Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.835
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Awang Long Law Review Teaching and Learning Journal of Mandalika (Teacher) Collegium Studiosum Journal
Nofarizal, Dedi
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
POLITIK HUKUM PERUBAHAN MATERI MUATAN UNDANG-UNDANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK (ITE) Ardiansah, Ardiansah; Nofarizal, Dedi; Putra P.R, Fransiskus; Hutagaol, Hendra Dm; Monarchi, Try Krisna
Teaching and Learning Journal of Mandalika (Teacher) e- ISSN 2721-9666 Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Institut Penelitian dan Pengembangan Mandalika Indonesia (IP2MI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Politik hukum perubahan materi muatan Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE) merupakan refleksi dari dinamika sosial, politik, dan teknologi yang berkembang di Indonesia. Sejak disahkan pertama kali pada tahun 2008, UU ITE telah mengalami beberapa revisi, yang terutama bertujuan untuk menyesuaikan dengan perkembangan teknologi informasi, serta merespons kritik dan kontroversi terkait penerapannya. Selanjutnya khusus untuk mengeluarkan pendapat, berkomunikasi dapat dilakukan menggunakan berbagai sarana, ternasuk dalam hal ini media informasi yang diatur dalam Pasal 14 Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia yaitu: 1. Setiap orang berhak untuk berkomunikasi dan memperoleh informasi yang diperlukan untuk mengembangkan pribadinya dan lingkungan sosialnya. 2. Setiap orang berhak untuk mencari, memperoleh, memiliki, menyimpan, mengolah dan menyampaikan informasi dengan menggunakan segala jenis sarana yang tersedia. Melalui penjelasan tersebut tentang hak berpendapat, pemerintah telah menjamin dengan UUD NRI Tahun 1945 dan Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia. Namun yang menjadi polemik terhadap kebebasan berpendapat adalah hadirnya Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (selanjutnya disebut UU ITE) yang dianggap dapat mengancam hak kebebasan berpendapat. Metode yang dipergunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa Politik hukum perubahan materi muatan UU ITE mencerminkan upaya pemerintah untuk menyesuaikan regulasi dengan dinamika teknologi dan sosial yang terus berkembang. Meskipun perubahan-perubahan tersebut bertujuan untuk menyeimbangkan antara kebebasan berekspresi dan tanggung jawab hukum, serta memperjelas ketentuan yang dianggap multitafsir, tantangan dalam implementasi dan potensi penyalahgunaan masih menjadi isu yang perlu terus diwaspadai dan diperbaiki. Perubahan UU ITE harus terus diarahkan untuk menciptakan regulasi yang adil, transparan, dan melindungi hak-hak asasi manusia di era digital. Dalam hal ini bagi pengguna internet yang tidak memahami betul peraturan mengenai informasi dan transaksi elektronik akan dengan mudahnya terjerat Pasal UU ITE jika menggunakan media sosial tanpa mengerti batasan yang dilarang, dalam hal ini UU ITE bisa digunakan menjadi “senjata” penguasa untuk menjatuhkan lawan politik yang dianggap mengganggu elektabilitas ataupun kepentingan penguasa, sikologi : dalam hal ini beberapa Pasal “multitafsir” dalam UU ITE bisa menjerat korban yang berakibat pada kondisi psikis korban maupun keluarga korban.
PROTECTION OF VICTIMS OF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS Yusuf DM, Mohd.; Nofarizal, Dedi; Putra, Fransiskus; Hutagaol, Hendra Dm; Monarchi, Try Krisna
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v6i2.1256

Abstract

The crime of genocide is often associated with crimes against humanity but when viewed in depth the crime of genocide is different from crimes against humanity, where the crime of genocide is aimed at groups such as nations, races, ethnicities or religions while crimes against humanity are aimed at citizens and civilians. The demand for the resolution of cases of human rights violations has prompted the birth of Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights which was later followed by Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning the Human Rights Court which is intended to answer various problems of human rights violations, especially gross human rights violations. Article 7 of the Human Rights Court Law states that the crime of genocide is a crime that violates gross human rights because it is committed by killing, causing severe suffering, extermination, coercion by groups and even the forcible transfer of children from one group to another. Thus the human rights court law expressly provides threats to the perpetrators. The method used is normative legal research. Based on the results of the research, it is known that the Crime of Genocide and its Implications in Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights that the crime of genocide is one of the most serious forms of human rights violations, involving systematic efforts to destroy certain groups based on ethnicity, religion, or race. Law No. 39/1999 on Human Rights has not specifically and in detail regulated the crime of genocide and the elements of the crime. This has led to a lack of a strong and comprehensive legal framework to prosecute perpetrators of genocide, as well as provide justice and legal certainty for victims.
PENYELESAIAN HUKUM KEADILAN RESTORATIF TERHADAP PELAKU PENGANIAYAAN Nofarizal, Dedi; Yusuf, Yusuf; Pardede, Rudi
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v7i2.1350

