Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Family Vulnerability and Children’ Nutritional Status during COVID-19 Pandemic Yusuf, Andi Mukramin; Tenrisau, Dhihram; Hidayanti, Healthy; Ibrahim, Abdul Haris; Bahar, Ardiansyah; Sarifudin, Sarifudin; Tahir, Yoesrianto; Adhyanti, Adhyanti; Alfiah, Elma
Journal of Public Health for Tropical and Coastal Region Vol 5, No 2 (2022): Journal of Public Health for Tropical and Coastal Region
Publisher : Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jphtcr.v5i2.13758

Abstract

Introduction: COVID-19 infected millions of people and became the main mortality worldwide. COVID-19 also affected other health problems, including nutritional problems. This study aimed to find the factors that affected the nutritional and socio-economic status during the COVID-19 pandemic in a neighborhood of DKI Jakarta.Methods: This study utilized a cross-sectional design. Total sampling method on all families who had children in the 9th Neighborhood, Cawang Sub-District, DKI Jakarta was used. A total of 72 families were involved in this study, and the informants of this study were mothers of under five children. This study utilized a modified questionnaire from the Indonesian National Socio-Economic Survey (Susenas) and the Indonesian Nutritional Status Study (SSGI). This study utilized bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis.Results: From all of 72 families with children, it was found that eight children were wasting. The Job-Loss (PHK) has an OR of 37.8 (95%CI: 5.87-748.53; p=0.001), while below poverty line had an OR of 14.24 (95%CI: 3.55-170.35; p=0.004) to be wasted. The multivariate analysis had included covariates such as parental occupation, parental education, and antenatal care (ANC). Job-Loss and Below Poverty Line were the main factors in increasing the risk of malnutrition cases after controlled by covariates. Conclusion: The decrease in socio-economic status of a family during the pandemic, increased the risk of wasted children. Improvements in policy interventions and socio-economic aids are necessary to improve the nutritional status of under five children in the lower-middle class during the COVID-19 pandemic.
ANALYSIS IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SUPERVISION ROLE COMMISSION IX OF DPR RI IN THE HEALTH PROGRAM FOR THE 2014-2019 PERIOD: CASE STUDY IN THE PRIMARY CARE DOCTOR PROGRAM Bahar, Ardiansyah; Achadi, Anhari
Journal of Indonesian Health Policy and Administration Vol. 6, No. 3
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Prolonged health problems have been recurring for a long time have raised questions about health program and its supervisory. The supervisory function carried out by Commission IX of the DPR RI on its partners from the government continues to be carried out in various ways. However, analysis has never been conducted to assess whether the various supervisory activities have been effective. This study uses a qualitative method based on phenomena, symptoms, facts, or social informants. Informants are determined directly based on the principles of appropriateness and adequacy. The data is then converted into transcript form, then analyzed, and a Logical Framework is created. This study shows that Commission IX's supervision of the Primary Care Doctor (Dokter Layanan Primer/DLP) Program is ineffective because the program is regulated in the Medical Education Law which is a product of Commission X DPR RI and involves The Ministry of Research and Education (Kemenristekdikti), which is not a working partner of Commission IX DPR RI. Supervision by Commission IX of DPR RI on work partners can positively influence partners' performance improvement. However, it is difficult to conclude that the increase in performance is entirely due to oversight from Commission IX of DPR RI. The supervisory function of Commission IX DPR RI for the DLP Program did not work effectively because the program was regulated in the Medical Education Law which was a product of Commission X DPR RI and involved Kemenristekdikti which was not a working partner of Commission IX DPR RI.