Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.92
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Ahwal Syakhshiyyah (JAS) Supremasi Hukum Syaksia : Jurnal Hukum Perdata Islam Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains USRAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam
Elfia
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
PERAN HAKIM MENERAPKAN KEADILAN: STUDI KASUS PENGGUGAT KLAIM BEBERAPA ASET PADA PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA HARTA BERSAMA Muddin, Ilhammuddin; Elfia; Zulfan
SUPREMASI HUKUM Vol. 20 No. 02 (2024): Supremasi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Syekh Yusuf

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study reviews court decisions in resolving joint property disputes, focusing on analyzing the decision in case number 0000/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Kds. The division of inherited property is a complicated problem because it often causes conflict among heirs. This research is library reasearch by examining phenomena that occur in society, using secondary data sources in the form of relevant literature studies, followed by qualitative descriptive analysis. The results showed that the decision in the settlement of joint property disputes was based on Article 35 paragraph (1) of Law Number 1 of 1974 and the Compilation of Islamic Law, which emphasized that property obtained during marriage becomes joint property. The plaintiff's claim to several assets as joint property was partially recognized by the defendant after careful examination. Keywords: Asset, Judge, Justice, Dispute Resolution
PEMBERIAN WASIAT WAJIBAH KEPADA ISTERI NON-MUSLIM (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 16 K/AG/2010) Nur Fazila; Muchlis bahar; elfia
Syakhsia Jurnal Hukum Perdata Islam Vol 25 No 1 (2024): Januari-Juni
Publisher : Islamic Civil Law Departement of Shari'a Faculty at Islamic State University of Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37035/syaksia.v25i1.9957

Abstract

A mandatory will is a gift of inheritance given to heirs who do not get a share of the inheritance left by the heir. Usually those who get a share of the inheritance are adopted children or adoptive parents, but in jurisprudence Number 16K/AG/2010 wives who are non-religious Muslims by the supreme court receive a share of the inheritance in the form of a mandatory will. This type of research is normative legal research, namely legal research carried out by examining library materials or secondary data. This research is descriptive analysis with the method used in this research, namely normative juridical. The data source is primary legal material originating from Supreme Court decision Number 16 K/AG/2010, and secondary legal material comes from books, journals and articles related to this research topic RI Supreme Court Decision No.16 K/AG/2010 , the Supreme Court of Justice is of the opinion that the Decision of the Makasar High Religious Court Number 59/Pdt.G/2009 which upholds the decision of the Makasar Religious Court Number 732/Pdt.G/2008 is cancelled. Furthermore, the Panel of Judges of the Supreme Court decided to try this case themselves. The Supreme Court judge stated that Evie Lany Mosintah (wife) received 1/2 part of the joint assets and the other 1/2 part was the inheritance which became the share of the deceased's heirs. Evie Lany Mosintah, who initially did not receive an inheritance from the deceased through the decision of the Makasar Religious Court and the Makasar Religious High Court, was determined by the Panel of Judges at the Supreme Court that Evie Lany Mosintoh received a share of the inheritance through a mandatory will, whose share was ¼.
Implikasi Media Sosial dalam Ketahanan Rumah Tangga: Tinjauan Putusan Cerai Talak No. 0064/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Adl Sri Afri Delia; Bahar, Muchlis; Elfia
USRAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Januari
Publisher : LPPM STAI Muhammadiyah Probolinggo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46773/usrah.v6i1.1522