Abstract

The issues above are rooted in the focus on a criminal act and the justice achieved through resolving a criminal case. The perspective on the meaning of a crime and punishment adopted in the current traditional criminal justice system is that “a crime is a violation of the state, defined by lawbreaking and guilt,” which is rigid and does not allow freedom for victims and perpetrators to resolve their cases. Based on research findings, it is known that the implementation of restorative justice for perpetrators of assault in the jurisdiction of Dumai Police, based on the Regulation of the Indonesian National Police Number 8 of 2021 concerning the Handling of Criminal Acts Based on Restorative Justice, has not been running effectively. Many cases between victims and perpetrators have not reached an agreement, making the process only viable if both parties, the victim and the perpetrator, agree to resolve the issue through restorative justice. The obstacles include the influence of third parties from the victim's family on the victim, the involvement of interested parties in the matter, the lack of understanding of restorative justice among the community, and communication barriers between the perpetrator and the victim. Efforts to overcome these obstacles involve providing input to victims and perpetrators regarding the issue, preventing interference from uninterested parties, increasing public understanding of restorative justice, and improving communication between the perpetrator and the victim.
PENYELESAIAN HUKUM KEADILAN RESTORATIF TERHADAP PELAKU PENGANIAYAAN Nofarizal, Dedi; Yusuf, Yusuf; Pardede, Rudi
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v7i2.1350

Abstract

The issues above are rooted in the focus on a criminal act and the justice achieved through resolving a criminal case. The perspective on the meaning of a crime and punishment adopted in the current traditional criminal justice system is that “a crime is a violation of the state, defined by lawbreaking and guilt,” which is rigid and does not allow freedom for victims and perpetrators to resolve their cases. Based on research findings, it is known that the implementation of restorative justice for perpetrators of assault in the jurisdiction of Dumai Police, based on the Regulation of the Indonesian National Police Number 8 of 2021 concerning the Handling of Criminal Acts Based on Restorative Justice, has not been running effectively. Many cases between victims and perpetrators have not reached an agreement, making the process only viable if both parties, the victim and the perpetrator, agree to resolve the issue through restorative justice. The obstacles include the influence of third parties from the victim's family on the victim, the involvement of interested parties in the matter, the lack of understanding of restorative justice among the community, and communication barriers between the perpetrator and the victim. Efforts to overcome these obstacles involve providing input to victims and perpetrators regarding the issue, preventing interference from uninterested parties, increasing public understanding of restorative justice, and improving communication between the perpetrator and the victim.
PROTECTION OF VICTIMS OF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS Yusuf DM, Mohd.; Nofarizal, Dedi; Putra, Fransiskus; Hutagaol, Hendra Dm; Monarchi, Try Krisna
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v6i2.1256

Abstract

The crime of genocide is often associated with crimes against humanity but when viewed in depth the crime of genocide is different from crimes against humanity, where the crime of genocide is aimed at groups such as nations, races, ethnicities or religions while crimes against humanity are aimed at citizens and civilians. The demand for the resolution of cases of human rights violations has prompted the birth of Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights which was later followed by Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning the Human Rights Court which is intended to answer various problems of human rights violations, especially gross human rights violations. Article 7 of the Human Rights Court Law states that the crime of genocide is a crime that violates gross human rights because it is committed by killing, causing severe suffering, extermination, coercion by groups and even the forcible transfer of children from one group to another. Thus the human rights court law expressly provides threats to the perpetrators. The method used is normative legal research. Based on the results of the research, it is known that the Crime of Genocide and its Implications in Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights that the crime of genocide is one of the most serious forms of human rights violations, involving systematic efforts to destroy certain groups based on ethnicity, religion, or race. Law No. 39/1999 on Human Rights has not specifically and in detail regulated the crime of genocide and the elements of the crime. This has led to a lack of a strong and comprehensive legal framework to prosecute perpetrators of genocide, as well as provide justice and legal certainty for victims.
Co-Authors Ardiansah, Ardiansah Hutagaol, Hendra Dm Monarchi, Try Krisna Pardede, Rudi Putra P.R, Fransiskus Putra, Fransiskus Yusuf DM, Mohd. Yusuf Yusuf