Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Navigating Ambiguity: Critiques of Indonesia's Health Law and its Impact on Legal Redress for Medical Malpractice Victims Amiati, Mia; Halim, Hamzah; Hassim, Jady Zaidi
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 10 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v10i1.5346

Abstract

In Indonesia, the fundamental right to health is enshrined in the 1945 Constitution, affirming every person's entitlement to live a safe and prosperous life with access to health services. The 2023 Health Law focuses on six pillars, including health security, funding, human resources, technology, primary care, and referral services, aiming to alleviate financial burdens through progressive financing. Particularly significant is the procedural change in protecting health workers, notably medical personnel, through the implementation of restorative justice methods. This article critically examines the implications of the 2023 Health Law on victim redress, particularly concerning medical personnel protection and the application of restorative justice in life-threatening medical error cases. However, the provision regarding the handling of medical personnel facing criminal allegations and disciplinary sanctions raises concerns regarding clarity and implementation. Ambiguities surrounding key terms and the prioritization of restorative justice mechanisms without clear guidelines may result in delays and inconsistencies in the legal process. This study sheds light on the need for clarity and refinement in legal frameworks to ensure the protection of both medical personnel and patients while promoting accountability and justice within the healthcare system.
Analisis Kasus Malapraktik di Rumah Sakit di Indonesia Dhamanti, Inge; Rachman, Taufik; Amiati, Mia
Jurnal Kebijakan Kesehatan Indonesia Vol 13, No 2 (2024): June
Publisher : Center for Health Policy and Management

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jkki.93363

Abstract

Malapraktik medis merupakan penyebab utama mortalitas dan morbiditas di seluruh dunia. Selama rentang tahun 2010-2015, Persatuan Perawat Nasional Indonesia memperkirakan adanya sekitar 485 kasus malapraktik dalam praktik keperawatan di Indonesia, terdiri dari 357 kasus malapraktik administratif, 82 kasus malapraktik sipil, dan 46 kasus malapraktik kriminal yang melibatkan unsur kelalaian.Tujuan dari studi ini adalah melakukan pemetaan terhadap kasus malapraktik yang terjadi di rumah sakit di Indonesia.Peneliti melakukan penelusuran kasus malapraktik pada Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia dari tahun 2011 sampai tahun 2021. Semua kasus malapraktik yang terjadi di rumah sakit masuk dalam kriteria inklusi. Setelah itu, dilakukan analisis deskriptif terkait kategori insiden, tenaga kesehatan yang terlibat, jenis dan status akreditasi rumah sakit.Hasil analisis terdapat 24 kasus malapraktik yang memenuhi kriteria inklusi. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, kasus malapraktik di Indonesia menyebabkan kecacatan permanen (37,5%), melibatkan dokter (95,8%), terjadi di rumah sakit swasta (75%), terjadi di rumah sakit tipe B (79,2%), dan terjadi di rumah sakit terakreditasi paripurna (70,4%).Berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang telah dilakukan dapat disimpulkan bahwa, masih banyaknya kasus malapraktik yang terjadi di rumah sakit di Indonesia. Studi ini juga menunjukkan bahwa tingginya status akreditasi rumah sakit belum tentu memberikan jaminan tidak terjadinya insiden.
Navigating Ambiguity: Critiques of Indonesia's Health Law and its Impact on Legal Redress for Medical Malpractice Victims Amiati, Mia; Halim, Hamzah; Hassim, Jady Zaidi
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 10 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v10i1.5346

Abstract

In Indonesia, the fundamental right to health is enshrined in the 1945 Constitution, affirming every person's entitlement to live a safe and prosperous life with access to health services. The 2023 Health Law focuses on six pillars, including health security, funding, human resources, technology, primary care, and referral services, aiming to alleviate financial burdens through progressive financing. Particularly significant is the procedural change in protecting health workers, notably medical personnel, through the implementation of restorative justice methods. This article critically examines the implications of the 2023 Health Law on victim redress, particularly concerning medical personnel protection and the application of restorative justice in life-threatening medical error cases. However, the provision regarding the handling of medical personnel facing criminal allegations and disciplinary sanctions raises concerns regarding clarity and implementation. Ambiguities surrounding key terms and the prioritization of restorative justice mechanisms without clear guidelines may result in delays and inconsistencies in the legal process. This study sheds light on the need for clarity and refinement in legal frameworks to ensure the protection of both medical personnel and patients while promoting accountability and justice within the healthcare system.