Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Penggunaan Laboratorium Virtual dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Sahara, Ani; Sholehah, Azmiatun; Febriani, Putri Ayu; Syaharuddin; Mandailina, Vera; Hermansyah, David
Jurnal Riset Teknologi dan Inovasi Pendidikan (Jartika) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): Juni
Publisher : Jurnal Riset Teknologi dan Inovasi Pendidikan (Jartika)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36765/jartika.v6i2.680

Abstract

Abstrak: Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk melakukan analisis yang lebih mendalam terhadap peran laboratorium virtual dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa. Data yang digunakan terdiri dari 46 artikel penelitian yang diterbitkan dalam kurun waktu 5 tahun terakhir. Analisis dilakukan menggunakan metode meta-analisis dengan memanfaatkan nilai effect size (ES) dan standard error (SE), dan hasilnya diolah melalui perangkat lunak JASP untuk mendapatkan nilai summary effect. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa laboratorium virtual memiliki dampak positif signifikan dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa, dengan nilai rata-rata sebesar 76% atau 0.76, yang masuk dalam kategori efek tinggi. Lebih lanjut, analisis berdasarkan jenjang pendidikan mengindikasikan bahwa dampak positif ini berbeda-beda, yakni sebesar 74% di tingkat Perguruan Tinggi, 79% di tingkat SMA, dan 71% di tingkat SMP. Terdapat peningkatan nilai yang lebih signifikan pada tingkat SMA, menunjukkan bahwa implementasi laboratorium virtual seharusnya lebih difokuskan di tingkat tersebut di masa mendatang. Abstract: The purpose of this study is to analyze more deeply about virtual laboratories in improving students' creative thinking skills. The data obtained were 46 articles from previous research published in the last 5 years, then analyzed using meta-analysis through the effect size (ES) value and standard error (SE) to see the summary effect value using JASP software. The results show that virtual laboratories can improve students' creative thinking skills with an average value of 76% or 0.76 with a high effect category. Furthermore, the results of the analysis based on the level of education show that the university level has an effect of 74%, high school level of 79%, and junior high school of 71%. The greater value at the high school level, so that in the future, virtual laboratories are highly emphasized to be implemented at the high school level.
The Impact of Lecture Involvement in the Mathematics Learning Process on Student Satisfaction Aini, Kuratul; Mahsup, Mahsup; Mandailina, Vera; Febriani, Putri Ayu; Syaharuddin, Syaharuddin
JPMI (Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia) Vol 9, No 1 (2024): Volume 9 Number 1, March 2024
Publisher : STKIP Singkawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26737/jpmi.v9i1.5302

Abstract

The main focus of this study revolves around the dimension of faculty involvement, encompassing direct interaction, support, and guidance within the context of mathematics instruction, vis-à-vis student satisfaction. This research adopts a quantitative approach employing a survey methodology aimed at exploring the impact of faculty involvement in the mathematics leraning process on student satisfaction levels. The respondents consist of 13 male and 31 female students. The research instrument utilized is a questionnaire comprising 10 questions, employing a Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree (score 1) to strongly agree (score 5). Indicators within the questionnaire cover various aspects such as the clarity of instructional materials, information related to recent developments in the field of mathematics, and support in overcoming learning difficulties. Data analysis for this research utilizes descriptive statistics and the student's t-test with the assistance of the JASP software. The criterion for drawing conclusions is if the Sig value < 0.05, then H0 is rejected, indicating a significant influence of lecturer involvement on student satisfaction. The results of the hypothesis test using the paired sample T-Test show a t-test value of 0.106 with a p-value of 0.917. The interpretation of the hypothesis test results supports the null hypothesis (H0), stating the absence of differences in the perceptions of male and female students regarding lecturer involvement in teaching mathematics and its impact on student satisfaction. With a high p-value of 0.917, indicating homogeneity in perceptions, further research is recommended to explore factors that may influence students' perceptions of lecturer involvement. The conclusion of this study is expected to provide in-depth insights into the relationship between lecturer involvement and student satisfaction, laying the groundwork for efforts to enhance the quality of mathematics education at the university level.
The effect of group investigation model of learning on improving mathematics learning outcomes Aini, Kuratul; Mahsup, Mahsup; Mandailina, Vera; Abdillah, Abdillah; Febriani, Putri Ayu
UNION : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Vol 12 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30738/union.v12i2.17515

Abstract

The instructional model is a crucial component in the educational process. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the Group Investigation learning model in enhancing students' mathematics outcomes. A quantitative research method with a One Group Pretest-Posttest design was used, involving 29 eighth-grade students. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25, revealing a pretest score of 0.010 and a posttest score of 0.063 after implementing the Group Investigation model. The average posttest score was 77.91, indicating a significant impact on learning outcomes. Observations over three sessions showed an increase in student participation from 26.97% with an average score of 2.24 in Session I (categorized as "Less Active") to 42.79% with an average score of 3.56 in Session II, and 45.38% with an average score of 3.78 in Session III (both categorized as "Active"). This increase demonstrates that the Group Investigation model not only enhances student participation but also makes students more active in learning, thereby improving mathematics outcomes. Therefore, the Group Investigation model is an effective strategy for enhancing students' achievement in mathematics. Further research with more refined methods and tools is needed to confirm these findings.