Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

ANALISIS ASPEK TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI PENERBITAN SERTIFIKAT HAK MILIK ATAS TANAH NEGARA Putra, Suardi Rahman; Rodliyah; Rina Rohayu Harun
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v6i2.1021

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the modus operandi of Corruption in the Issuance of Land Ownership Certificates for State Land and to analyze the considerations of judges in sentencing for Corruption in the Issuance of Land Ownership Certificates for State Land based on the verdict of the Mataram District Court Number 32/Pid.Sus.TPK/2017/PN.Mtr. The problem of corruption in Indonesia is spreading across all aspects of life and requires serious attention from the government, especially in preventing its further proliferation. A corruption case occurred in East Lombok Regency, specifically in Sekaroh Village, Keruak Sub-district. In this case, the defendants, who were Civil Servants in the Land Office of East Lombok Regency, were found guilty of committing corruption under Article 3 of Law Number 31 of 1999 Jo. Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption, as they abused their authority to issue land ownership certificates within the Sekaroh forest area. The research adopts a qualitative normative approach. The researcher focuses on the corruption case in the Mataram District Court, Case Number 32/Pid.Sus.TPK/2017/PN.Mtr. The research method used is normative/legal doctrinal research, combining normative legal approach with the addition of various empirical elements. Abuse of position or authority is an act of using the authority possessed to favor or discriminate in favor of a group or individual while being discriminatory against other groups or individuals. In the legislation regarding corruption, the element of "Abuse of Authority" has been regulated and even becomes part of the core of the corruption offense. In Article 3 of Law Number 31 of 1999 Jo Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning.
Imposition Of Criminal Sanctions for Minor Criminal Actions of Theft (A Case On Judgement Number 826/Pid.B/2023/Pn.Mtr) Santi Mandasari; Rina Rohayu Harun; Firzhal Arzhi Jiwantara; Nurjannah Septyanun
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 3 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.4825

Abstract

The imposition of criminal sanctions for minor criminal actions, such as theft, presents a complex and multifaceted challenge for legal systems worldwide. This study examines the imposition of criminal sanctions for minor theft offenses, with a specific focus on the case adjudicated under Judgment Number 826/Pid.B/2023/Pn.Mtr. The research aims to analyze the legal reasoning behind the court's decision, the proportionality of the sanctions imposed, and the broader implications for the criminal justice system. Utilizing a qualitative approach, this study involves a detailed case analysis, reviewing court documents, and interviews with legal experts. Findings indicate that while the court adhered to statutory guidelines, there were significant considerations regarding the socio-economic background of the offender and the value of the stolen property. The study concludes that although the sanctions imposed were within legal parameters, there is a need for a more nuanced approach that considers restorative justice principles. This research contributes to the ongoing discourse on criminal justice reform, particularly concerning minor offenses, and advocates for policy adjustments that balance deterrence with rehabilitation.
The Interpretation of Article 127 of Law Number 35 of 2009 on Narcotics in Addressing Drug Abuse through Restorative Justice Made Wardika; Rina Rohayu Harun; Firzhal Arzhi Jiwantara
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 3 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.4890

Abstract

Narcotics crime refers to a range of illegal activities involving the distribution, purchase, sale, possession, and abuse of drugs without proper authorisation. These activities cause harm to both the broader community and the individuals involved. Restorative Justice has emerged as a response. Its primary focus is to resolve cases involving drug abusers who are addicted to narcotics. In addition to Restorative Justice, there is an alternative for rehabilitating narcotics abusers through the involvement of police investigators, the prosecutor's office, or decisions made by judges. The purpose of this study is to analyse the relationship between the interpretation and execution of Article 127 of Law No. 35 on Narcotics and Restorative Justice, based on literal interpretation. Based on the analyses, the enforcement of Article 127 of Law No. 35 of 2009 on Narcotics, which focuses on Restorative Justice, has been supported by multiple regulations. However, the law's implementation has not aligned with expected standards and legislation, leading to ambiguity in Article 112 and Article 127. This ambiguity creates opportunities for unscrupulous law enforcement to make illicit gains, increasing the incidence of drug-related offenses. The author proposes an immediate revision of Law No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics due to the ambiguity in the law's article parts and the current legal framework's inability to effectively curb opioid misuse.
Pemidanaan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Sektor Agraria Perspektif Kepastian Hukum Dan Keadilan Ihsan, Samsul; Rina Rohayu Harun; Yulias Erwin
Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jkh.v10i1.205

