Ajmal Hadi Maulana
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Konsepsi Pemahaman Modern Kaum Mu’tazilah Dan Ajarannya Ajmal Hadi Maulana; Aprilliani Dwi Andini; Putri Sheila Az Zahra; Ratna Primada Dewi; Shafira Nazibah; Muhammad Parhan
Tabsyir: Jurnal Dakwah dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 3 (2024): Juli : Jurnal Dakwah dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : STAI YPIQ BAUBAU, SULAWESI TENGGARA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59059/tabsyir.v5i3.1278

Abstract

Muslims always respond to each other's political problems that occurred during the Islamic civilization. This led to the emergence of understanding from several groups, one of which was the Mu'tazilah. Known as the concept of thinking that separates itself because it prioritizes reason over revelation, this unknowingly contributes to understanding. Be neutral, by not confirming one or another's thoughts. This research was conducted to determine the existence of the Mu'tazilah and their teachings as an old view that should not be lost. With the analytical methods from previous research, it is hoped that it can provide an expansion of knowledge in the treasures of Islamic civilization regarding all existing understandings in the 21st century. The results of this article recommend academics and research experts to continue and develop research as a reference and new knowledge for the progress of Islam from time to time.
Menimbang Kebenaran: Paradigma Barat yang Berbasis Rasionalisme Vs. Islam yang Berbasis Wahyu Ajmal Hadi Maulana; Alwan Hafidz Darmawan; Dhia Shabrina Shaheeb; Indra Hadi Kurniawan; Muhamad Parhan
Hidayah : Cendekia Pendidikan Islam dan Hukum Syariah Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni : Hidayah : Cendekia Pendidikan Islam dan Hukum Syariah
Publisher : Asosiasi Riset Ilmu Pendidikan Agama dan Filsafat Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61132/hidayah.v2i2.1098

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the differences and similarities between the paradigm of Western rationalism, which places reason as the primary source of truth, and Islamic epistemology, which integrates revelation and reason in the pursuit of truth. The research employs a literature review method with a qualitative approach, drawing data from various scholarly works on Western and Islamic epistemological philosophy. A descriptive-comparative analysis is conducted to compare the fundamental concepts, methodologies, and implications of these two paradigms. The findings indicate that Western rationalism emphasizes reason and skepticism in verifying truth, with philosophers such as Descartes and Kant rejecting external authority in acquiring knowledge. Meanwhile, Islamic epistemology asserts that reason plays a crucial role but must align with revelation as the absolute source of truth. The study also finds that the dichotomy between revelation and reason is often misunderstood, whereas in Islam, they can complement each other. In conclusion, an integrative approach that combines the strengths of rationalism in scientific analysis with the moral and spiritual foundation of revelation can lead to a more comprehensive and applicable understanding in both knowledge and social life