Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 8 Documents
Search

Menilik Penerapan Teori Hukum Progresif dalam Sengketa Hak Asuh Anak: Analisis Kasus Putusan No. 0334/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Gdt Falah, Mohammad Bachrul; Siswanto; Ikhwan, Muhammad; Yurievna, Gritcenko Lyubov
Alauddin Law Development Journal (ALDEV) Vol 6 No 1 (2024): Social Justice Issues in The National and Global Context
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/aldev.v6i1.44216

Abstract

Article 105 of the Compilation of Islamic Law grants child custody primarily to the mother, ensuring the child's welfare. However, Decision No. 0334/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Gdt diverges from this, granting partial custody to the father. This research employs Sadjipto Rahardjo's progressive legal theory to analyze the decision. Despite the contradiction with Article 105, the decision embodies progressive legal values. The judge courageously adopts a joint custody model, prioritizing the child's welfare and justice. This approach allows both parents to care for the child, preserving the child's bond with each parent. The research contributes by showcasing how progressive legal principles can shape custody decisions, ultimately enhancing justice.
Menggagas Pertimbangan Childfree: Pendekatan Multidisiplin dan Interdisiplin Falah, Mohammad Bachrul; Rohmatuszahroh, Anita Intan
Syakhsiyah Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol 4 No 1 (2024): Syakhshiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/syakhshiyyah.v4i1.9252

Abstract

This research aims to explore childfree considerations from various perspectives involving ecology, macroeconomics and Islamic law. Therefore, a question arises, how is the consideration of childfree from the integration of various disciplines? The framework of the approach used is multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary, so that these disciplines are integrated and connected in the idea of childfree benefits. This research uses library research with a multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary approach. The results showed that ecological considerations regarding childfree revolve around the number of populations that affect the contribution of carbon emission gases. As for the country's economy, it considers the number of populations that affect macroeconomic stability. Islamic law in this context is contextual because childfree considerations are not normative. Such a multidisciplinary approach can be integrated into interdisciplinary. Contextual benefit-based Islamic law uses hifdz an-nafs to see the benefits of childfree in ecology. In addition, hifdz al-mal is used to look at macroeconomic considerations in this context. The ecology and economy of the country integrate with each other to form a balanced and more maslahah consideration between the two. This research contributes to considering the benefits of childfree comprehensively.
MUHAMMADIYAH AND URBAN MUSLIM GENDER EQUALITY ISSUES: NEO-TRADITIONALISM IN THE DECISION OF THE MAJELIS TARJIH AND TAJDID MUHAMMADIYAH ON HUSBAND AND WIFE RELATIONSHIP Falah, Mohammad Bachrul; Riyanta, Riyanta; Maliki, Ibnu Akbar
AKADEMIKA: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Vol 29 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/akademika.v29i2.9201

Abstract

The religious authority held by Islamic institutions is often confronted with issues of gender discrimination. In the modern era, Islamic organizations are faced with gender problems related to husband-wife relations in urban muslim communities. The proliferation of gender-biased narratives on social media and the shift in religious authority has challenged the discourse on gender equality in urban muslim communities. Meanwhile, in its development, Islamic organizations have produced progressive fatwas that show the movement for gender justice. This research uses Equilibrium Theory to analyze the periodic decisions of the Majelis Tarjih and Tajdid Muhammadiyah regarding the relationship between husband and wife. The results of the decision will be categorized through the typology of Islamic thought according to Ziba Mr-Hossen. This research is literature research that uses primary data in the form of decisions of the Majelis Tarjih and Tajdid Muhammadiyah compiled in Adāb al-Mar'ah fi al-Islām in 1982 and Keluarga Sakinah in 2014. The data was collected using the documentation method and analyzed using the content analysis technique. The results showed that the discourse of gender equality in Muhammadiyah influenced the balance of husband and wife roles in the Sakinah Family decision. The influence of gender equality does not necessarily make the results of the Sakinah Family decision fall into the category of modernism that is very open to Western thought. However, the decision only reaches the typology of neotraditionalism as a reflection of the moderatism of thought. The reason is that the fatwa decision still adopts the thoughts of classical scholars while still carrying the theme of renewal (tajdīd). Through its ijtihād, Muhammadiyah can create an inclusive dialogue space, accommodate various perspectives, and reflect the spirit of justice in the context of the diversity of urban muslim communities. This research is expected to be a symbol of dialogue between the discourse of gender equality and traditional religious authorities so that the dialectic can produce fatwas that are by the times.
Toward Interfaith Equality in Islamic Inheritance Law: Discourse and Renewal of Judicial Practice in Indonesia Riyanta; Najib, Agus Moh.; Bahiej, Ahmad; Falah, Mohammad Bachrul
Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Vol. 19 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Sharia Faculty of State Islamic University of Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri, Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/mnh.v19i1.10762

