Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

TESTING THE OMNIBUS LAW CONCEPT IN LEGAL THEORY: EVALUATING ITS EFFECTIVENESS AS A TOOL FOR SOCIAL ENGINEERING Purwanda, Sunardi; Wiwin, Wiwin; Pransisto, Johamran; Musran, Andi
Indonesia Private Law Review Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/iplr.v5i1.3370

Abstract

This research examines the enactment of Law Number 6 of 2023, which formalizes Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 on Job Creation. The law reflects the Indonesian government's efforts to create and expand employment opportunities. However, it is crucial to investigate whether these efforts align with the broader interests of the community or merely serve the ruling elite's agendas. This study assesses whether the law, with its various mechanisms, effectively addresses social conditions in line with the government's objectives—such as reducing unemployment, accommodating new workers, and fostering the growth of cooperatives and MSMEs—or whether it diverges from these goals. A socio-legal approach is employed to analyze whether the government's interests genuinely reflect the community's needs.
LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE CONTROVERSY OVER COPYRIGHT ROYALTIES FOR SONGS AND MUSIC IN INDONESIA Musran, Andi; Muhammad Sabir; Sunardi Purwanda; Bakhtiar Tijjang; Aksah Kasim
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the controversy surrounding song and music copyright royalties in Indonesia and identify the factors contributing to the suboptimal fulfillment of royalty rights for creators. The research method used is normative legal research with an analytical and comparative approach, comparing the royalty management systems in Indonesia with those in the United States. The results indicate that the main problems lie in the lack of transparency of the National Collective Management Institution (LMKN), a weak oversight system, and the suboptimal integrated song and music database. Furthermore, the Indonesian royalty management system still uses a collective approach, which is considered inefficient and does not provide fair legal certainty for creators. Meanwhile, the United States has implemented more transparent and flexible systems, such as direct licensing and technology-based management. This research contributes to providing recommendations for improving the royalty management system in Indonesia to make it more transparent, accountable, and equitable for all parties involved in the music industry.
PERBANDINGAN PENGATURAN HUKUM MENGENAI TINDAKAN ABORSI MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG KESEHATAN DAN KUHP NASIONAL Sakir, Nurul Sapitri; Purwanda, Sunardi; Phireri, Phireri; Musran, Andi
UIR Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): UIR Law Review
Publisher : UIR Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25299/uirlrev.2024.vol8(1).16165

Abstract

Tindakan aborsi merupakan salah satu tindak pidana yang diatur dalam berbagai peraturanperundang-undangan di Indonesia. Indonesia, salah satunya adalah Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2009tentang Kesehatan, atau disingkat UU Kesehatan. Selain UU Kesehatan, pengaturan mengenai aborsi jugaterdapat dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana atauyang dikenal dengan sebutan KUHP. KUHP Nasional. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaanpengaturan terkait aborsi terhadap korban perkosaan menurut UU Kesehatan dan KUHP Nasional. KitabUndang-Undang Hukum Pidana Nasional. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalahpenelitian hukum normatif. hukum normatif. Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penulisan ini adalahpendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan perbandingan. pendekatan perundang-undangan danpendekatan perbandingan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapat beberapa persamaan danperbedaan mengenai pengaturan hukum mengenai aborsi khususnya terhadap korban perkosaan. aborsikhususnya terhadap korban perkosaan. Perbuatan aborsi dalam Undang-Undang Kesehatan diatur dalamPasal 75, 76, 77 dan 194 dengan ancaman pidana penjara paling lama 10 tahun dan denda paling banyakRp. 1.000.000.000,- (satu milyar rupiah), sedangkan aborsi dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidanadiatur dalam pasal 463, 464 dan 465 dengan ancaman pidana penjara paling lama 4 (empat) tahun.