carry through the mechanism of virus sharing GISN (Global Influenza Surveillance Network) in the system of the World Health Organization (wHO) in 2007, the result of a lack of regulations concerning the transfer of biological material not truly perfect
The Tensions On The Protection Of Local-Traditional Indonesian Batik Ria Setyawati; Mas Rahmah; Rahmi Jened; Nurul Barizah; Agung Sujatmiko
Yuridika Vol. 36 No. 1 (2021): Volume 36 No 1 January 2021
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (389.895 KB) | DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v36i1.24077

Abstract

Batik artwork has been known for hundreds of years and has become part of the culture of Indonesian society. Some batik motifs in Indonesia have philosophical values and are part of traditional traditional ceremony activities. Along with the times, the creativity of batik artists has become varied even though ancient traditional motifs are still mass produced and used as inspiration. This research examines the legal protection for traditional batik in order to avoid the abuse of rights by certain parties who merely exploit it in order to benefit from the existence of traditional batik works. The formulation of the problem that will be examined in this research is whether traditional batik gets legal protection under the copyright regime in Indonesia? Are there any legal safeguards at the international level for traditional Indonesian batik works? In answering this problem formulation will use a conceptual approach and a statutory approach. This research is a legal research that will examine existing legal concepts and related legal rules in solving legal problems related to the protection of traditional batik.
Perlindungan Karya Batik Tradisional Kampung Pesilat Melalui Merek Kolektif Ria Setyawati; Mas Rahmah; Normandyarsa Rahman
Pelita Masyarakat Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023): Pelita Masyarakat, Maret
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/pelitamasyarakat.v4i2.8638

Abstract

Traditional batik products made by artisans in a community or region are often not aware of the importance of protecting their work through Intellectual Property Rights, especially brands. Even though the potential for the development of traditional batik products can be optimized through brand protection. An example is the traditional batik work produced by the people of Kampung Pesilat in Madiun Regency. Kampung Pesilat's batik creations already exist and have been passed down from generation to generation until now, the batik craftsmen still carry out small-scale production. This research will examine the proper brand protection for the development of traditional Batik handicraft products. This research is legal research, namely normative legal research. The approach used is the statute approach and conceptual approach.
URGENSI PENGATURAN LENIENCY PROGRAM TERHADAP DUGAAN KARTEL ATAS KELANGKAAN MINYAK GORENG DI INDONESIA Arya Putra Rizal Pratama; Ria Setyawati; L. Budi Kagramanto; Sinar Aju Wulandari
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.479

Abstract

Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition stipulates various prohibitions for actions that cause unfair business competition, especially contractual activities between business actors, one of which is a cartel The actions of this cartel have an impact on the sustainability and welfare of consumers as a result of price and production regulation in the market. In proving the realm of unfair business competition, namely cartel, it can be proven through indirect evidence. Indirect evidence according to the Regulation of the Commission for the Supervision of Business Competition Number 1 of 2010 concerning Procedures for Handling Cases is a guide. The cartel case approach which is regulated through Article 11 of Law Number 5 of 1999 adopts the principlerule of reason tend to see and examine the reasons of business actors who commit an act that is considered to violate the competition law. However, the success of disclosing cartel cases is still experiencing obstacles. Several countries have implemented leniency program as a response to cartel cases. The process of enforcing business competition law in Indonesia has not been able to overcome cartel cases that have harmed consumers. The results of this study explain the difficulty in disclosing cartel cases in Indonesia because there are no parties or informants to assist law enforcement to ascertain the alleged cartel. The urgency of the leniency program is the only way to reduce difficulties and restore an efficient and effective economic situation so that consumers are able to prosper.
Persekongkolan Pelaku Usaha Produsen Mesin Industri Terhadap Kebocoran Rahasia Perusahaan Dalam Perspektif Hukum Persaingan Usaha Sinar Aju Wulandari; Ihsan Wibisana Adindi; Ria Setyawati
UNES Law Review Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/y2jd0n15

