Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Urgensi Pengelolaan Zakat dalam Mengentaskan Kemiskinan Luthfi Raziq
An-Nawazil: Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah Kontemporer Vol. 1 No. 02 (2019): An-Nawazil: Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah Kontemporer
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syariah As-Salafiyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69784/annawazil.v1i02.50

Dunia usaha sektor pertanian, mengalami perkembangan yang sangat signifikan, sehingga tidak tidak hanya terbatas pada pertanian pangan, akan tetapi juga dunia usaha sektor non-pangan. Kecuali itu, dalam era industri dan informasi, kegiatan perekonomian juga mengalami pergeseran pada kegiatan sektor informasi, sehingga menjadikan berbagai profesi yang sangat beragam dan menjadi perantara sumber penghasilan yang sangat menjanjikan. Tulisan ini hendak mengungkap status hukum zakat pertanian yang berorientasi pada zakat pertanian non pangan dan status hukum zakat profesi. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan sejarah, penelitian ini menghasilkan kesimpulan bahwa zakat pertanian non pangan, bagi Imam Syafi’i dan Imam Malik menyatakan tidak wajib zakat, sedangkan sebagian ulama Maliki berpendapat bahwa yang wajib dizakati dari tanaman non pangangan adalah apabila diniati untuk diperdagangkan. Sementara terkait zakat profesi, para ulama sepakat bahwa status hukumnya wajib dikeluarkan bagi orang-orang yang penghasilannya sudah mencapai satu nishab disebabkan penghasilannya tergolong sebagai al-mal al-mustafid. Dengan demikian, implikasi dari status hukum zakat pertanian non pangan maupun zakat profesi, sejatinya agar menjadi sumber dana yang dapat dimanfaatkan bagi kesejahteraan masyarakat terutama untuk mengentaskan masyarakat dari kemiskinan dan menghapus kesenjangan sosil. Karena itu, perlu adanya pengelolaan zakat secara profesional yang bertanggung jawab yang dilakukan masyarakat bersama pemerintah.

DAKWAH GUSDURIAN ATAS HETERODOKSI ISLAM: Formulasi Inklusif Menghadapi Islam "Sempalan" Aldi Hidayat; Luthfi Raziq; Abd. Mun’em
Jurnal Studi Qur'an dan Tafsir Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): Juni
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, Fakultas Ushuluddin, Universitas Annuqayah (UA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59005/jsqt.v1i1.224

Abstract Aswaja is the dominant Islamic sect in the world level, especially in Indonesia. This dominant position necessitates Aswaja's moderate, tolerant and inclusive attitude towards minorities, such as "splinter" Islamic ideas and movements. Unfortunetly, Aswaja's attitude towards these minor entities tends to be exclucive, even persecutive, as proven by the coercive elimination of the Shiite and Ahmadiyah sects. Through the MUI, this coercive elimination is becoming stronger, as evidenced by a series of physical attacks against these two groups and other groups deemed heretical. This attack is contraproductive to moderation as Aswaja's own doctrine as well as the character of national and state life. On that basis, I will elaborate on Gus Dur's thoughts about hereticy and how to respond it by ellaborating on the verses of the Qur'an along with the preaching verses in Q.S. al-Naḥl [16]: 125 uses Syaḥrūr ḥudūd theory. For this reason, this article will answer two problem formulations. First, what is the Qur'an conception about hereticy? Second, how does Gusdurian's preaching formula address other "deviant" groups? Regarding the first question, the article – by basing itself on the intepretation of Sunni scholars – finds that the deviant version of the Qur'an is aimed at non-Sunni groups. However, the Qur'an proposes three models of da'wah, none of which justifies violence either at the level of discourse, let alone physically. On the other hand, we must place deviant groups as dialogue partners, non an object of exclution and persecution. Keywords: Aswaja, Gus Dur, Da'wah, Hereticy, Tolerance

EPISTEMOLOGY OF TAFSIR PESANTREN: Portrait of Qur’anic Interpretation Studies by KH. Muhammad Shalahuddin Syaiful Bahri; Luthfi Raziq; Fadhilah Khunaini
Jurnal Studi Qur'an dan Tafsir Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): Desember
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, Fakultas Ushuluddin, Universitas Annuqayah (UA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59005/jsqt.v1i2.234