Abstract

This study aims to analyze how social media usage affects marital discord, focusing on the case of Decision Number 0064/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Adl at the Andoolo Religious Court. The research employs a normative juridical approach and qualitative methods, with primary data sourced from the court decision and supporting references from Islamic legal literature and related journals. The findings reveal that improper use of social media, such as excessive communication with third parties, can undermine trust and harmony within a household. Based on Article 39 Paragraph (2) of Law Number 1 of 1974, Article 19 letter (f) of Government Regulation Number 9 of 1975, and Article 116 letter (f) of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), the Religious Court granted the divorce suit in this instance, citing continuous disputes with no hope of reconciliation. The judges also considered the Islamic principle that preventing harm takes precedence over pursuing benefit. This study emphasizes the value of digital literacy as a safeguard against family disputes brought on by social media use.  
Pembatalan Perkawinan dalam Hukum Islam dan Komparasinya dengan Hukum Positif Indonesia: Annulment of Marriage in Islamic Law and Its Comparison with Indonesian Positive Law Ade Daharis; Salma; Elfia
Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains Vol. 8 No. 6: Juni 2025
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/jks.v8i6.7942

Abstract

Perkawinan merupakan lembaga yang memiliki makna sakral serta kedudukan hukum yang kuat, baik menurut ajaran agama maupun dalam sistem hukum nasional Indonesia. Perkawinan didirikan dengan tujuan untuk membentuk keluarga yang sah, harmonis, dan sejahtera, yang sejalan dengan norma hukum dan nilai-nilai keagamaan yang berlaku. Tetapi dalam kenyataannya, tidak semua perkawinan dilaksanakan dengan memenuhi persyaratan hukum dan ketentuan agama yang berlaku. Dalam situasi tertentu, suatu perkawinan dapat dibatalkan apabila terdapat pelanggaran terhadap syarat-syarat sahnya perkawinan, baik karena adanya cacat hukum pada pelaksanaan akad, penipuan, paksaan, maupun ketidaksahan wali atau saksi. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menyelidiki secara menyeluruh dasar hukum pembatalan perkawinan, proses pembatalan, dan konsekuensi hukum dari pembatalan perkawinan dalam sistem hukum Indonesia, khususnya berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI). Studi ini menggunakan yuridis normatif dan doktrinal. Data dianalisis secara kualitatif setelah dikumpulkan melalui studi pustaka. Studi menunjukkan bahwa keputusan pengadilan agama yang membatalkan perkawinan memiliki kekuatan hukum yang mengikat. Meskipun demikian, hak-hak pihak ketiga yang bertindak dengan niat baik tetap dilindungi oleh hukum setelah pembatalan perkawinan, dan status hukum anak yang dilahirkan dari perkawinan tersebut tidak terpengaruh.
Perpindahan Hak Hadhanah Pasca Perceraian (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 406K/AG/2016) Mardiyah, Siti; Elfia
JAS : Jurnal Ahwal Syakhshiyyah Vol 6 No 1 (2024): Jurnal Ilmiah Ahwal Syakhshiyyah (JAS)
Publisher : Fakultas Agama Islam UNISMA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33474/jas.v6i1.21258

Abstract

Based on general provisions, mothers are more entitled to have hadhanah rights for children who are not yet mumayyiz. However, in Supreme Court Decision Number 406K/AG/2016, the judge decided to transfer the hadhanah rights for children who have not yet mumayyiz from the mother's side to the father's side. This makes the Supreme Court's decision a Contra Legem decision which is not based on formal legal normative rules. So the aim of this research is (1) to analyze the considerations of the panel of judges in the Supreme Court decision number 406K/AG/2016 (2) to a nalyze the decision from the perspective of maslahah murlah. The research method used is normative juridical, namely legal research by reviewing library materials or secondary data. The results of this research: (1) The judge's considerations in deciding the case are based on the welfare and best interests of the child. (2) Even though the Supreme Court Decision Number 406K/AG/2016 is contra legem, the decision aims to eliminate harm and create benefits, from a fiqh perspective this does not conflict with the rules of Maqashid syari’ah . Keywords: Hadhanah, Putusan Mahkamah Agung, Maslahah Mursalah
Co-Authors Ade Daharis Bahar, Muchlis Muchlis Bahar Muddin, Ilhammuddin Nur Fazila Salma Siti Mardiyah Sri Afri Delia Zulfan