Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

Forging Paths: A Systematic Review on the Interplay of Government Policies, Technological Advancements, and Business Growth through the Role of Economic Innovation. Riwayadi, Eko; Umran, M. Fankar; Murti, Tri Hesti; Monoarfa, Maya; Waisapi, Jeffry Yuliyanto; Cahyono, Bambang Tri
International Journal of Management and Business Intelligence Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): February 2024
Publisher : MultiTech Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59890/ijmbi.v2i1.1453

Abstract

The 21st-century global economic landscape is characterized by unprecedented complexity, shaped by the dynamic interplay of government policies, technological advancements, economic innovation, and business growth. This systematic review, anchored in established economic theories such as the Innovation Systems Theory and the Triple Helix Model, seeks to unravel the intricate relationships among these key elements. Findings reveal a consistent pattern where government policies exert significant influence on the pace and direction of technological advancements. Economic innovation emerges as a crucial mediating factor, linking policy influence to subsequent impacts on business growth. Noteworthy themes include the role of regulatory frameworks, the importance of collaboration for innovation, and the varied pathways through which technological advancements contribute to business growth. The alignment of results with the conceptual framework underscores the relevance and validity of the identified relationships. Theoretical implications enrich established economic theories, while practical insights empower businesses to navigate evolving government policies through strategic innovation and adaptability. This systematic review contributes a comprehensive understanding of the interconnected dynamics shaping the contemporary economic landscape, offering a valuable roadmap for informed decision-making and sustained growth.
Influence of Strategic Planning on Banking Performance via Differentiation Strategy Waisapi, Jeffry Yuliyanto
Nomico Vol. 1 No. 8 (2024): Nomico - September
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/jxnarj41

Abstract

Effective strategic planning plays a crucial role in enhancing the performance of banking businesses. This research aims to analyze the impact of strategic planning on banking business performance through the implementation of differentiation strategy. Utilizing a quantitative approach, primary data was collected through surveys distributed to senior managers from several banks operating in various markets. Multiple linear regression analysis was employed to evaluate the relationship between strategic planning, strategic differentiation, and business performance. The research findings indicate that strategic planning significantly influences strategic differentiation in the context of the banking industry. Additionally, strategic differentiation also positively contributes to banking business performance. The implications of these findings are that banks implementing effective strategic planning tend to adopt better differentiation strategies, thereby enhancing their performance in facing intense market competition. This study provides valuable contributions to understanding the relationship between strategic planning, strategic differentiation, and business performance in the banking context. The results offer guidance for banks to improve their strategic planning practices and implement effective differentiation strategies to strengthen their competitive position in the market. Future research could explore additional factors influencing this relationship and broaden the industry scope to validate these findings more comprehensively.
Influence of Strategic Planning on Banking Performance via Differentiation Strategy Waisapi, Jeffry Yuliyanto
Nomico Vol. 1 No. 9 (2024): Nomico-Oktober
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/wd6v9g17

Abstract

Effective strategic planning plays a crucial role in enhancing the performance of banking businesses. This research aims to analyze the impact of strategic planning on banking business performance through the implementation of differentiation strategy. Utilizing a quantitative approach, primary data was collected through surveys distributed to senior managers from several banks operating in various markets. Multiple linear regression analysis was employed to evaluate the relationship between strategic planning, strategic differentiation, and business performance. The research findings indicate that strategic planning significantly influences strategic differentiation in the context of the banking industry. Additionally, strategic differentiation also positively contributes to banking business performance. The implications of these findings are that banks implementing effective strategic planning tend to adopt better differentiation strategies, thereby enhancing their performance in facing intense market competition. This study provides valuable contributions to understanding the relationship between strategic planning, strategic differentiation, and business performance in the banking context. The results offer guidance for banks to improve their strategic planning practices and implement effective differentiation strategies to strengthen their competitive position in the market. Future research could explore additional factors influencing this relationship and broaden the industry scope to validate these findings more comprehensively.         
Analysis of Construction Dispute Resolution Reform Perspective of Law Number 2 of 2017 Waisapi, Jeffry Yuliyanto
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 4 No. 6 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (September-October 2024)
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v4i6.780

Abstract

Indonesia is pursuing development to enhance welfare through projects like office buildings, housing, and infrastructure. The involvement of societal levels is crucial for success. However, development can trigger disputes from differing interpretations or contractual provisions. This study focuses on analyzing reforms in construction dispute resolution under Law No. 2 of 2017, utilizing a quantitative survey approach. The Construction Services Acts of 1999 and 2017 marked significant shifts in philosophical outlook and dispute resolution mechanisms. Findings indicate that the 2017 Act emphasizes non-litigious settlements with a "win-win" approach, though challenges remain regarding the term "court." Despite these challenges, the study acknowledges that Indonesia is progressing towards effective construction dispute resolution. It recommends stricter sanctions for violations of construction agreements to enhance future regulatory frameworks. These insights are vital for legal practitioners and policymakers, aiming to refine mechanisms and raise public awareness on regulatory gaps that hinder sustainable development in Indonesia. The study also categorizes dispute resolution solutions and scrutinizes provisions in Law No. 2 of 2017 concerning defects, nonconformities, weaknesses, and perceived biases. The Act defines a team formed by mutual agreement to oversee Construction Services, tasked with preventing and mediating disputes arising from Construction Work Contracts
A Juridical Analysis of the Implications of Constitutional Court Decision No. 60/PUU/XXII/2024 Paving the Way for Political Parties Without Regional Representative Council Seats in Nominating Regional Heads Waisapi, Jeffry Yuliyanto
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 4 No. 6 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (September-October 2024)
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v4i6.781

