Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unnes Law Journal JPNM : Jurnal Pustaka Nusantara Multidisiplin
Hafiz, Syahwir
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analyzing Subjective Defects in a Civil Tortious Lawsuit: Inconsistencies between Posita and Petitum in the Control Assumption of the Testator’s Estate (Case No. 415/Pdt.G/2022/PN.Jkt.Brt) Ansyari, Azmi; Hafiz, Syahwir; Harahap, Shabrina; Sufiarina, Sufiarina
Unnes Law Journal Vol 9 No 2 (2023): Contemporary Issues on Law and Development: Social, Political and Legal Aspects
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v9i2.75576

Abstract

Referring to a civil case number 415/Pdt.G/2022/PN.Jkt.Brt, the plaintiffs who are the testator’s wife and daughter file a Tortious lawsuit against the defendant for an unlawful act. The plaintiffs describe the unlawful act as taking control of the estate by the testator sibling who has a mutual agreement between the defendant and the testator’s wife. This has happened prior to the distribution of the estate among the rightful heirs. The panel of judges who have reviewed the case in question, give a verdict of ‘an inadmissible lawsuit claim.’ The point of interest that the writers want to bring up and research on is the reason behind judges’ verdict that has made the case as a “niet onvankelijke verklaard'' case. To elaborate further, doctrinal research is done on the principles of civil procedural law, especially the relationship between the type of civil litigation with its legal arguments (‘posita’) and the legal claims (‘petitum’). The research results show that there are major inconsistencies between the type of civil litigation that has been filed with the content of ‘posita’ and ‘petitium.’ The plaintiffs file a tortious lawsuit at the district court while their ‘posita’ are mixing between undistributed testator’s estate and the defendant’s action of taking over the estate that is based on an agreement. Besides that, the legal claims have a few mix-ups, including demanding to state a tortious act by the defendant, petitioning the court to invalidate the mutual agreement, and seeking the court’s determination of heirs. In a tortious lawsuit, the plaintiffs shall seek compensation for their losses. As an advocate, it is expected to have an awareness in preparing a good and proper legal argument and claims in a civil lawsuit. These inconsistencies yield an inadmissible lawsuit; hence the plaintiff’s legal interests cannot be served through civil legal proceedings.
Pengaruh Kebijakan Omnibus Law terhadap Regulasi Pasar Modal dan Investasi di Indonesia Hafiz, Syahwir; Martien, Dhoni
JPNM Jurnal Pustaka Nusantara Multidisiplin Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): October : Jurnal Pustaka Nusantara Multidisiplin
Publisher : SM Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59945/jpnm.v3i3.622

Abstract

Omnibus Law merupakan suatu cara legislatif yang bertujuan untuk merampingkan dan mereformasi sejumlah peraturan perundang-undangan demi menciptakan lingkungan investasi yang lebih baik di Indonesia. Salah satu hasil utama dari pendekatan ini adalah Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi dampak kebijakan Omnibus Law terhadap regulasi pasar modal dan investasi di Indonesia, baik dari segi substansi hukum maupun implikasi dalam praktiknya. Metode yang digunakan dalam studi ini adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan analisis perundang-undangan dan kajian literatur. Temuan dari penelitian mengindikasikan bahwa Omnibus Law membawa perubahan signifikan dalam berbagai aspek regulasi, termasuk kemudahan dalam berbisnis, pengurangan hambatan birokrasi, dan peningkatan peran lembaga pengawas seperti Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK). Dalam sektor pasar modal, terdapat penyederhanaan prosedur untuk emisi saham dan izin usaha. Meskipun demikian, pelaksanaan kebijakan ini juga menghadapi kritik, terutama terkait kemungkinan lemahnya perlindungan hukum bagi investor dan risiko ketidakpastian hukum akibat proses legislasi yang tergesa-gesa. Oleh karena itu, evaluasi serta penguatan regulasi turunan sangat diperlukan agar reformasi hukum melalui Omnibus Law benar-benar mampu mendukung perkembangan pasar modal dan investasi secara berkelanjutan.
Co-Authors Ansyari, Azmi Harahap, Shabrina Martien, Dhoni Sufiarina