Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Gizi dan Pangan Jurnal Media Gizi Indonesia (MGI) TEKNOLOGI PANGAN : Media Informasi dan Komunikasi Ilmiah Teknologi Pertanian
Darningsih, Sri
Jurusan Gizi, Politeknik Kesehatan Kementerian Kemenkes Padang, Sumatera Barat
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Health Professions

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
FORMULASI TEH CAMELIA-MURBEI DENGAN BUBUK JAHE (Zingiber officinale) DAN ASAM JAWA (Tamarindus indica, L.) SEBAGAI MINUMAN KESEHATAN UNTUK MENINGKATKAN RESPON IMUN TIKUS Sri Darningsih; Clara Meliyanti Kusharto; Sri Anna Marliyati; Dadan Rohdiana
Jurnal Gizi dan Pangan Vol. 3 No. 2 (2008)
Publisher : Food and Nutrition Society of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (141.806 KB) | DOI: 10.25182/jgp.2008.3.2.61-70

Abstract

The Camelia-mulberry tea has a big potential to becomes a healthy beverage according to its bioactive components, and added by red ginger powder and tamarind. Those ingredients may increase immunity againts various diseases. The aims of this study was to develop formula of a healthy beverage contained of two varieties of leaves (camelia and mulberry), with Ginger (Zingiber officinale) and Tamarind (Tamarindus indica, L.)   This main research  used mice strain Spraque Dawley, 1.5-2 month old with  weight 75–105 gram. The instruments used in this study were tea maker, organoleptic test and ELISA test. The experimental design used factorial complete random design with 5 groups, where on each group consists of 5 mouse, with two selected variables of the best camelia-mulberry tea, i.e., multikaulis enzymatic oxidation + Gambung 7 enzimatic non-oxidation; bulk tea (Tea A) with difference time observation ( 0, 2 and 4 weeks).  The given dosage was 1 ml/100 gram mice weight, with different concentration of camelia-mulberry tea i.e. 3, 6, 9, and 12 gram/ml. The statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA) shows that a significant different exist for the time observation of a mice serum IgG (p<0.05).  Followed by Tukey test, which  shows that a significant differences exist on IgG average at the beginning and after  the 2nd weeks of treatment, and the 2nd weeks vs 4th weeks treatment.
Development of Instant Porridge Complementary Feeding with Catfish Flour and Pumpkin Flour Substitution: Pengembangan Makanan Pendamping Air Susu Ibu (MP-ASI) Bubur Instant dengan Substitusi Tepung Ikan Lele dan Tepung Labu Kuning Sri Darningsih; Nur Ahmad Habibi Habibi; Zurni Nurman; Ismanilda Ismanilda
Media Gizi Indonesia Vol. 18 No. 1 (2023): MEDIA GIZI INDONESIA (NATIONAL NUTRITION JOURNAL)
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/mgi.v18i1.94-102

Abstract

The problem of malnutrition in infants and toddlers led to growth and development impairment. In the long term, nutritional problems increased the risk of disease and lower productivity. A method to overcome malnutrition was by using complementary feeding. This study aimed to create and evaluate the quality, safety and shelf life of instant porridge complementary feeding with the substitution of catfish flour and pumpkin flour. The method used in this study was an experimental study with two factorial completely randomized design with two repetitions to evaluate the product sensory. Furthermore, quality and safety testing was carried out according to the parameters set by Indonesia National Standard and Indonesia National Food and Drug Agency. In the final stage, the shelf life evaluation was carried out using the Extended Storage Studies (ESS) method using room temperature 27-37oC. The results showed that the use of catfish flour as much as 15% and pumpkin flour as much as 10% gave the best results on the sensory value of instant porridge. The product had a fairly good nutritional value, and safe in terms of heavy metals and microbiology. However, the water content of the product was still too high from the standard. The result of shelf life testing using the ESS method, instant porridge products had shelf life of 6 months at room temperature 27-37°C. The implications of this research can be used as a reference in the development of complementary feeding made from local food. 
Pengaruh penambahan rumput laut terhadap kandungan serat dan mutu sensorik snack tradisional serabi Irma Eva Yani; Nur Ahmad Habibi Habibi; Rizka Yulia Sary; Sri Darningsih

Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu dan Teknologi Pangan, Universitas Yudharta, Pasuruan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35891/tp.v14i1.3448

Abstract

???????????????????????? ???????? ???? ???????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????? ????????????????????????????????????. ???????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????? ???????? ???? ???????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????. ???????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????? ????????????????????????????. ???????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????? ???? ????????????-???????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????????????? (5.0%; 5.5%; ???????????? 6.0%). ???????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????? ????0, ????1, ????2 ???????????? ????4. ???????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????? ???????? ???? ???????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????? ????????????????????????, ???????????????????????? 1: ???????????????????????????? ???????????????? ????????????????, 2: ????????????????????????????, 3: ????????????????, ???????????? 4: ???????????????? ???????????????? ????????????????. ???????????????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????. ???????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????? ???????????????? ???? ???????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????????????? ???????? ????????????????????, ???????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????? (????-???????????????????? > 0.05) ???????? ???????????????????????????? ????????????????????????????. ????????????????????????????, ???????????????????? ???????? ???? ???????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????? ????????????????????????????. ???????????? ????4 ????????????????????, ???????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????? 6% ????????????????????????????, ???????????? ???????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????? ????????????????????????. ???????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????? ????4 ???????? 5.32%; ???????????????? ???????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????? ????1 ????????????????????, ???????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????????? ???? ???????????????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????? 3.85%. ???????? ???????? ???????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????? ???????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????????????????? ???? ???????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????? ????????????????????????????. ???????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????????? ???? ???????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????.
Co-Authors ., Ismanilda Clara Meliyanti Kusharto Dadan Rohdiana Irma Eva Yani Nur Ahmad Habibi Nurman, Zurni Rizka Yulia Sary Sri Anna Marliyati