Abstract Pesantren does not only teach the Qur’an but also tafsir with the finished classical books of tafsir, like Tafsîr Jalalayn, Ibnu Katsîr, and others. On the contrary, study of tafsîr in PP. Annuqayah of Lubangsa area is not focused on of those books only, it is personally delivered by KH. Muhammad Shalahuddin leaving the finished classical book of tafsir. This article would like to expres how the methodology of KH.Muhammad Shalahuddin Qur’anic interpretations is? And how the contextualization of KH. Muhammad Shalahuddin Qur’anic interpretations is? The theories which are used to frame those questions are the methodology of Islah Gusmian and contextual approach of Abdullah Saeed. This is compiled by using qualitative-descriptive method, by field research approximation. It shows: First, the methodology of KH Muhammad Shalahuddin Qur’anic interpretations is using is serial presentation based on serial of chapters in standard model of mushaf with detail presentation form. It is using reporting literary style. It is included in non-scientific writing form. It comes from non-academic spaces, but it uses thought interpretation method with semiotic analysis and contextual approach which full of social nuance; Second, the contextualization of KH Muhammad Shalahuddin Qur’anic interpretations appears in the Qur’an chapter al-Baqarah 30-35 which is included into instructional values among the five hierarchy values. By completing four stages which are formulated by Abdullah Saeed, KH. Muhammad Shalahuddin contextualizes the comprehension to the verses with various social contemporary common accidents around the boarding school. He directs the social wisdom from the verses for any problems today. Keywords: Methodology, Contextualization, KH. Muhammad Shalahuddin

TADARUS AL-QUR’AN BULAN RAMADAN: Studi Living Quran di Musala Al-Huda Desa Janti Jogoroto Jombang Fikri Fanani; Luthfi Raziq
Jurnal Studi Qur'an dan Tafsir Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): Juni
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, Fakultas Ushuluddin, Universitas Annuqayah (UA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59005/jsqt.v2i1.239

Abstract For Muslims, the Qur'an serves not only as a guide to life but also as a holy book that is read. Reading the Qur'an with tartil is highly recommended by the Prophet to his followers and is rewarded. Currently, the recitation of the Qur'an is expressed in various ways. These include reciting Surah Yusuf and Maryam to pregnant women, reciting Surah Yaasin in social gatherings, reciting the entire Qur'an, and reciting it at different times and locations. For example, the habit of practising Qur'anic 'Tadarus' in schools every morning, reciting it in people's homes every Thursday, in orphanages every day, and in Musala or Mosque every Ramadan. This research aims to explore the phenomenon of Qur'anic Tadarus every Ramadan in Musala Al-Huda Janti. This research aims to uncover the underlying noumena of this phenomenon and examine the variations in Qur'anic recitation across different locations, including differences in characteristics, management procedures, and implementation. Keywords: Tadarus Al-Qur'an, Ramadan, Musala al-Huda

AFTER AMIN: Hijab in Egyptian Feminists Exegesis Nur Fadiah Anisah; Ahmad Fauzi; Luthfi Raziq
Jurnal Studi Qur'an dan Tafsir Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Desember
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, Fakultas Ushuluddin, Universitas Annuqayah (UA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59005/jsqt.v2i2.246

