Articles
<![CDATA[Penggunaan Instrumen Hukum Administrasi Negara Dalam Perkara Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang PT Asuransi Jiwa Kresna ]]>
<![CDATA[Ali Samiaji, Yasin Nur Alamsyah Hidayat]]>;
<![CDATA[Latumahina, Rosalinda Elsina]]>
<![CDATA[ JHP17 (Jurnal Hasil Penelitian) Vol 7 No 1: Januari 2022 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30996/jhp17.v7i1.6057
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini membahas terkait ratio decidendi Putusan MA No. 647K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2021 yang dikaitkan dengan penggunaan UU No. 30/2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan (UU AP) sebagai dasar pertimbangan dalam pengesahan PKPU terhadap perusahaan asuransi dalam perkara PKPU PT Asuransi Jiwa Kresna sebagaimana telah diputus PKPU sementara dalam putusan No. 389/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2020/PN-Niaga.Jkt.Pst. tertanggal 10 Desember2020 dan telah dibatalkan setelah diajukan upaya hukum Kasasi dengan diputus batal dalam Putusan MA No. 647K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2021. Menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan bahan kajian hukum positif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa OJK sebagai lembaga negara independen atau dalam Hukum Tata Negara disebut sebagai quasi eksekutif yang kedudukannya diatur oleh UU terikat pada keseluruhan peraturan perundangan termasuk UU AP. Namun untuk penggunaan instrumen hukum administrasi negara dalam hal ini Pasal 53 ayat (3) UU AP tentang fiktif positif tidaklah tepat. Karena dalam Pasal 53 ayat (2) UU AP mengisyaratkan ketentuan fiktif positif dapat dilaksanakan jika tidak terdapat ketentuan perundangan yang terkait aturan tentang batas waktu untuk menetapkan putusan. Sedangkan terkait batas waktu OJK dalam merespon permohonan telah diatur dalam Pasal 51 ayat (2) UU No. 40/2014 tentang Perasuransian juncto Pasal 54 ayat (1) POJK No. 28/POJK.05/2015 diberikan waktu paling lama 30 (tiga puluh) hari sejak permohonan diterima secara lengkap. Disisi lain penggunaan UU AP adalah sebuah kesalahan mendasar karena permohonan PKPU diperiksa dan diadili berdasar ketentuan UU yang bersifat umum diluar koridor UU bersifat khusus. Prosedur pengajuan permohonan PKPU diatur melalui UU khusus sesuai asas lex specialis derogat legi generalis, maka permohonan PKPU harus diperiksa dan diputus berdasarkan koridor hukum dalam ketentuan UUKPKPU.Kata Kunci: Penundaan Pembayaran, Otoritas Keuangan, Administrasi Negara]]>
<![CDATA[HUBUNGAN KEPERDATAAN ANTARA ANAK LUAR KAWIN DAN ORANGTUANYA: STUDI PERBANDINGAN DENGAN HUKUM KELUARGA DI BELANDA ]]>
<![CDATA[Latumahina, Rosalinda Elsina]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UI Scholars Hub ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Post Constitutional Court Decision No. 46 / PUU-VIII / 2010 dated February 17, 2012 on the amendment of Article 43 paragraph (1) of Marriage Act, many questions still raised regarding the implementation of the aforementioned article to establish civil relations between children born out of wedlock and their parents, especially with the father. The verdict by Supreme Court that rejected the lawsuit by Hj. Aisha Mochtar regarding legal status of her son, as well as several other court decisions indicate that there are various interpretations of the Article so that Article 43 paragraph (1) of Marriage Act cannot be implemented properly. It makes the author feel the necessity to do a comparative study with other country. The option to do a comparative study imposed on Dutch Law because the Dutch Civil Code / Nieuw Burgelijk Wetboek prevailing in the Netherlands today is the development of BW which is still in force in Indonesia. The results shows that the regulation of civil between children born out of wedlock and their parents in the Netherlands has given a better legal protection and legal certainty for children born out of wedlock than the applicable law in Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Agen Travel Atas Kegagalan Keberangkatan Haji dan Umrah ]]>
<![CDATA[Alfin, Rizaldi Mochammad]]>;
<![CDATA[Latumahina, Rosalinda Elsina]]>
<![CDATA[ SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, April 2024 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v3i2.1270
