Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.778
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Dinamika Hukum Syiar Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum jurnal hukum das sollen Constitution Journal
Rifa'i, Iman Jalaludin
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
KOMPARASI KONSTITUSI NEGARA PORTUGAL DENGAN NEGARA UZBEKISTAN BERDASARKAN SIFAT, PROSEDUR PERUBAHAN KONSTITUSI, BENTUK NEGARA SERTA SISTEM PEMERINTAHAN Rifa'i, Iman Jalaludin; Yuhandra, Erga; Budiman, Haris; Hidayat, Sarip
JURNAL HUKUM DAS SOLLEN Vol 10 No 1 (2024): Jurnal Hukum Das Sollen
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indragiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32520/das-sollen.v10i1.3318

Abstract

Konstitusi merupakan kumpulan asas-asas yang menyelenggarakan kekuasaan pemerintahan, hak-hak dari yang diperintah dan hubungan antara pemerintah dan yang diperintah). Secara umum konstitusi atau undang-undang dasar berisi 3 (tiga) hal pokok, yaitu: Pertama, adanya jaminan terhadap hak-hak asasi manusia dan warga negara; Kedua, ditetapkannya susunan ketatanegaraan yang bersifat fundamental; dan Ketiga, adanya pembagian dan pembatasan tugas ketatanegaraan yang juga bersifat fundamental. Metode penelitian dalam tulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif yaitu penelitian hukum kepustakaan yang dilakukan dengan cara meneliti bahan-bahan kepustakaan atau data sekunder belaka. Secara umum, terdapat beberapa perbedaan antara Konstitusi Negara Portugal dan Negara Uzbekistan dalam hal sifat, prosedur perubahan konstitusi, bentuk pemerintahan, bentuk negara, serta sistem pemerintahan. Kata Kunci : Perbandingan Konstitusi, Negara Portugal, Negara Uzbekistan
Legal Protection for Children Perpetrating the Crime of Theft Based on Restorative Justice Hidayat, Sarip; Adhyakhsa, Gios; Rifa'i, Iman Jalaludin; Hermansyah, Dadan
Syiar Hukum Volume 22, No 1 (2024) : Syiar Hukum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29313/shjih.v22i1.13521

Abstract

Arrangement opposite child with law as perpetrator follows criminal arranged in Constitution Number 12 of 2011 concerning System Justice Juvenile Crime which is umbrella law on protection against child with law until this moment, form and procedure implementation crime and Action against child arranged in Government Regulation Number 58 of 2022, This is a mandate from Article 71 paragraph (5) and Article 82 paragraph (4) of Constitution Number 12 of 2011 concerning the Child Crime Justice System. The research method used in this study is a normative juridical method with regulatory primary data applicable laws and secondary data books, reports, journals and interviews on parties related as primary data amplifier. Research results This is The goals of the juvenile justice system is For repairs behaviour child And give education as well as protection that the child needs , so the child when returning to environmental society can be accepted easily and can operate Again functions child, there is accompaniment law in the judicial process these and rights fulfillment child Already in accordance with applicable laws. Settlement process in a manner justice restorative and Diversion ie form mandatory solution attempted to oppose child with law Good as perpetrator following criminal, victim of criminal crime or witness following crime, then in the process of investigation party investigator must make an effort settlement in a manner restorative justice and Diversion, as well should be when prosecuted general as well as in mandatory Diversion courts attempted to child, in Diversion should be There is agreement between the parties for the resolution process in accordance with what is desired and obtain a sense of justice to child.
Pembatasan Kegiatan Keagamaan oleh Pemerintah Daerah: Konstitusionalitas dan Prinsip Negara Hukum: Restrictions on Religious Activities by Local Governments: A Study on Constitutionality and the Rule of Law Principle Rifa'i, Iman Jalaludin; Azizah, Naili
Constitution Journal Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Constitution Journal June 2025
Publisher : UIN Kiai Haji Ahmad Siddiq Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/constitution.v4i1.134