Abstract The statement says that the hijab was an obstacle to women's development during colonialism in Egypt sparked a long discussion about the wearing of the hijab at that time, especially after Qasim Amin conveyed it in his book entitled Tahrīr al-Mar'ah (1899). On the other hand, the hijab also paved the way for the emergence of feminist discourse among Egyptian society. This article discusses the hijab discourse in interpretation (tafsīr) in Egypt after the controversy caused by the publication of Qasim Amin's book. This research shows that there are two conflicting tendencies of thinking about women, especially in the wearing of hijab. The first group thinks that the hijab is a barrier to women's development. While the second group considers the hijab is not a determining factor for women's progress. This tendency has genealogical roots to imperialism in Egypt. Using Miriam Cooke's theory of feminism which does not only refer to feminist actions and activism, but also thoughts and seeks to change perceptions of women's social roles and responsibilities, this article analyse at how the hijab discourse in two interpretations published after Tahrīr al-Mar'ah, each written by an Egyptian feminist woman. Focusing on two tafsir, namely al-Sufūr wa al-Hijāb written by Nazirah Zainuddin (1928) and Nazarāt fī Kitābillah written by Zaynab Ghazali (1994), this article elaborates on the verses of the hijab which are interpreted in these two books and sees that – to borrow Amina Wadud's term – prior text cannot be separated from the mufassir. This article concludes that the interpretation carried out by the two women bring the ideology of the feminist groups of the two interpreters, namely the Egyptian Feminist Union (EFU) and the Muslim Ladies Association (MLA). In a broader scope, this also cannot be separated from the history of British imperialism in Egypt, along with the discourse of feminism brought by the imperialists. Keywords: After Amin, Hijab, Feminist-Interpreter

TAFSIR AYAT-AYAT KAUNIYAH: Studi Komparasi Pemikiran Dr. Zakir Naik dan Dr. Maurice Bucaille M. Rifaki; Luthfi Raziq; Abdul Azis
Jurnal Studi Qur'an dan Tafsir Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): Desember
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, Fakultas Ushuluddin, Universitas Annuqayah (UA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59005/jsqt.v3i2.540

An assumption, that al-Quran is in accord with every era and place, has been proven by some researchers, thinkers, and interpreters, acknowledging that the al-Quran is in accordance with the development of modern knowledge/science. Loads of discovered findings lately have been written in al-Quran 14 centuries ago. Among those researchers, thinkers, and interpreters are Dr. Zakir Naik and Dr. Maurice Bucaille, proving it through their research and interpreting results on al-Quran and science. This research is meant to dig three things up: first, how is the interpretation of both mentioned researchers concerning kauniyah verses? Second, how suitable are their interpretations for the al-Quran interpreting principles? This research uses a comparative method, analyzing the foremost works of both researchers: “The Bible, The Qur’an, and Science” by Dr. Maurice Bucaille and several speeches as well as the scientific writings made by Dr. Zakir Naik. The used theoretical approach is scientific interpretation theory, analyzing how kauniyah verses are interpreted in modern science framework. The research findings aver that Dr. Maurice Bucaile emphasizes the scientific validity of al-Quran by drawing attention to the verses fitting the modern findings in biology and genetics; besides, Dr. Zakir Naik shows apologetic aspects in maintaining al-Quran righteousness through his scientific debate with non-Moslem view. It could be understood, in both interpretations of analyzing kauniyah verses, that the method and the principles they use are mostly according to the principles by the former ulama of exegesis, despite that there are some they don’t use; however, still, it can be said that both researchers are in the way how an interpreter should be.

TAFSIR AYAT-AYAT VEGETARIAN Immamah; Luthfi Raziq
Jurnal Studi Qur'an dan Tafsir Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Juni
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, Fakultas Ushuluddin, Universitas Annuqayah (UA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59005/jsqt.v3i1.541

Both al-Quran and hadits are considered capable of being the guidance for the various problems of humans, including dietary habits. In spite of the fact that the term” vegetarian” is inexplicitly mentioned in al-Quran, the basic concepts concerning health and the welfare of the body are reflected within lots of verses. Regarding vegetarian dietary habits are still considered ineffective by some people due to a lack of deep understanding, this comprehension needs further research. This research aims to discuss the vegetarian concept from the perspective of al-Quran as the rahmatan lil 'alamin religion teaches people about welfare life. This research is a literature review with interpretative content analysis as a data analysis method to know the social events in accord with the interpretation of verses concerning vegetarianism; hence, this research can answer the problems well. This research is aimed to analyze the interpretations of ulama concerning verses about vegetarianism. From this research, it is concluded that instead of making vegetarian dietary habits an obligation, al-Quran regards it as an advisable choice for health. Vegetarians think that the reason for health is relevant and in accord with Islamic values, all the more that health is significant to support daily life activity. This research also found that some vegetarian dietary habits need to be mulled over in the context of al-Quran and to be in accordance with Islamic values.

Title

Found 7 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 7 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 7 Documents
Search