Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Analysis of Understanding in Seismic – Resilient Infrastructure Planning in Vocational Student’s Civil Engineering Debataraja, Lisherly Reginancy; Silalahi, Oktavia Ully Artha; Sianturi, Fenny Novita Meysabed; Tarigan, Pagit Juni Sartika Br; Badriansyah, Dine Noviandri
International Journal of Research in Vocational Studies (IJRVOCAS) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2024): IJRVOCAS - Special Issues - International Conference on Science, Technology and
Publisher : Yayasan Ghalih Pelopor Pendidikan (Ghalih Foundation)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53893/ijrvocas.v3i4.44

Abstract

The analysis of understanding in Seismic-Resilient Infrastructure Planning among vocational students in civil engineering is indispensable for multifaceted reasons. This study employs a questionnaire validation test as a means of data collection, utilizing questionnaires to gather information. Simple random sampling was applied to select respondents from Medan State Polytechnic students in their 5th and 7th semesters. The questionnaire is designed to assess students' knowledge of earthquake-resistant infrastructure planning. The research is structured into three segments, focusing on the understanding of earthquake resistance management, structural earthquake resistance, and infrastructure earthquake resistance. The aspect of management seismic resilience understanding ranges from 3.22% to 9.65%. The highest understanding is observed in the awareness of quality control activities, the fifth assessment (9.65%). The lowest understanding is in reduce errors in the implementation of earthquake-resistant construction, the nineth assessment (3.22%). The aspect of structure seismic resilience understanding ranges from 2.78% to 9.48%. The highest understanding is observed in threaded reinforcement, the fourth assessment (9.48%). The lowest understanding is in earthquake-resistant house construction, the seventh assessment (2.78%). The aspect of infrastructure seismic resilience understanding ranges from 5.57% to 15.83%., The highest understanding is observed in earthquake-resistant foundations, the second assessment (15.83%). The lowest understanding is in post-disaster assessment approach, the fifth assessment (5.57%). These percentages likely represent the level of comprehension or proficiency of students in each respective aspect, with higher percentages indicating a better understanding. It is crucial to analyze these results collectively and over time to identify trends, strengths, and areas for improvement in the seismic resilience education provided to vocational civil engineering students.
ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN METODE MKJI 1997 DENGAN PKJI 2023 DALAM MENENTUKAN NILAI KAPASITAS JALAN PADA JALAN PERKOTAAN (STUDI KASUS: JL. DOKTOR MANSYUR) Br Tarigan, Pagit Juni Sartika; Sianturi, Fenny Novita Meysabed; Silalahi, Oktavia Ully Artha; Badriansyah, Dine Noviandri
RETENSI Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Retensi
Publisher : Jurusan Teknik Sipil Polnep

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31573/retensi.v5i2.998

Abstract

Road capacity is one of the things needed in the process of determining the level of road service. There are several data needed in the process of determining road capacity using both the MKJI 1997 and PKJI 2023 methods. These data are road width data, median conditions, shoulder width data, curb data, population data, number of vehicles crossing the road, and side friction data. All of this data can be obtained by conducting a direct survey at the review location. The review location is an urban road (Jl. Doktor Mansyur), Medan City, North Sumatra. In addition, vehicle types are also grouped because they will have an impact on the road section capacity value. Traffic volume and side friction surveys are carried out on weekdays and weekend. With the acquisition of road capacity values, the level of road service can be determined to be followed up if the road service level is no longer working according to the function of the road. After conducting a traffic survey and data processing, the road service level was obtained in category F due to very high side frictionconditions and dense activity on the road section.