Abstract

Decentralization under Law Number 23 of 2014 grants broad authority to local governments in managing social and religious affairs. However, practices such as the prohibition of Ahmadiyya Jamaah’s Jalsah Salanah by certain regional governments raise tensions between freedom of religion and the rule of law. This study aims to evaluate the legality and legitimacy of such restrictions using John Rawls’ theory of justice, particularly the principles of basic liberties and the difference principle. A normative juridical method is employed, with statutory, case-based, and conceptual approaches. The findings reveal that many local regulations lack a national legal basis, fail the proportionality test, and discriminate against minority groups without social compensation, thereby conflicting with Rawlsian principles. The study concludes that Rawlsian justice principles must be integrated into local legislative processes, judicial review mechanisms strengthened, and inclusive deliberative forums implemented to ensure regional autonomy aligns with constitutional supremacy. Practically, this research offers an evaluative framework for local policymakers and serves as a normative reference for the Supreme Court and Constitutional Court in reviewing potentially discriminatory local regulations. Abstrak Desentralisasi melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 memberikan kewenangan luas kepada pemerintah daerah dalam urusan sosial dan keagamaan. Namun, praktik pembatasan ibadah oleh beberapa Pemda, seperti pelarangan Jalsah Salanah Jamaah Ahmadiyah, menimbulkan konflik antara kebebasan beragama dan prinsip negara hukum. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengevaluasi legalitas dan legitimasi pembatasan tersebut dengan teori keadilan John Rawls, khususnya prinsip kebebasan dasar dan difference principle. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, kasus, dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sejumlah kebijakan daerah tidak berlandaskan hukum nasional, tidak proporsional, serta merugikan kelompok minoritas secara diskriminatif. Kesimpulannya, diperlukan integrasi prinsip keadilan Rawlsian dalam legislasi daerah, penguatan judicial review, dan forum deliberatif yang inklusif agar otonomi daerah tidak melanggar supremasi konstitusi. Penelitian ini berkontribusi dalam menyediakan kerangka evaluatif bagi pemerintah daerah dan menjadi rujukan normatif bagi Mahkamah Agung dan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam menilai keabsahan peraturan daerah yang potensial melanggar kebebasan beragama.
EFEKTIVITAS YURISDIKSI MAHKAMAH INTERNASIONAL DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM HUMANITER TERKAIT KEJAHATAN PERANG DAN PEMINDAHAN PAKSA DI GAZA Rifa'i, Iman Jalaludin; Yuhandra, Erga; Fathurrahman, Fathur; Akbar, Satria
Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika Hukum Vol 26 No 2 (2025): Edisi Oktober 2025
Publisher : Universitas Stikubank

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35315/dh.v26i2.10407

Abstract

The effectiveness of the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in enforcing international humanitarian law related to war crimes and forced displacement in Gaza faces complex challenges. Although the ICJ has international legal authority to adjudicate violations of international obligations, the implementation of ICJ decisions, in particular provisional measures that have been issued regarding Gaza, are often ignored by Israel. This non-compliance is further complicated by global political factors, especially the United States' support for the temporary relocation policy of Gazans which exacerbates patterns of forced displacement. This research uses a normative juridical method, with a focus on studying international legal norms, such as the 1945 Statute of the International Court of Justice, the 1949 Geneva Convention IV, and the 1998 Rome Statute. A conceptual approach is used to dissect the concept of the effectiveness of the ICJ's jurisdiction, while a case approach is applied in analyzing the application of the ICJ's jurisdiction to the post-2023 Gaza conflict. political domination of big countries. Therefore, strengthening the ICJ's jurisdiction requires effective compliance system reform and firmer political support from the international community so that the ICJ does not simply become a normative symbol.
Co-Authors Adhyakhsa, Gios Akbar, Satria Erga Yuhandra Fathurrahman, Fathur Gios Adhyaksa Hermansyah, Dadan Naili Azizah Sarip Hidayat, Sarip