Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Penegakan dan Pengaturan Hukum Kejahatan Dunia Maya (Cyebercrime) di Indonesia Elok Harry Ari Dhani Putri; Ramdhan Kasim; Leni Dwi Nurmala
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syariah Nurul Qarnain Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/aladalah.v2i3.865

Abstract

The aim of this research is to find out and analyze cybercrime law enforcement in Indonesia. The implementation of this research is normative research. Data analysis is an activity in research in the form of conducting studies or reviewing the results of data processing which is assisted by previously obtained theories. Cyber crime law enforcement in Indonesia can be carried out penal and non-penal. In general, seen from criminal policy (crime prevention policy), criminal law is not a strategic policy tool to prevent and eliminate causal factors or conditions that give rise to crime. We can see the positive criminal law provisions that are criminalized regarding cyber crime in Law Number 19 of 2016, amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions. Meanwhile, non-penal measures are carried out through social methods or approaches such as information, appeals, educational channels, coaching, and also related matters of preventing cyber crime. In realizing law enforcement, law enforcement officers need an active role, namely by being equipped with special skills in handling cyber crime.
Efektivitas Pengamanan Intelijen Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia dalam Eksekusi Obyek Sengketa Studi di Wilayah Hukum Polsek Batahan Polres Mandailing Natal Polda Sumatera Utara Helmi Jufri; Arifin Tumuhulawa; Ramdhan Kasim
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Juni : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v1i2.271

Abstract

This article aims to determine and analyze the effectiveness of the security of the Indonesian National Police Intelligence in the execution of disputed objects. Study in the Legal Area of the Batahan Police, Mandailing Natal Police (Madina), North Sumatra Police and to determine and analyze the factors that influence the security of police intelligence at the Batahan Police, Polda. North Sumatra regarding the execution of disputed objects. This type of research uses a Sociological Juridical Approach, namely a sociological juridical approach which is based on applicable statutory provisions linked to legal theory and looks at the reality that occurs in society by studying the law and reality in the field. The effectiveness of security at the Mandailing Natal (Madina) Police Department of North Sumatra Police regarding the execution process for disputed objects in North Sumatra Province based on Perkap BIN No. 2 of 2013. The implementation of security carried out by police personnel regarding the land dispute execution process based on obtaining data from all indicators based on security aspects of the North Sumatra Regional Police's Ditintelkam and Banlahan Police showed less effective results. On the other hand, the police have a role as law enforcers, so they must try to mediate in every conflict that occurs in society, especially in efforts to handle land execution cases. In an effort to increase the effectiveness of the police in securing land executions, they must adhere firmly to the law so as not to violate the role and function of the police, namely as protectors of the community, sometimes they are negligent and violate provisions.
Perlindungan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Notaris sebagai Pejabat Umum dalam Menjalankan Kewenangan Membuat Akta Otentik Asfariyani A. Talango; Nurwita Ismail; Ramdhan Kasim
Terang : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni : Terang : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/terang.v2i2.942

Abstract

Notaris sebagai pejabat publik memiliki wewenang membuat akta otentik sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 yang mengubah UU Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris. Akta otentik tersebut memiliki kekuatan pembuktian sempurna. Dalam menjalankan tugasnya, notaris kerap menghadapi masalah hukum, termasuk terlibat dalam perkara pidana sebagai saksi maupun tersangka. Oleh karena itu, perlindungan hukum terhadap notaris sebagai pejabat publik yang menjalankan tugas berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan sangat diperlukan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bentuk perlindungan hukum pidana yang dapat diberikan kepada notaris dalam menjalankan kewenangannya serta memahami prosedur penggunaan hak tolak (recht van weigering) dalam proses hukum pidana. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan normatif dengan studi kepustakaan terhadap regulasi terkait seperti UU Notaris dan KUHAP. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perlindungan hukum pidana terhadap notaris dapat dilakukan melalui mekanisme sesuai peraturan yang berlaku. Perlindungan ini terbagi dalam tiga aspek utama, yakni perlindungan preventif, represif, dan rehabilitatif. Selain itu, hak tolak merupakan instrumen penting yang melekat pada posisi notaris sebagai bentuk perlindungan terhadap kerahasiaan jabatan. Penggunaan hak tolak dalam proses pidana harus melalui prosedur tertentu yang melibatkan Dewan Kehormatan Notaris sesuai dengan Pasal 66 UU Notaris dan aturan pelaksanaannya. Dengan adanya perlindungan hukum yang jelas serta prosedur penggunaan hak tolak yang tepat, notaris diharapkan dapat menjalankan tugasnya dengan aman, profesional, serta menjaga integritas dan kerahasiaan dalam pelayanan hukum kepada masyarakat.
Can Crowdsourcing Revolutionize Constitutional Amendments in Indonesia? A Comparative Study of International Experiences Nggilu, Novendri; Ramdhan Kasim; Evi Noviawati; Andi Inar Sahabat; Tampubolon, Muhammad Hatta Roma
Indonesian State Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Indonesian State Law Review, April 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/islrev.v8i1.20618