Abstract

Kasus dugaan persekongkolan antara PT Chiyoda Kogyo Indonesia dan PT Unique Solutions Indonesia menyoroti isu penting dalam hukum persaingan usaha, khususnya terkait kebocoran rahasia perusahaan yang berpotensi melanggar Pasal 23 Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Fokus utama kajian ini adalah untuk menelaah apakah tindakan tersebut termasuk bentuk pelanggaran hukum persaingan usaha dan bagaimana kewenangan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) dalam menangani serta menjatuhkan sanksi terhadap persekongkolan yang menyebabkan kebocoran rahasia perusahaan. Penelitian dilakukan dengan metode yuridis normatif, menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual, serta dianalisis melalui penafsiran gramatikal, dan sistematis. Sumber data terdiri dari bahan hukum primer seperti undang-undang dan putusan, serta bahan hukum sekunder berupa doktrin dan literatur ilmiah. Teori hukum persaingan usaha dan perlindungan rahasia dagang digunakan sebagai landasan dalam memahami keterkaitan antara persekongkolan dan perlindungan informasi bisnis. Kajian ini diharapkan mampu memberikan pemahaman hukum yang komprehensif terkait bentuk-bentuk persekongkolan yang dilarang serta mekanisme penanganannya.
Legal Protection of Artificial Intelligence As A Copyrights Widya Agung Kristanti; Agung Sujatmiko; Ria Setyawati; Brahmantyo Agung Wicaksono
Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Journal Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies
Publisher : Green Publisher Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59188/eduvest.v5i1.50375

Abstract

In the creative economy, technology significantly enhances human productivity and creativity, prominently through Artificial Intelligence (AI), which simulates human intelligence in computing. The rapid advancement of AI raises numerous debates, particularly in the art sector, where societal opinions vary from opposing the registration of AI-generated artwork to advocating for AI's recognition as a non-person legal entity entitled to moral rights. This discourse centers around granting legal status to AI regarding its artwork and relates to the broader concept of Intellectual Property as it pertains to creators and copyright holders. Currently, Indonesia's Copyright Law Number 8 of 2014 lacks specific provisions addressing these issues, resulting in a legal vacuum. This research aims to analyze the application of copyright legal theory to AI-generated art and the legal implications for its future development and protection. Employing normative legal research, the study utilizes both conceptual and legislative approaches, applying inductive logic to draw conclusions. Findings indicate that AI should be regarded as a legal object, with the rights to its artwork attributed to legal entities possessing natural legal authority. Additionally, the use of AI in creative works aligns with the "work made for hire" doctrine. Ultimately, the study underscores the necessity for responsive and progressive legal frameworks that adapt to the evolving landscape of copyright and AI.
The Interface Between Competition Law and Data Protection : The Need for A More Integrated Approach Nasarudin Abdul Rahman; Ria Setyawati
Media Iuris Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/mi.v9i1.77162

Abstract

This article examines the growing interface between competition law and data protection in the digital economy, where large platforms accumulate vast datasets that raise both antitrust and privacy concerns. Using a qualitative doctrinal and comparative legal approach, this study analyzes legal developments in the EU, Germany, Malaysia and Indonesia to highlight tensions and complementarities between the two regulatory regimes. The paper finds that data-driven market dominance requires regulators to assess practices such as self-preferencing, refusal to supply, and exploitative data processing through both privacy and competition lenses. Case analyses from Facebook and Google illustrate how dominance in digital ecosystems can harm users and stifle competition. In the Malaysian context, the article critiques the limitations of the current legal framework, including the Competition Act 2010 and PDPA 2010, and calls for integrated regulatory reforms. In the Indonesian context, the analysis focuses on the application of Law No. 5 of 1999 on the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition, which, despite not explicitly regulating data, provides an effects-based framework to address data-driven market power, self-preferencing, refusal to supply, and exploitative conduct in digital markets. The findings advocate for a balanced, coordinated framework that addresses the complexities of data governance while fostering innovation, fairness, and user autonomy.