Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum Awang Long Law Review Teaching and Learning Journal of Mandalika (Teacher) Collegium Studiosum Journal
Monarchi, Try Krisna
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PENGGUNA JASA TITIP (JASTIP) MELALUI MEDIA ONLINE Monarchi, Try Krisna; Ismi, Hayatul; Dasrol, Dasrol
Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum Vol 7, No 2 (2020): Juli - Desember 2020
Publisher : Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Development of online shopping systems has created new business opportunities, one of which is known by the public as entrusted services. A entrusted service is a job in and out of a shop, mall or wholesaler with certain brands according to the desires of customers who believe in their services. The goods you are looking for are not only at the local level, there is often a demand for goods from abroad. The entrusted service profession uses a very simple working mechanism. The position of an entrusted service is a third party between the seller and the buyer, but the main task of entrusting services is the shopper for the entrusters. Jastip, which is short for "entrusted services", has recently become a widespread phenomenon in Indonesia.The law does not in detail regulate this online entrusted service activity, but in the laws and regulations in Indonesia Online buying and selling transactions are regulated in Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Technology Electronics and Government Regulation Number 71 of 2019 concerning Implementation of Electronic Systems and Transactions and Government Regulation Number 71 of 2019 concerning Implementation of Electronic Systems and Transactions. In its implementation, it regulates Electronic Contracts at least containing certain things, one of which is provisions that give the injured party the right to return goods and / or request product replacement if there are hidden defects.In the implementation of this entrusted service business activity through online media, a problem occurs when consumers who purchase goods using entrusted services experience hidden defects in goods purchased from the entrusted service provider and the seller refuses to provide compensation for the change of goods and / or money changes accordingly. applicable rules. This is certainly contrary to the Consumer Protection Law Number 8 of 1999. In its implementation, business actors have the principle of responsibility in the Consumer Protection law. In cases of violations of consumer rights, careful analysis is needed in analyzing who should be responsible and to what extent the responsibility can be passed on to the parties concerned.The purpose of this study is to determine the mechanism for legal protection and settlement of entrusted service users through online media. And as a suggestion from the author, so that business actors can pay attention to the responsibilities of business actors in carrying out their business activities in accordance with government regulations so that problems do not occur that result in losses to consumers who use these buying and selling services at a later date.Keywords: Legal Protection, Personal Shopper, Online Media, Costumer.
POLITIK HUKUM PERUBAHAN MATERI MUATAN UNDANG-UNDANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK (ITE) Ardiansah, Ardiansah; Nofarizal, Dedi; Putra P.R, Fransiskus; Hutagaol, Hendra Dm; Monarchi, Try Krisna
Teaching and Learning Journal of Mandalika (Teacher) e- ISSN 2721-9666 Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Institut Penelitian dan Pengembangan Mandalika Indonesia (IP2MI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Politik hukum perubahan materi muatan Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE) merupakan refleksi dari dinamika sosial, politik, dan teknologi yang berkembang di Indonesia. Sejak disahkan pertama kali pada tahun 2008, UU ITE telah mengalami beberapa revisi, yang terutama bertujuan untuk menyesuaikan dengan perkembangan teknologi informasi, serta merespons kritik dan kontroversi terkait penerapannya. Selanjutnya khusus untuk mengeluarkan pendapat, berkomunikasi dapat dilakukan menggunakan berbagai sarana, ternasuk dalam hal ini media informasi yang diatur dalam Pasal 14 Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia yaitu: 1. Setiap orang berhak untuk berkomunikasi dan memperoleh informasi yang diperlukan untuk mengembangkan pribadinya dan lingkungan sosialnya. 2. Setiap orang berhak untuk mencari, memperoleh, memiliki, menyimpan, mengolah dan menyampaikan informasi dengan menggunakan segala jenis sarana yang tersedia. Melalui penjelasan tersebut tentang hak berpendapat, pemerintah telah menjamin dengan UUD NRI Tahun 1945 dan Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia. Namun yang menjadi polemik terhadap kebebasan berpendapat adalah hadirnya Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (selanjutnya disebut UU ITE) yang dianggap dapat mengancam hak kebebasan berpendapat. Metode yang dipergunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa Politik hukum perubahan materi muatan UU ITE mencerminkan upaya pemerintah untuk menyesuaikan regulasi dengan dinamika teknologi dan sosial yang terus berkembang. Meskipun perubahan-perubahan tersebut bertujuan untuk menyeimbangkan antara kebebasan berekspresi dan tanggung jawab hukum, serta memperjelas ketentuan yang dianggap multitafsir, tantangan dalam implementasi dan potensi penyalahgunaan masih menjadi isu yang perlu terus diwaspadai dan diperbaiki. Perubahan UU ITE harus terus diarahkan untuk menciptakan regulasi yang adil, transparan, dan melindungi hak-hak asasi manusia di era digital. Dalam hal ini bagi pengguna internet yang tidak memahami betul peraturan mengenai informasi dan transaksi elektronik akan dengan mudahnya terjerat Pasal UU ITE jika menggunakan media sosial tanpa mengerti batasan yang dilarang, dalam hal ini UU ITE bisa digunakan menjadi “senjata” penguasa untuk menjatuhkan lawan politik yang dianggap mengganggu elektabilitas ataupun kepentingan penguasa, sikologi : dalam hal ini beberapa Pasal “multitafsir” dalam UU ITE bisa menjerat korban yang berakibat pada kondisi psikis korban maupun keluarga korban.
PROTECTION OF VICTIMS OF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS Yusuf DM, Mohd.; Nofarizal, Dedi; Putra, Fransiskus; Hutagaol, Hendra Dm; Monarchi, Try Krisna
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v6i2.1256