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis Bagaimana Tipologi Pemidanaan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Sektor Agraria dalam penerbitan sertifikat hak atas tanah nelayan Perspektif Kepastian Hukum Dan Keadilan dan Bagaimana penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana korupsi dalam penerbitan sertifikat tanah bagi nelayan di Indonesia dapat mewujudkan kepastian hukum yang berkeadilan, Metode yang digunakan adalah Penelitian hukum normatif yang mengkaji putusan pengadilan serta norma-norma hukum yang berlaku. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa korupsi dalam sektor agraria, terutama dalam penerbitan sertifikat tanah untuk nelayan, berdampak besar terhadap kepastian hukum dan keadilan. Berdasarkan analisis beberapa putusan Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Tipikor), penerapan kepastian hukum dan keadilan sangat penting untuk membangun kepercayaan publik terhadap sistem pertanahan di Indonesia. Penegakan hukum yang tegas terhadap pelaku korupsi dan pengembalian hak tanah yang diambil secara ilegal merupakan langkah penting untuk memastikan program pemerintah berjalan sesuai prinsip hukum yang berlaku. Penegakan hukum yang konsisten akan meningkatkan transparansi, akuntabilitas, serta kepercayaan publik terhadap sistem hukum, sekaligus memastikan perlindungan hak-hak nelayan dan meningkatkan keadilan sosial serta ekonomi. Oleh karena itu, penegakan hukum yang efektif tidak hanya menguntungkan pihak yang dirugikan langsung, tetapi juga memperkuat integritas sistem hukum dan menciptakan pemerintahan yang lebih akuntabel dan transparan.Kata kunci: Tindak pidana; korupsi; agraria; kepastian hukum; keadilan.
Optimalisasi Sistem Penilaian Pembinaan Narapidana Untuk Remisi Berbasis Keadilan Distributif Di Lapas Perempuan Mataram Dewanti, Yuvana; Rina Rohayu Harun; Firzhal Arzhi Jiwantara
Commerce Law Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Commerce Law
Publisher : Departement Business Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/commercelaw.v5i1.7328

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis optimalisasi Sistem Penilaian Pembinaan Narapidana (SPPN) sebagai indikator pemberian remisi serta mengidentifikasi kendala penerapan prinsip keadilan distributif di Lapas Perempuan Kelas III Mataram. Metode yang digunakan adalah normatif empiris, dengan pendekatan konseptual, perundang-undangan, kasus, dan sosiologis untuk mengkaji efektivitas hukum dan kebijakan pemasyarakatan dalam praktik lapangan.SPPN merupakan instrumen strategis dalam menilai kemajuan pembinaan narapidana secara objektif, sejalan dengan pergeseran paradigma pemasyarakatan dari pendekatan retributif ke rehabilitatif. Diterapkan berdasarkan Keputusan Dirjen Pemasyarakatan No. PAS-10.OT.02.02 Tahun 2021, SPPN di Lapas Perempuan Kelas III Mataram dijalankan oleh tim Wali Pemasyarakatan dan Asesor melalui penilaian berbasis data dan bukti. Penilaian ini mencakup observasi perilaku, wawancara, telaah dokumen, serta tes, dengan pendekatan yang terindividualisasi sesuai karakteristik masing-masing narapidana.Optimalisasi SPPN telah menunjukkan dampak positif, seperti meningkatnya transparansi, motivasi narapidana, serta efektivitas dalam pemberian remisi dan hak-hak lainnya. Namun demikian, penelitian ini menemukan sejumlah kendala signifikan yang menghambat prinsip keadilan distributif. Kendala tersebut meliputi subjektivitas petugas, keterbatasan data yang akurat dan lengkap, belum optimalnya digitalisasi, serta rendahnya kapasitas SDM. Selain itu, inkonsistensi antarunit, resistensi terhadap sistem baru, dan tantangan integrasi data dengan Balai Pemasyarakatan (Bapas) turut memperparah ketimpangan dalam penilaian.Oleh karena itu, diperlukan upaya pembenahan menyeluruh melalui penguatan infrastruktur, pelatihan petugas, standardisasi teknis, serta percepatan digitalisasi. Langkah ini penting agar SPPN dapat benar-benar menjadi alat evaluasi yang adil dan efektif dalam mendukung pemasyarakatan yang humanis dan berkeadilan.