<![CDATA[Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perlindungan hukum yang diberikan kepada pengguna biro perjalanan haji dan umrah apabila calon jemaah haji dan umroh tidak berangkat sesuai jadwal, dan untuk mengetahui sejauh mana biro perjalanan tersebut dalam kapasitasnya sebagai Penyelenggara ibadah haji dan umrah, bertanggung jawab atas kegagalan tersebut. Penelitian ini mengikuti metodologi penelitian hukum normatif yang memadukan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan berbasis kasus. Kajian ini bersumber pada tiga sumber informasi hukum: sumber primer, sumber sekunder, dan sumber tersier. UU No. 13 Tahun 2008 tentang Penyelenggaraan Penyelenggaraan Ibadah Haji dan Materi Keagamaan Nomor 8 Tahun 2008 (2018) menguraikan tentang perlindungan hukum bagi pengguna biro jasa, demikian penelitian ini. Untuk memenuhi persyaratan Pasal 19 UU No. 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen, biro jasa telah memberikan mekanisme akuntabilitas kepada salah satu konsumennya.]]>
<![CDATA[Legal Consequences of Forgery of Authentic Deeds on the Legal Validity of the Deed ]]>
<![CDATA[Faizeh, Nurul]]>;
<![CDATA[Latumahina, Rosalinda Elsina]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): Journal Evidence Of Law (Desember) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[CV. Era Digital Nusantara ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.59066/jel.v3i3.770
<![CDATA[In the context of law enforcement, a notary is a public official who works in the legal industry and contributes to societal legal certainty. According to Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary, a notary is a state organ authorized by the state (hence abbreviated as UUJN). There is legal confusion for notaries in the event that they make mistakes in the performance of their responsibilities and authorities due to the overlap between the application of criminal law governed in the Penal Code (KUHP) and the UUJN. According to UUJN, a notary may face civil, administrative, or ethical code of the notary profession sanctions if they violate the law while performing their duties. The purpose of this study is to comprehend and clarify the legal ramifications of authentic deed forging on the deed's legal validity as well as the criminal responsibility of notaries who engage in this practice. This study employed a normative, legislative, and conceptual approach as its methodology. The findings of this study suggest that the legal ramifications of forging authentic deeds on their legal validity are as follows: if a prerequisite for the deed's creation is not fulfilled, it will lose its uniqueness and be deemed legally defective, meaning it will be deemed invalid and have no valid probative value.]]>
<![CDATA[Consumer Protection against Upselling Practices in Food Product Marketing Strategies ]]>
<![CDATA[Ulya, Selma Lailatul]]>;
<![CDATA[Latumahina, Rosalinda Elsina]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (April) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[CV. Era Digital Nusantara ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i1.978
<![CDATA[In the marketing industry, sales strategies are essential to increase the number of product sales. Business actors use various sales strategies to ensure that their goods sell quickly in the market and in demand, making customers tempted. The transaction process that occurs in the relationship between business actors and consumers continues to develop, which has an impact on changes in the legal construction that occurs in the relationship between business actors and consumers. The practice of upselling, which is often used by business actors in the food industry, can potentially harm consumers if it lacks transparency and clear consent. Therefore, efforts to provide protection to consumers are important in this era of free trade. This study aims to assess the extent to which upselling practices comply with existing regulations, as well as provide recommendations to regulators and stakeholders regarding consumer protection and the development of stricter regulations or ethical guidelines. The research method used is normative and legal, using secondary data sources and based on primary law. The findings show that although upselling is allowed, business actors must provide accurate information to consumers. This research concludes that there is a need for stricter law enforcement and increased awareness of businesses and consumers about their rights and obligations to prevent harmful practices.]]>
