Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.116
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Aladalah: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik Konsensus: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Sigit Kamseno
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
Jurnal Hukum Makna Asas Legalitas Sebagai Pengakuan Terhadap Hukum Pidana Adat dan Penerimaan Norma-Norma Hukum Tradisonal Sigit Kamseno
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syariah Nurul Qarnain Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/aladalah.v1i2.1060

Abstract

Standard criminal regulation is a general set of laws that develops and creates among native networks with rules that are unique in relation to general criminal regulation. One of the rules that is the fundamental premise in standard criminal regulation is the guideline of lawfulness.This standard underscores the significance of having areasonable legitimate premise in deciding aq go about as a crook act and in monumental lawbreakers sanctions.
Analisis Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Pidana di Indonesia dengan Malaysia terhadap Kejahatan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sigit Kamseno
Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Januari : Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/amandemen.v1i1.518

Abstract

This research uses a normative juridical method by comparing criminal law arrangements related to corruption crimes enacted in two countries, namely Indonesia and Malaysia. This is motivated by the issue of corruption in both countries which is still a big problem, even though in terms of the Corruption Achievement Index (CPI), Malaysia is much better than Indonesia. From the results of the research, it is found that there are similarities and differences in the arrangements related to corruption crimes in the two countries. The similarities in both Indonesia and Malaysia are the implementation of the reverse proof system and the establishment of a special institution to eradicate corruption. While the difference is that Indonesia has more legal regulations, the existence of special courts for corruption crimes and the best evidentiary system is applied generally to every form of corruption crime. Meanwhile, Malaysia only has one legal regulation, does not have a special court for corruption and the reverse proof system applied is only limited to bribery cases. From these differences, it can be seen that in terms of the legal system and handling of corruption crimes, Indonesia is better than Malaysia.
Peran Penyidik dalam Menjamin Hak Tersangka : Kajian terhadap Implementasi KUHAP dalam Tahap Penyidikan Syarif Hidayatulloh; Sigit Kamseno
Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/demokrasi.v2i3.1218

Abstract

In a criminal justice system that upholds the principle of justice, the protection of suspects' rights is a crucial and fundamental component. Investigators play a crucial role in ensuring suspects' rights are protected during the investigation process, including the right to legal counsel, the right to access information, and the right to be free from arbitrary prosecution. The aim of this study is to explore the role of investigators in guaranteeing these rights and highlight challenges in their implementation. The study revealed that many suspects did not receive legal assistance from the beginning of the examination, lacked understanding of their rights, and faced investigations that often violated due process of law. This problem is exacerbated by limited human resources, inadequate internal oversight, and lack of ongoing training for investigators. These factors contribute to the failure to enforce the rights of suspects as a whole, which impacts the fairness and integrity of the legal process. In an effort to realize a fast, simple, and inexpensive judicial process, as promised in Law Number 48 of 2009, this study emphasizes the need for reforms to strengthen the investigation process. The reforms include improvements in the aspects of supervision and more in-depth training of investigators on human rights, so that they can better understand and implement the protection of the rights of suspects. In addition, the use of technology in investigations, such as digital-based information systems to manage evidence and legal processes, can increase transparency and accuracy in every stage of investigation. Strengthening internal supervision mechanisms is also very important to minimize abuse of authority by investigators. On the other hand, it is important to periodically evaluate the application of standard operating procedures (SOPs) in investigations, in order to ensure compliance with applicable laws and provide justice for suspects.
Perbandingan Hukum Pidana Tentang Kejahatan Kekerasan Seksual di Indonesia dan Singapura Sigit Kamseno; Agam Sakti Hidayat
Konsensus : Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Agustus : KONSENSUS : Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/konsensus.v1i4.334

