Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

DINAMIKA PENENTUAN ARAH KIBLAT MENGGUNAKAN ALAT KLASIK DAN MODEREN DI MASJID SULTAN ALAUDDIN MADANI Saitul Mahtir; Muhammad Saleh Ridwan
HISABUNA: Jurnal Ilmu Falak Vol 1 No 1 (2020): Maret 2020
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/hisabuna.v1i1.13072

Abstract

Qibla direction is the direction in which all Muslims in all corners of the world look up and turn their faces to His Rab as the servant should be as a condition for the validity of prayer. The Qibla is in Mecca Al-Mukarramah which is in the form of a cube (Ka'bah). The direction of the Kaaba can be determined from any point or place on the surface of the earth with calculations and measurements. Therefore, calculating the Qibla direction is basically a calculation to find out in what direction the Kaaba in Mecca is seen from the surface of the earth. From this study discuss and test the accuracy of the Qibla direction at the Sultan Alauddin Madani Mosque using the classic and modern tools, the istiwa stick 'using the ball triangle method then juxtaposed with the shadow of the sun or the shadow of the Qibla direction. Then with a digital compass using the method of calculating the difference between Mecca and region (SBMD). Where istiwa 'is known as a tool that is not too urjen in society (traditional), while a digital compass maybe everyone already has it in an increasingly modern and sophisticated era like those in Android smartphones and other digital devices.
From Theocentric to Anthropocentric: Reconfiguring Tawḥīd in Contemporary Islamic Thought Saitul Mahtir; Fathorrahman; Aldi Hidayat; Ibnu Azka; Fathur Baldan Haramain
Indonesian Journal of Islamic Literature and Muslim Society Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22515/islimus.v10i1.12570

Abstract

This article examines the paradigm shift in tawḥīd from a theocentric–eschatological orientation to an anthropocentric framework by integrating the ideas of Ismāʿīl Rājī al-Fārūqī and Ḥasan Ḥanafī. Employing a qualitative, analytical–epistemological approach, Thomas S. Kuhn’s framework is used to trace the stages of normal science, anomaly, crisis, and paradigm revolution within the discourse of tawḥīd. Conceptual data are drawn from the principal works of both thinkers and analyzed comparatively and integratively. The findings reveal that the theocentric–eschatological paradigm continues to dominate Islamic scholarship and remains insufficiently responsive to contemporary humanitarian challenges. Al-Fārūqī’s tawḥīd-based principles, encompassing the unity of God, creation, truth–knowledge, life, humanity, and the reciprocity of reason and revelation, provide a multi-sectoral Islamic worldview. Meanwhile, Ḥanafī’s reinterpretation of classical kalām themes, particularly the doctrine of divine attributes, offers operational dimensions for transforming consciousness and guiding social praxis. Their integration produces an anthropocentric tawḥīd that supports the renewal of Islamic sciences, ethical–humanitarian agendas, and educational policy. This study contributes to restoring Islam’s vital élan as both a transformation of consciousness and a spectrum of exemplarity, offering a framework for contextual scholarly responses to the paradigmatic crisis facing Muslims in the digital age.