Abstract

The Supreme Court of Indonesia has granted portions of inheritance to non-Muslim relatives through the legal mechanism of wasiat wājibah (obligatory will), based on considerations of propriety and limited to no more than one-third of the estate. This article examines how the Supreme Court establishes the legal basis, rationale, and relevance of applying wasiat wājibah to non-Muslim relatives, and how this practice contributes to the reform of Islamic inheritance law in Indonesia. The study employs a normative legal research method with a case based approach. The findings reveal that the Supreme Court’s decisions to award wasiat wājibah to non-Muslim relatives represent a form of judicial innovation aimed at achieving maslahah (public benefit) among heirs. However, the application of wasiat wājibah remains case-specific, determined by the perceived benefit within the personal relationship between a Muslim testator and their non-Muslim relatives. These rulings hold significant relevance for the reform of Islamic inheritance law in Indonesia. First, conceptually, Islamic inheritance law falls under the domain of mu‘āmalah (civil transactions), which allows for reinterpretation and contextualization based on local realities. Second, the implementation of wasiat wājibah reflects a constructive response to the evolving social and legal dynamics of Indonesia’s pluralistic society.
Religion and Business: Capitalization of Religion in Online Ta'aruf Accounts Hidayat, Akhmad Alfian; Arifin, Ahmad Zainal; Falah, Mohammad Bachrul
Transformatif Vol 8 No 1 (2024): ISSUED IN APRIL 2024
Publisher : POSTGRADUATE OF PALANGKA RAYA STATE ISLAMIC INSTITUTION

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23971/tf.v8i1.7926

Abstract

Research on the capitalization of religion in online ta
Islamic Legal Traditionalism in the Consideration of Polygamous Validation (Analysis of Decisions on the Granting the Validation of Unregistered Marriage in Polygamy Cases After the Enactment of SEMA No. 3/2018) Herlina, Nina; Falah, Mohammad Bachrul; Hermawati, Kiki Ayu
Transformatif Vol 8 No 1 (2024): ISSUED IN APRIL 2024
Publisher : POSTGRADUATE OF PALANGKA RAYA STATE ISLAMIC INSTITUTION

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23971/tf.v8i1.7928

Abstract

After the enactment of SEMA No. 3/2018, the issue of unregistered polygamous validation has become a new polemic in religious courts. Decision No. 130/Pdt.G/2020/Ms.Bna and No. 311/Pdr.P/2022/PA.Bjb granted the application for unregistered polygamous validation, thus raising a question, what kind of legal considerations underlie the judges to oppose SEMA No. 3/2018? This study examines the consideration of granting the validation of unregistered polygamy by judges in the two decisions above to find out the typology of Islamic legal thinking in them. This research is a normative legal research with a case approach. The results showed that the judges used the legal doctrine of previous scholars as the basis for granting the application for the validation of unregistered polygamy, thus reflecting a traditional style of thinking. This thinking is evident when: 1) The judge based the validation of the applicant's second marriage only on the validity of the unregistered marriage; 2) The judge did not consider the conditions for the permissibility of polygamy due to emergency conditions; and 3) The judge also did not explore the potential power relations in the polygamy permit from the first wife which allowed for coercion. This research shows that the traditionalism of Islamic legal thought is used by judges to counter the policy of the Supreme Court Circular that has taken effect.
Digital Patriarchy: How Indonesian Islamic Preachers Construct Gender Asymmetry through YouTube Fatwas Falah, Mohammad Bachrul; Riyanta, Riyanta
Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol. 18 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ahwal.2025.18106