Abstract

This study discusses the comparison of criminal law related to sexual violence in Indonesia and Singapore, focusing on the legal framework, definition and types of sexual violence, law enforcement process, and sanctions and punishments. In Indonesia, criminal law on sexual violence is regulated through Law No. 12 of 2022 concerning the Crime of Sexual Violence (UU TPKS) and the Criminal Code (KUHP), which covers various forms of sexual violence. Singapore uses the Penal Code and the Women's Charter as the legal basis, with additional protection for children through the Children and Young Persons Act (CYPA). This study found that Indonesia has a broader and more comprehensive definition of sexual violence than Singapore, which tends to be more specific. The law enforcement process in both countries involves reporting, investigation by the police, and the courts, but Singapore has a special unit that handles sexual crimes with a more focused focus. Sanctions and punishments in Singapore tend to be heavier, including caning, while in Indonesia, punishments vary depending on the type of sexual violence. The research method applied in this study is the normative legal method, which focuses on the analysis of laws and regulations, legal documents, and legal concepts relevant to a legal problem. The approach used is a conceptual approach, which prioritizes analysis from a problem-solving perspective. This approach involves understanding the legal concepts that underlie or form the background of the problem, as well as considering the values ​​contained in the normative of a regulation related to these concepts.
Peran Kepala Desa Teluk Terate Dalam Penyelesaian Perselisihan Sengketa Tanah : Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Desa Jo Peraturan Menteri Agraria Dan Tata Ruang/ Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 21 Tahun 2020 Tentang Penanganan Dan Penyelesaian Kasus Pertanahan Yuyun; Saifun Nufus; Sigit Kamseno
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 3 No 6 (2025): 2025
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v3i6.2553

Abstract

Sengketa tanah masih menjadi persoalan hukum dominan di tingkat desa karena berkaitan dengan kepemilikan, batas wilayah, dan lemahnya administrasi pertanahan sehingga kepala desa dituntut berperan sebagai mediator untuk menjaga keadilan sosial dan harmoni masyarakat. penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis peran kepala Desa Teluk Terate dalam penyelesaian sengketa tanah berdasarkan kewenangan hukum dan praktik sosial yang berkembang. penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis empiris dengan mengintegrasikan analisis hukum normatif dan observasi lapangan melalui wawancara langsung dengan kepala desa dan perangkat desa; hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kepala desa berperan sebagai mediator, fasilitator, dan penengah melalui klarifikasi administrasi, musyawarah, dan pemberian rekomendasi penyelesaian, meskipun efektivitasnya masih dibatasi oleh minimnya arsip pertanahan dan keterbatasan kewenangan yuridis; implikasinya menegaskan pentingnya penguatan kapasitas hukum pemerintahan desa, digitalisasi arsip pertanahan, serta koordinasi intensif dengan ATR/BPN untuk meningkatkan kepastian hukum dan efektivitas penyelesaian sengketa tanah di tingkat lokal
Disparitas Pemidanaan dalam Penegakan Pasal 127 Ayat (1) UU Narkotika: Studi Kasus Dua Putusan PN Serang Iyang Yanuar; Sigit Kamseno; Muhamad Yusar
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 3 No 6 (2025): 2025
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v3i6.2693

Abstract

Indonesia sebagai negara dengan sistem hukum civil law menjadikan asas legalitas sebagai fondasi utama dalam pemidanaan. Namun, dalam praktiknya, terjadi ketimpangan antara norma ideal (das sollen) dan kenyataan hukum (das sein), terutama dalam kasus penyalahgunaan narkotika. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis praktik pemidanaan terhadap pelaku penyalahgunaan narkotika dan mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor yang menyebabkan disparitas putusan hakim, dengan fokus pada dua putusan berbeda dari majelis hakim yang sama. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan kasus dan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa disparitas pemidanaan dipengaruhi oleh diskresi hakim, ketidaksesuaian antara SEMA No. 4 Tahun 2010 dan regulasi teknis seperti Permenkes No. 7 Tahun 2025, serta kurangnya sinkronisasi dengan Undang-Undang Narkotika sebagai norma hukum yang lebih tinggi. Ketidakharmonisan ini menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum dan mengancam prinsip kesetaraan di hadapan hukum serta keadilan substantif. Reformulasi pedoman yudisial diperlukan untuk menjamin hak rehabilitasi dan perlindungan HAM bagi korban penyalahgunaan narkotika.
Co-Authors Agam Sakti Hidayat Iyang Yanuar Muhamad Yusar Saifun Nufus Syarif Hidayatulloh Yuyun