Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Indonesian Perspective
Yusep Ginanjar
Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Sinergi Kementerian Luar Negeri dan Kementerian Pertahanan dalam Politik Luar Negeri Indonesia Agus Subagyo; Yusep Ginanjar
Indonesian Perspective Vol 5, No 1: (Januari-Juni 2020), hlm. 1-117
Publisher : Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (870.074 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/ip.v5i1.30195

Abstract

In the history of Indonesia’s foreign policy, there are often differences in attitudes between the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Defense in responding to international issues. The Ministry of Defense seems to act unilaterally and pays little attention to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in expressing attitudes and views regarding Indonesia’s foreign policy. There are disagreements between two ministries that cause polemics and pros and cons in government circles which eventually evaporate in public space. This paper analyzes the lack of synergy between the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in addressing international problems, which seem to work independently. This paper argues that a one-door policy in Indonesian foreign policy is needed, where the Ministry of Foreign Affairs must be positioned as the only door in the formulation and implementation of foreign policy, which the Ministry of Defense must submit to and comply with and synergy with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in foreign policy issues.
Differences and Points of Reference of Ood in the Perspective of Procedural Law of the State Administrative Court and Civil Procedure Law Elfran Bima Muttaqin; Gracesy Prisela Christy; Yusep Ginanjar; Andi Sri Rezky Wulandari; Mira Nila Kusuma Dewi
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i1.6349

Abstract

This study aims to examine the differences and tangents related to the Object of Dispute (OOD) in the perspective of the State Administrative Court (PTUN) Procedural Law and the Civil Procedure Law. In judicial practice, the determination of OOD is crucial because it concerns absolute authority between two different judicial regimes. This research uses a normative juridical method with a legislative and conceptual approach, and is analysed qualitatively. The results of the study show that although the PTUN and the civil courts both handle legal disputes, the fundamental differences lie in the type of legal subject, the nature of the object of the dispute, and the underlying principles. On the other hand, there are potential tangents in the case of objects that are civil in nature but are issued by state administrative bodies or officials, which gives rise to jurisdictional overlaps. Therefore, it is necessary to affirm norms and harmonize the regulation of absolute authority to avoid legal dualism that is detrimental to justice seekers. This research makes a theoretical and practical contribution in strengthening the boundaries of the absolute competence of the judiciary in Indonesia
Co-Authors Agus Subagyo Andi Sri Rezky Wulandari Elfran Bima Muttaqin Gracesy Prisela Christy Mira Nila Kusuma Dewi