Abstract

In the context of improving political systems and democracy, public participation in constitutional amendments has become increasingly important, but is often limited by existing mechanisms. In response to these limitations, Iceland and Estonia have implemented crowdsourcing models to engage the public in their constitutional amendment processes. This research aims to analyze the successes, challenges and potential of crowdsourcing in constitutional amendment, with a comparison between Iceland and Estonia, and its relevance for Indonesia. The findings show that while crowdsourcing has been successful in increasing public participation and transparency, significant challenges related to inequality in access to technology and the quality of public input remain. The novelty of this research lies in identifying the factors that influence the effectiveness of crowdsourcing in constitutional reform, as well as proposing an adaptation model for Indonesia that takes into account its social diversity and existing digital infrastructure. The research suggests that for the successful implementation of crowdsourcing in Indonesia's constitutional amendment, efforts are needed to create a more inclusive system and address existing digital inequalities.
Efektivitas terhadap Sanksi Pidana Bagi Perusahaan yang Menunggak Iuran Jaminan Sosial Ketenagakerjaan: Studi di BPJS Ketenagakerjaan Gorontalo Wahyu Nurhardiyanto Hulopi; Ramdhan Kasim; Roby W. Amu
Majelis: Jurnal Hukum Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Mei : Majelis : Jurnal Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/majelis.v2i2.648

Abstract

Law enforcement against criminal acts of companies that do not pay and deposit BPJS contributions based on the Social Security Organizing Agency Law. To determine and analyze the factors that influence the enforcement of criminal acts against companies that do not pay and deposit contributions to the Social Security Organizing Agency. Where this research method is normative juridical and empirical juridical. Normative juridical research is conducted by examining library materials or secondary materials only. This research is also carried out by describing, examining and explaining and analyzing normative provisions associated with the research nisi. While empirical research is based on the reality that researchers get in the field. From the results of this study it is known that the application of criminal sanctions against companies that are in arrears of employment social security contributions in Gorontalo Province has not shown optimal effectiveness or in other words less effective, this is based on the findings showing that the application of criminal sanctions against violations of participation in the employment social security program has not been effective, because 64.48% of workers have not received the protection of the program. Factors that influence companies that do not pay and deposit contributions to the Social Security Organizing Agency, namely: Economic and Financial Factors of the Company, Level of Knowledge and Compliance, Perception of Benefits and Risks, Access and Ease of Payment, Law Enforcement and Sanctions, Social and Cultural Factors.
Implikasi Hukum Terhadap Penetapan Tersangka Kembali Setelah Dibatalkan Oleh Putusan Praperadilan Momy Tahir; Ramdhan Kasim; Robby W. Amu
JURNAL PENDIDIKAN DAN ILMU SOSIAL (JUPENDIS) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2023): JULI : JURNAL PENDIDIKAN DAN ILMU SOSIAL
Publisher : Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis (ITB) Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (694.151 KB) | DOI: 10.54066/jupendis-itb.v1i3.229

Abstract

This study aims to find out about . What are the legal provisions for determining suspects as pretrial objects in criminal law and b What are the legal implications for re-determination of suspects after being canceled by a pretrial decision. The data collection method in this study was carried out by literature study, which is a way of collecting data by searching and studying library materials (literature, research results, scientific magazines, scientific bulletins, scientific journals, etc.). Legal materials are collected through inventory procedures and identification of laws and regulations, as well as classification and systematization of legal materials according to research problems. Therefore, the data collection technique used in this study was a literature study. The results of the study show that pretrial is a new thing in the life of law enforcement in Indonesia, has a goal to be upheld and protected, namely protecting the rights of suspects at the level of investigation and prosecution or preventing the arbitrariness of law enforcement officials against someone who is undergoing a legal process and To guarantee the protection of human rights and for law enforcers to carry out their duties consistently, the Criminal Procedure Code establishes a new institution called pretrial. Seeing the contents of the decision as referred to in Article 82 paragraph (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, that there are 3 (three) types of implementation of pretrial decisions: committing certain acts, paying an amount of money and providing rehabilitation. The legal basis for pretrial authority in deciding the suspect's determination is found in the Constitutional Court (MK) decision No. 21/PUU-XII/2014 which states that the determination of the status of a suspect is included in the object of pretrial and also in its ruling that Article 77 of the Criminal Procedure Code is contrary to the 1945 Constitution and does not have binding legal force as long as the pretrial is not interpreted including determination of suspects, searches , and confiscation. Meanwhile, the background to the addition of pretrial authority in deciding the determination of the suspect is that the determination of the suspect's status is the end result of the investigation activities carried out which are none other than the object of pretrial. Criminal acts after the status of the determination of the suspect is declared invalid in the pretrial decision are basically still valid. Examination in pretrial cases is only in the administrative area of ​​the investigative process. Often the Pretrial decision which cancels the determination of the suspect by the investigator, is based.