Abstract

The Constitutional Court's Decision No. 60/PUU/XXII/2024 has altered the nomination requirements for regional head elections, allowing political parties without seats in the Regional Representative Council to nominate candidates. This change is seen as a progressive step in strengthening democracy by broadening opportunities for small and emerging parties. However, it also introduces risks and challenges, such as the potential reinforcement of political dynasties, increased money politics, and political fragmentation at the local level. This study aims to analyze the juridical implications of the decision on Indonesia's regional head election system. The research method employed is normative legal method with a juridical analysis approach to relevant legislation, including the 1945 Constitution, the Regional Head Election Law, and Decision No. 60/PUU/XXII/2024. The study's data sources are secondary, comprising legal documents, academic literature, and news articles discussing related issues. The findings indicate that while the decision has the potential to expand political participation and strengthen democracy, significant risks related to political stability and the integrity of the election process remain. Therefore, strict oversight and effective law enforcement are necessary to ensure that these changes positively impact Indonesia's democracy.
Is Legal Reform the Answer to Dispute Resolution in the Construction Services Sector? A Critical Look at Law No. 2 of 2017 Waisapi, Jeffry Yuliyanto; Suhartono, Slamet; Mangesti, Yovita Arie; Latumahina, Rosalinda Elsina; Young, Felina C
Journal of Law and Legal Reform Vol. 5 No. 4 (2024): Contemporary Issues on Law Reform in Indonesia and Global Context
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jllr.v5i4.4310

Abstract

Disputes in the construction services sector are inevitable due to the complexity of contracts, project delays, cost overruns, and quality issues. Law No. 2 of 2017 on Construction Services seeks to reform dispute resolution mechanisms by emphasizing alternative dispute resolution (ADR), mediation, and arbitration while ensuring legal certainty and fairness. This study analyzes these reforms using a quantitative survey approach to assess their effectiveness and identify existing gaps. The Construction Services Acts of 1999 and 2017 marked significant philosophical and procedural shifts, with the latter focusing on non-litigious settlements through a win-win approach. However, challenges remain, particularly regarding the interpretation of the term "court" and the enforcement of decisions. Findings indicate that while Law No. 2 of 2017 promotes ADR mechanisms, enforcement issues, contractual inconsistencies, and power imbalances between large developers and smaller contractors hinder its effectiveness. The Act also establishes a team formed by mutual agreement to oversee construction services and mediate disputes, yet concerns persist over defects, nonconformities, weaknesses, and perceived biases in its implementation. Despite these challenges, Indonesia is progressing toward more effective construction dispute resolution. To enhance future regulatory frameworks, this study recommends stricter sanctions for violations of construction agreements and improved procedural clarity. Comparative insights from international legal frameworks suggest that Indonesia could benefit from integrating global best practices, such as adjudication boards and expedited arbitration. These findings are crucial for legal practitioners and policymakers in refining dispute resolution mechanisms and raising public awareness of regulatory gaps that hinder sustainable development.
Is Indonesia’s Company Law Ready to Turn the Page on Outdated Liquidation Procedures? Waisapi, Jeffry Yuliyanto
Journal of Law and Legal Reform Vol. 5 No. 3 (2024): Various Issues on Law Reform in Indonesia and Beyond
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jllr.v5i3.4335

Abstract

Business practices in Indonesia increasingly rely on Limited Liability Companies (LLCs), which are central to various sectors, including trade, industry, finance, and insurance. Liquidation, the process of dissolving an LLC and settling its assets, plays a critical role when a company ceases operations. This study examines the legal framework governing LLC liquidation under Law No. 40 of 2007 on Limited Liability Companies (UUPT), using a normative juridical approach. It highlights the liquidator's role in the dissolution process, grounded in Article 1233 of the Indonesian Civil Code, which outlines that legal relationships arise from consent or law. Upon liquidation, the liquidator assumes responsibility for managing the company’s assets and liabilities, as mandated by Article 149, paragraph (1) of the UUPT. The liquidator’s duties include collecting assets, notifying creditors, publishing liquidation notices in newspapers and the State Gazette, and distributing remaining funds to shareholders. The liquidator must also provide a final report to the General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) or the court for approval. Once the report is accepted, the LLC is formally dissolved and ceases to exist as a legal entity. This study reveals the need for reform in the liquidation procedures, emphasizing the complexity of managing the dissolution process in today’s interconnected business environment. With evolving commercial dynamics, the current legal framework may require updates to streamline liquidation and ensure more effective resolution for all stakeholders involved.