<![CDATA[Perspektif Hukum Perdata Indonesia dan Hukum Kanonik terhadap Perceraian dalam Komunitas Katolik ]]>
<![CDATA[Larantukan, Rafael Suban]]>;
<![CDATA[Latumahina, Rosalinda Elsina]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (April) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[CV. Era Digital Nusantara ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i1.1011
<![CDATA[The objective of this study is to analyze the legal validity of divorce within the Indonesian Civil Law system and Canon Law of the Catholic Church, as well as to identify its legal implications for Catholics in Indonesia. Under Indonesian Civil Law, divorce is considered valid based on specific grounds such as adultery, domestic violence, and continuous disharmony. In contrast, Canon Law of the Catholic Church views marriage as a perpetual sacrament that cannot be dissolved except through an annulment, which requires specific conditions. This study employs a normative juridical approach using legal analysis through literature reviews and relevant legislation. The findings reveal that the conflict between civil law and canon law significantly impacts the social, moral, and spiritual aspects of Catholics. Divorce under civil law is often not recognized by the Church, leading to divorced individuals being considered still bound by the sacrament of marriage. This situation creates social stigma and alienation from the church community, as well as limits their access to certain sacraments.]]>
<![CDATA[PRAKTIK KAWIN TANGKAP DI SUKU SUMBA DITINJAU DARI PRESPEKTIF HAK ASASI MANUSIA ]]>
<![CDATA[Nengi, Umbu]]>;
<![CDATA[Latumahina, Rosalinda Elsina]]>
<![CDATA[ COURT REVIEW Vol 5 No 01 (2025): ILMU HUKUM ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[COMMUNITY OF RESEARCH LABORATORY (KELOMPOK KOMUNITAS LABORATORIUM PENELITIAN) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.69957/cr.v5i01.1777
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini mempunyai tujuan guna mengetahui sudut pandang hak asasi manusia yang mendasari adat kawin tangkap suku Sumba. Adat kawin tangkap adalah adat perkawinan di mana calon suami atau keluarganya biasanya menangkap calon mempelai perempuan. Karena mengandung aspek pemaksaan dan pelanggaran hak asasi manusia, praktik ini menuai kontroversi, penelitian yuridis normatif melalui studi kepustakaan merupakan metodologi yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini. Praktik kawin culik merupakan kegiatan yang dilakukan dengan paksaan dan tanpa seizin kedua belah pihak yang ialah pelanggaran HAM, berdasarkan kajian yang telah dilakukan. Konsep-konsep hak asasi manusia seperti universalitas, kesetaraan, nondiskriminasi, dan ketidakterpisahan, saling ketergantungan, dan keragaman hak, semuanya dilanggar oleh kawin culik. Selain itu, layaknya sudah direvisi dengan UU No. 16 Tahun 2019 dan UU No. 39 Tahun 1999 perihal HAM, kawin tangkap juga berlawanan dengan UU No. 1 Tahun 1974 perihal Perkawinan.]]>
<![CDATA[Analisis Kesesuaian Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Nomor 2/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2024/PN Niaga Smg dengan Prinsip Tes Insolvensi. ]]>
<![CDATA[Ramadhini, Nabila Alya]]>;
<![CDATA[Latumahina, Rosalinda Elsina]]>
<![CDATA[ Yustitiabelen Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): Januari, 2025 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Tulungagung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.36563/yustitiabelen.v11i1.1383
<![CDATA[Prosedur yuridis yang diatur dalam UU No. 37 Tahun 2004 mengenai Kepailitan dan Penangguhan Kewajiban Pelunasan Utang (selanjutnya direferensikan sebagai Instrumen Hukum Kepailitan) merupakan mekanisme formal dalam sistem perundangan. Penelaahan komprehensif ini bermaksud untuk mengeksplorasi, menganalisis, dan mengungkapkan validitas putusan yudisial dari Majelis Peradilan Komersial dengan No.Registrasi 2/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2024/PN Niaga Smg dalam konteks kesesuaiannya dengan prinsip-prinsip fundamental evaluasi insolvensi. Metodologi riset ini yang diaplikasikan merupakan kajian yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan multidimensional meliputi analisis peraturan perundangan, kerangka konseptual, serta pendekatan komparatif untuk menghasilkan temuan komprehensif. Output studi mengartikan bahwasanya ketidaksesuaian pertimbangan