Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 17 Documents
Search

Implikasi Inkonsistensi Penafsiran Pasal 70 Huruf H ayat (1) KUHP dalam Merespon Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Calvin; Nasution, Rasina Padeni
Judex Laguens Vol 3 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.3.2.8.2025.289-308

Abstract

Kehadiran KUHP Nasional merupakan tonggak penting dalam pembaruan hukum pidana Indonesia, menggantikan warisan kolonial dengan paradigma baru. Namun, beberapa pasal dalam KUHP Nasional masih memiliki kecenderungan multitafsir, termasuk Pasal 70 Huruf H ayat (1), yang berpotensi menimbulkan inkonsistensi dalam penerapannya. Ketidakjelasan pasal ini dapat mengarah pada ketidakadilan bagi korban kejahatan, terutama dalam konteks victim precipitation. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan fokus pada analisis norma hukum dalam peraturan perundang-undangan, khususnya Pasal 70 Huruf H ayat (1) KUHP Nasional. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa ketidakjelasan pasal 70 huruf H ayat (1) akan memberikan implikasi yang inkonsistensi dalam penerapannya. Korban akan sering mendapatkan perlakuan yang cenderung tidak adil, hal itu disebabkan pelaku kejahatan berlindung di balik klaim bahwa tindakan mereka diprovokasi oleh korban, seperti dalam kasus kejahatan seksual yang dikaitkan dengan cara berpakaian korban. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini merekomendasikan penafsiran yang lebih komprehensif terhadap frasa "mendorong atau menggerakkan" dalam konteks victim precipitation, batasan yang jelas mengenai kejahatan yang dapat dikategorikan sebagai victim precipitation, proporsionalitas antara tindakan korban dan reaksi pelaku, kemudian intensitas dan kesengajaan provokasi korban. Selain itu, diperlukan pelatihan bagi aparat penegak hukum agar dapat menerapkan pasal ini secara adil dan tepat.
Analisis Hukum Pidana terhadap Praktik Jual-Beli Rekening Bank dalam Transaksi Judi Online di Indonesia Milen, Swity; Nasution, Rasina Padeni
Legalite : Jurnal Perundang Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam Vol 10 No 1 (2025): Legalite: Jurnal Perundang Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam
Publisher : IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/legalite.v10i1.10525

Abstract

The advancement of technology has triggered the emergence of various new crime modes, including online gambling, which utilizes bank accounts as a means of financial transactions. These accounts are often obtained through syndicates that purchase them from the public at high prices. This practice raises legal issues as there are no specific regulations governing the buying and selling of bank accounts for online gambling transactions. This study aims to analyze the legal framework for online gambling transactions in Indonesia, examine the criminal law perspective on the trade of bank accounts for such transactions, and assess the forms of criminal liability for the perpetrators. The research employs a normative juridical approach with conceptual and legislative analyses. The findings indicate that, to date, there are no specific regulations governing the trade of bank accounts or online gambling in Indonesia, despite both being illegal activities. Consequently, criminal liability for those involved in selling bank accounts cannot be firmly enforced due to the absence of clear legal provisions. Therefore, regulatory reforms are necessary to accommodate the evolving nature of technology-based crimes.
POLA BANTUAN HUKUM DALAM MENCEGAH TERJADINYA TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN SEKSUAL Nasution, Rasina Padeni
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 8 No. 3 (2024): September-Desember
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v8i3.9487

Abstract

The legal aid model is an effort to ensure that every citizen, especially those who are less fortunate, has access to justice. This study aims to describe the implementation of the legal aid models employed by legal aid institutions to prevent sexual violence crimes in the city of Medan. The research method used is empirical juridical research, which examines the law based on facts in society and considers the function of the law. The analysis technique employed is descriptive analysis. The results of the study show that the implementation of the structural legal aid model (BHS) by LBH Medan and the structural gender legal aid model (BHGS) by LBH APIK are effective models in providing legal protection by expanding access to justice for victims. These models focus on recovery and the enhancement of premium services based on an approach to justice that not only aims to resolve cases through legal channels but also strives to change unjust social structures due to power relations, aiming towards more equal social relations and a gender perspective. The conclusion of this study indicates that the implementation of BHS by LBH Medan and BHGS by LBH APIK plays a significant role in both preventive and repressive efforts to prevent and address sexual violence in the city of Medan. These models also serve as solutions in synergizing stakeholders in advocating for sexual violence cases in the city of Medan.
Penerapan Keadilan Restoratif dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga di Wilayah Hukum Polrestabes Medan Tahun 2022 - 2024 Fitri, Desi Ira Ari; Nasution, Rasina Padeni
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 9 No. 4 (2025): Legal Standing
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v9i4.12176