Abstract

The crime of genocide is often associated with crimes against humanity but when viewed in depth the crime of genocide is different from crimes against humanity, where the crime of genocide is aimed at groups such as nations, races, ethnicities or religions while crimes against humanity are aimed at citizens and civilians. The demand for the resolution of cases of human rights violations has prompted the birth of Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights which was later followed by Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning the Human Rights Court which is intended to answer various problems of human rights violations, especially gross human rights violations. Article 7 of the Human Rights Court Law states that the crime of genocide is a crime that violates gross human rights because it is committed by killing, causing severe suffering, extermination, coercion by groups and even the forcible transfer of children from one group to another. Thus the human rights court law expressly provides threats to the perpetrators. The method used is normative legal research. Based on the results of the research, it is known that the Crime of Genocide and its Implications in Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights that the crime of genocide is one of the most serious forms of human rights violations, involving systematic efforts to destroy certain groups based on ethnicity, religion, or race. Law No. 39/1999 on Human Rights has not specifically and in detail regulated the crime of genocide and the elements of the crime. This has led to a lack of a strong and comprehensive legal framework to prosecute perpetrators of genocide, as well as provide justice and legal certainty for victims.
PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PERJUDIAN Monarchi, Try Krisna; Yetti; Triana, Yeni
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v8i1.1651

Abstract

The Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations Law (UUK-PKPU) provides space for debtors to postpone debt payments and restructure their obligations. However, the existence of a 90-day stay provision in the PKPU process has caused serious problems with the rights of creditors holding mortgage rights, especially in efforts to carry out collateral execution. This study aims to analyze the application of the provision in the context of legal protection of creditors, review its compatibility with the principles of legal certainty and justice, and criticize the potential for legal smuggling that may occur in practice. Through a normative approach and literature study, including linking the conflict of norms between UUK-PKPU and the Mortgage Rights Law (UUHT), this article shows that the dominance of the lex posterior derogat legi priori principle in this context often ignores substantive justice for creditors. The results of this study emphasize the need for legal reform of the PKPU stay period and the balancing of protection between debtors and creditors in the process of postponing debt payment obligations. These findings reinforce the urgency of regulatory reorganization to prevent irregularities in the implementation of bankruptcy law in Indonesia.
PROTECTION OF VICTIMS OF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS Yusuf DM, Mohd.; Nofarizal, Dedi; Putra, Fransiskus; Hutagaol, Hendra Dm; Monarchi, Try Krisna
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v6i2.1256

Abstract

The crime of genocide is often associated with crimes against humanity but when viewed in depth the crime of genocide is different from crimes against humanity, where the crime of genocide is aimed at groups such as nations, races, ethnicities or religions while crimes against humanity are aimed at citizens and civilians. The demand for the resolution of cases of human rights violations has prompted the birth of Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights which was later followed by Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning the Human Rights Court which is intended to answer various problems of human rights violations, especially gross human rights violations. Article 7 of the Human Rights Court Law states that the crime of genocide is a crime that violates gross human rights because it is committed by killing, causing severe suffering, extermination, coercion by groups and even the forcible transfer of children from one group to another. Thus the human rights court law expressly provides threats to the perpetrators. The method used is normative legal research. Based on the results of the research, it is known that the Crime of Genocide and its Implications in Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights that the crime of genocide is one of the most serious forms of human rights violations, involving systematic efforts to destroy certain groups based on ethnicity, religion, or race. Law No. 39/1999 on Human Rights has not specifically and in detail regulated the crime of genocide and the elements of the crime. This has led to a lack of a strong and comprehensive legal framework to prosecute perpetrators of genocide, as well as provide justice and legal certainty for victims.
Co-Authors , Dasrol Ardiansah, Ardiansah Hayatul Ismi Hutagaol, Hendra Dm Nofarizal, Dedi Putra P.R, Fransiskus Putra, Fransiskus Triana, Yeni Yetti Yusuf DM, Mohd.