hakim terkait pembuktian sederhana terkait solven atau tidaknya seorang debitur menunjukkan bahwa masih terdapat kelemahan dalam pertimbangan hakim yang telah disampaikan sebelumnya, yang didukung dengan belum adanya instrumen hukum yang mengikat dan memaksa sebagai acuan hakim dalam memberikan pertimbangannya. Diperlukan upaya perbaikan, yang dapat dimulai dari mengubah ketentuan fakta-fakta yang dapat dibuktikan secara sederhana sebagai bentuk proses kepailitan yang mampu diselesaikan dalam interval temporal terbatas, namun tetap memperhatikan secara mendalam status keuangan kreditor melalui prosedur evaluasi kemampuan solvensi yang telah lama diterapkan oleh yurisdiksi dengan sistem legislasi common law., sehingga ke depannya angka kepailitan dapat ditekan, khususnya bagi debitur yang masih solven.]]>
<![CDATA[Criminal Responsibility for Theft of Personal Data by Bank Employees and Misuse of Identity by Merchants Providing BRI EDC Cash Swipe Services ]]>
<![CDATA[Subroto, Bartholomews Kislew]]>;
<![CDATA[Latumahina, Rosalinda Elsina]]>
<![CDATA[ Activa Yuris: Jurnal Hukum Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas PGRI Madiun ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[The purpose of this study is Cash swipe transactions or commonly called Gestun, or the scientific term is called (Cash Withdrawal) to be a solution for credit card customers who want to make cash withdrawals but not through ATMs. Card customers simply visit shops that have credit card swipe machines (EDC), then withdraw cash according to the desired amount. By doing Gestun, credit card customers seem to be shopping for goods through the shop, but what is obtained is not goods but money. So customers do not take goods but take cash in the amount of the desired withdrawal or the value of the price of the goods. Credit cards are often the target of crime because of the benefits in their use; especially with made-up pretexts are the most common crimes because people often use credit cards for purchases and down payments based on credit facilities. Credit card fraud is usually called credit card misuse and can be classified into various categories: issuing credit cards through credit card companies, using credit cards at franchise stores and banks, and others. Credit card misuse due to the application of open laws to be disputed in accordance with various uses of credit cards Cash swipe is one form of credit card misuse. The purpose of writing this law is to find out the regulation and supervision of cash swipes in Indonesia and to find out how the responsibilities of the parties that facilitate cash swipes, especially for Acquirers and Merchants in Indonesia]]>
<![CDATA[Reconstruction of The Pawn Agreement Based on Justice ]]>
<![CDATA[Wasana, Budi]]>;
<![CDATA[Nasution, Krisnadi]]>;
<![CDATA[Latumahina, Rosalinda Elsina]]>
<![CDATA[ Batulis Civil Law Review Vol 6, No 2 (2025): VOLUME 6 ISSUE 2, JULY 2025 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.47268/ballrev.v6i2.2873
<![CDATA[Introduction: Legally, the clauses in the pawn agreement still contain clauses that conflict with the Consumer Protection Law Nomor 8 of 1999 Article 18 paragraph (1) letter a which states that business actors who offer goods and/or services intended for trading are prohibited from making or including standard clauses in each document and/or agreement if: they state the transfer of responsibility of the business actor. In the pawn agreement there are still missing clauses that should be included in the pawn agreement.Purposes of the Research: To analyze and find a reconstruction of the mortgage agreement based on justice.Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative juridical. Descriptive and argumentative techniques must be used in carrying out the analysis.Results Main Findings of the Research: Exoneration clauses are contrary to the principle of justice, therefore firm action from the authorities must be implemented without discrimination. This is done so that standard agreements made by business actors reflect the principle of justice. The purpose and objective of having a fair agreement is to get a happy ending. If an exoneration clause is found in the agreement, in this case a pawn agreement, then it is necessary to reconstruct the agreement. So that a just and civilized humanitarian agreement and social justice for all Indonesian people are realized.]]>