Abstract

Criminal case settlement can be done in two ways, namely litigation (through the trial process in court) and Non-litigation (outside the court). The non-litigating method is currently known as Restorative Justice. Restorative Justice can be applied in minor crimes including Domestic Violence (KDRT). In response to the large number of domestic violence cases reported in the jurisdiction of the Medan Police, Restorative Justice was applied as an effort to resolve the crime of domestic violence. Based on Perpol No. 8 of 2021, the police have a significant role in applying the principles of Restorative Justice in resolving domestic violence cases. This study aims to examine the application of Restorative Justice in the resolution of domestic violence crimes as well as the challenges and obstacles experienced by the Medan Police Department. The type of research used is empirical juridical research and uses a case approach. The data source in this study is the primary data source obtained from the field by interviewing the Medan Police Department, then the data analysis technique used is qualitative analysis. The result of this study is that the Medan Police apply the principle of restorative justice in resolving domestic violence cases by facilitating dialogue between the perpetrator and the victim in a professional, neutral manner and ensuring that the victim does not experience intimidation and feel pressured by ensuring that the victim can voice what he feels and what impact he experiences as a result of the violence committed by the perpetrator. The victim is compensated for the losses he has suffered. In implementing restorative justice, the Medan Police did not find any challenges, but there were obstacles experienced by the police, namely incitement from other parties such as family and others, thus hindering the implementation of restorative justice.
Sektor Pelayanan Publik Sebagai Sarana Korupsi di Kota Medan Nasution, Rasina Padeni; Batuabara, Indah Sakinah; Rahma, Annisa Aulia; Aila, Nurul; Amaliah, Rizky; Butarbutar, Rini Andriani
At-Tadris: Journal of Islamic Education Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): At-Tadris: Journal of Islamic Education
Publisher : Ikatan Dai Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56672/tk9bq967

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation is to ascertain the scope of the Ombudsman's function as a state institution with the authority to oversee the implementation of public services organized by state and government administrators. These public services include those held by State-Owned Enterprises, Regional-Owned Enterprises, and State-Owned Legal Entities, as well as private entities or individuals tasked with managing specific public services in the Medan City region.An interview and observation-based qualitative descriptive research approach was utilized in this study. "Key informants, main informants, and additional informants" were utilized in the study. This study's findings explain how the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia and the Kedan Ombudsman were able to set up a supervisory mechanism that was appropriate for its responsibilities. The partnership process that has been established between the Representative for North Sumatra of the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia and the Representative for North Sumatra of the Kedan Ombudsman demonstrates this. The goal of this partnership, which is to improve the quality of public services in the Medan City region, will remain a priority.  
Implementasi pendampingan hukum terhadap pelaku judi online oleh Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Medan Sipahuntar, Sah Vika Nur; Nasution, Rasina Padeni
Cessie : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): Cessie: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum (In progress)
Publisher : ARKA INSTITUTE

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55904/cessie.v4i4.1856

Abstract

Meningkatnya kasus judi online di Indonesia tidak hanya menimbulkan kekhawatiran sosial, tetapi juga menghadirkan tantangan hukum baru dalam menjamin prinsip due process of law, khususnya dalam perlindungan hak-hak tersangka. Lembaga Bantuan Hukum (LBH) Medan sebagai bagian dari masyarakat sipil memiliki peran strategis dalam memberikan pendampingan hukum kepada pelaku judi online, terutama mereka yang berasal dari kelompok rentan dan berpenghasilan rendah. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis empiris dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui wawancara, studi dokumentasi, dan kajian literatur. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa LBH Medan memberikan pendampingan hukum sejak tahap penyelidikan, penuntutan, hingga persidangan, guna menjamin hak-hak tersangka seperti hak untuk membela diri, hak untuk tidak disiksa, dan hak atas perlakuan yang adil dalam proses peradilan pidana. Namun, dalam implementasinya masih ditemukan beberapa kendala, seperti keterbatasan jumlah advokat pro bono, minimnya pemahaman hukum dari pelaku, serta resistensi aparat penegak hukum terhadap keberadaan penasihat hukum. Berdasarkan temuan tersebut, penelitian ini merekomendasikan penguatan kapasitas kelembagaan LBH Medan, peningkatan litera si hukum bagi masyarakat, serta optimalisasi koordinasi antara LBH dan aparat penegak hukum guna memastikan perlindungan hak asasi setiap individu dalam perkara pidana, termasuk pelaku judi online.  
DISPARITAS PEMIDANAAN PUTUSAN HAKIM PADA KASUS TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN DENGAN PEMBERATAN (STUDI PUTUSAN 120/pid.B/2021/PN.Gst dan 144/pid.B/2021/PN.Gst) Putri, Icha Yuliani; Zulkarnain, Zulkarnain; Nasution, Rasina Padeni
SUPREMASI: Jurnal Pemikiran, Penelitian Ilmu-ilmu Sosial, Hukum dan Pengajarannya Volume 20, Nomor 2 (Oktober 2025)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26858/supremasi.v20i2.76976

Abstract

Penegakan hukum pidana idealnya harus mencerminkan prinsip keadilan, kepastian hukum, dan kemanfaatan. Namun, faktanya sering terjadi perbedaan dalam pemberian hukuman, yaitu perbedaan hukuman terhadap tindak pidana yang memiliki unsur dan keadaan yang relatif sama. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis disparitas pemidanaan dalam kasus tindak pidana pencurian dengan pemberatan, melalui studi terhadap Putusan Nomor 120/Pid.B/2021/PN.Gst dan Putusan Nomor 144/Pid.B/2021/PN.Gst. Penelitian ini menerapkan metode yuridis normatif dengan studi kasus, dan hasilnya menunjukkan adanya perbedaan signifikan dalam putusan pidana hakim, yaitu 5 bulan penjara dalam Putusan 120/Pid.B/2021/PN.Gst dan 1 tahun 6 bulan penjara dalam Putusan 144/Pid.B/2021/PN.Gst. Disparitas ini dipengaruhi oleh faktor-faktor yuridis seperti pembuktian unsur delik dan keadaan memberatkan atau meringankan, serta faktor non-yuridis seperti latar belakang terdakwa, kerugian korban, dan pertimbangan moral hakim. Temuan ini menegaskan pentingnya pedoman pemidanaan sebagai instrumen untuk mencegah disparitas yang berlebihan dan memastikan keadilan substantif dalam setiap putusan pengadilan.