Abstract

Social media has emerged as a new platform for religious figures to disseminate fatwas (Islamic legal opinions). These platforms undoubtedly facilitate public access to pragmatic answers regarding Islamic legal issues. However, the credibility of fatwas issued on social media is frequently contested, particularly concerning gender bias. This study examines religious figures’ fatwas on YouTube about spousal relations through the lens of feminist theory. Employing a qualitative empirical approach, the research utilizes netnography as its data collection method. The findings reveal that most religious figures’ fatwas on position the wife in a state of economic dependence on her husband, while relegating her to domestic roles with obligations centered on fulfilling spousal domestic needs, particularly sexual demands. Such narratives starkly contradict principles of gender equality and perpetuate bias by potentially disregarding wives’ sexual agency. These fatwas stem from conservative interpretations of Q.S 4:34 by religious figures. [Media sosial muncul sebagai platform baru bagi tokoh agama untuk menyebarkan fatwa (pendapat hukum Islam). Platform ini memudahkan akses publik terhadap jawaban-jawaban praktis terkait persoalan hukum Islam. Namun, kredibilitas fatwa yang dikeluarkan di media sosial sering kali diperdebatkan, terutama terkait dengan bias gender. Penelitian ini mengkaji fatwa para tokoh agama di YouTube mengenai relasi suami-istri melalui perspektif teori feminis. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif, dalam beberapa hal penelitian ini menerapkan bagian dari kerja netnography sebagai teknik pengumpulan data. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sebagian besar fatwa yang disampaikan oleh para tokoh agama menempatkan istri dalam posisi ketergantungan ekonomi terhadap suaminya, sekaligus membatasi perannya pada ranah domestik dengan kewajiban yang berfokus pada pemenuhan kebutuhan rumah tangga suami, khususnya kebutuhan seksual. Narasi semacam ini secara jelas bertentangan dengan prinsip kesetaraan gender dan memperkuat bias dengan berpotensi mengabaikan agensi seksual istri. Fatwa-fatwa tersebut berakar pada tafsir konservatif terhadap Q.S. 4:34 oleh para tokoh agama.]
Spreading Husband-Wife Disgrace on Social Media: A Quranic Perspective Falah, Mohammad Bachrul; Ramadan, Taufan Fuad
Abdurrauf Journal of Islamic Studies Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Abdurrauf Journal of Islamic Studies
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Syekh Abdur Rauf Aceh Singkil, Aceh, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58824/arjis.v4i3.452

Abstract

The prevalent phenomenon of spreading spousal disgrace on social media raises significant concerns regarding communication ethics and poses a threat to marital harmony, while also disregarding Islamic values of privacy. This study aims to analyze the phenomenon of spreading spousal disgrace on social media from a Quranic perspective. Q.S. An-Nur: 19 is used as an analysis of the problem. Some books of tafsir as primary data serve to strengthen the argument. Secondary data were obtained from several books of tafsir and related scientific literature. The results of the study show that spreading a spouse's disgrace is inconsistent with the principles of Q.S. An-Nur (24): 19. The Qur'an offers two solutions, namely preventive and practical solutions. This paper shows that the Quran and its interpretation can be used to answer various problems related to digital transformation. Through this study, the Qur'an is expected to be a reference in solving contemporary issues. [Maraknya fenomena pengumbaran aib pasangan di media sosial menimbulkan problem etika komunikasi dan ancaman terhadap keharmonisan rumah tangga, sekaligus mengabaikan nilai-nilai privasi dalam Islam. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis fenomena pengumbaran aib pasangan di media sosial perspektif Al-Qur’an. Penelitian kepustakaan digunakan untuk memetakan dan menganalisis penelitian ini. Q.S. An-Nur (24): 19 digunakan sebagai analisis masalah. Beberapa kitab tafsir sebagai data primer berfungsi untuk memperkuat argumen. Data sekunder diperoleh dari beberapa kitab tafsir dan literatur ilmiah terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa menyebarkan aib pasangan tidak sesuai dengan prinsip-prinsip dalam Q.S. An-Nur: 19. Al-Qur'an menawarkan dua solusi, yaitu solusi preventif dan solusi praktis. Tulisan ini menunjukkan bahwa Al-Qur'an dan tafsirnya dapat digunakan untuk menjawab berbagai persoalan terkait transformasi digital. Melalui kajian ini, Al-Qur'an diharapkan dapat menjadi rujukan dalam menyelesaikan masalah-masalah kontemporer.]