Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unnes Law Journal JPNM : Jurnal Pustaka Nusantara Multidisiplin
Ansyari, Azmi
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analyzing Subjective Defects in a Civil Tortious Lawsuit: Inconsistencies between Posita and Petitum in the Control Assumption of the Testator’s Estate (Case No. 415/Pdt.G/2022/PN.Jkt.Brt) Ansyari, Azmi; Hafiz, Syahwir; Harahap, Shabrina; Sufiarina, Sufiarina
Unnes Law Journal Vol 9 No 2 (2023): Contemporary Issues on Law and Development: Social, Political and Legal Aspects
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v9i2.75576

Abstract

Referring to a civil case number 415/Pdt.G/2022/PN.Jkt.Brt, the plaintiffs who are the testator’s wife and daughter file a Tortious lawsuit against the defendant for an unlawful act. The plaintiffs describe the unlawful act as taking control of the estate by the testator sibling who has a mutual agreement between the defendant and the testator’s wife. This has happened prior to the distribution of the estate among the rightful heirs. The panel of judges who have reviewed the case in question, give a verdict of ‘an inadmissible lawsuit claim.’ The point of interest that the writers want to bring up and research on is the reason behind judges’ verdict that has made the case as a “niet onvankelijke verklaard'' case. To elaborate further, doctrinal research is done on the principles of civil procedural law, especially the relationship between the type of civil litigation with its legal arguments (‘posita’) and the legal claims (‘petitum’). The research results show that there are major inconsistencies between the type of civil litigation that has been filed with the content of ‘posita’ and ‘petitium.’ The plaintiffs file a tortious lawsuit at the district court while their ‘posita’ are mixing between undistributed testator’s estate and the defendant’s action of taking over the estate that is based on an agreement. Besides that, the legal claims have a few mix-ups, including demanding to state a tortious act by the defendant, petitioning the court to invalidate the mutual agreement, and seeking the court’s determination of heirs. In a tortious lawsuit, the plaintiffs shall seek compensation for their losses. As an advocate, it is expected to have an awareness in preparing a good and proper legal argument and claims in a civil lawsuit. These inconsistencies yield an inadmissible lawsuit; hence the plaintiff’s legal interests cannot be served through civil legal proceedings.
Analisis Hukum Terhadap Insider Trading dalam Sistem Hukum Pasar Modal di Indonesia Ansyari, Azmi; Martien, Dhoni
JPNM Jurnal Pustaka Nusantara Multidisiplin Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): October : Jurnal Pustaka Nusantara Multidisiplin
Publisher : SM Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59945/jpnm.v3i3.623

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji regulasi hukum serta efektivitas penegakan terhadap praktik insider trading dalam konteks hukum pasar modal di Indonesia. Insider trading merupakan bentuk pelanggaran yang terjadi ketika seseorang memanfaatkan informasi material yang belum tersedia untuk publik dalam melakukan transaksi efek, sehingga melanggar asas keadilan dan keterbukaan. Di Indonesia, praktik ini telah diatur melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1995 tentang Pasar Modal, namun implementasinya masih menghadapi berbagai kendala, seperti lemahnya sistem pengawasan, kesulitan dalam proses pembuktian, serta sanksi yang belum menimbulkan efek jera. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan dan studi perbandingan dengan sistem hukum di Singapura. Hasil penelitian mengindikasikan bahwa sistem hukum di Indonesia masih memerlukan penguatan, baik dari segi regulasi maupun mekanisme pengawasan dan penegakannya. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan pembaruan regulasi, peningkatan kapasitas institusi pengawas, serta adopsi praktik-praktik terbaik dari negara yang memiliki sistem hukum lebih maju.
Co-Authors Hafiz, Syahwir Harahap, Shabrina Martien, Dhoni Sufiarina