Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.606
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Transformatif Alauddin Law Development Journal (ALDEV) Al-Manahij : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Akademika : Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Syakhshiyyah Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam West Science Islamic Studies Abdurrauf Journal of Islamic Studies
Falah, Mohammad Bachrul
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 9 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Transformatif

 1 
Religion and Business: Capitalization of Religion in Online Ta'aruf Accounts Hidayat, Akhmad Alfian; Arifin, Ahmad Zainal; Falah, Mohammad Bachrul
Transformatif Vol 8 No 1 (2024): ISSUED IN APRIL 2024
Publisher : POSTGRADUATE OF PALANGKA RAYA STATE ISLAMIC INSTITUTION

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23971/tf.v8i1.7926

Abstract

Research on the capitalization of religion in online ta
Islamic Legal Traditionalism in the Consideration of Polygamous Validation (Analysis of Decisions on the Granting the Validation of Unregistered Marriage in Polygamy Cases After the Enactment of SEMA No. 3/2018) Herlina, Nina; Falah, Mohammad Bachrul; Hermawati, Kiki Ayu
Transformatif Vol 8 No 1 (2024): ISSUED IN APRIL 2024
Publisher : POSTGRADUATE OF PALANGKA RAYA STATE ISLAMIC INSTITUTION

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23971/tf.v8i1.7928

Abstract

After the enactment of SEMA No. 3/2018, the issue of unregistered polygamous validation has become a new polemic in religious courts. Decision No. 130/Pdt.G/2020/Ms.Bna and No. 311/Pdr.P/2022/PA.Bjb granted the application for unregistered polygamous validation, thus raising a question, what kind of legal considerations underlie the judges to oppose SEMA No. 3/2018? This study examines the consideration of granting the validation of unregistered polygamy by judges in the two decisions above to find out the typology of Islamic legal thinking in them. This research is a normative legal research with a case approach. The results showed that the judges used the legal doctrine of previous scholars as the basis for granting the application for the validation of unregistered polygamy, thus reflecting a traditional style of thinking. This thinking is evident when: 1) The judge based the validation of the applicant's second marriage only on the validity of the unregistered marriage; 2) The judge did not consider the conditions for the permissibility of polygamy due to emergency conditions; and 3) The judge also did not explore the potential power relations in the polygamy permit from the first wife which allowed for coercion. This research shows that the traditionalism of Islamic legal thought is used by judges to counter the policy of the Supreme Court Circular that has taken effect.
Co-Authors AD, Muhammad Irfan Agus Moh. Najib, Agus Moh. Ahmad Bahiej, Ahmad Arifin, Ahmad Zainal Hermawati, Kiki Ayu Hidayat, Akhmad Alfian Mahatta, Afdhalia Maliki, Ibnu Akbar Muhammad Ikhwan Nina Herlina Ramadan, Taufan Fuad Riyanta Riyanta Riyanta, Riyanta Rohmatuszahroh, Anita Intan Siswanto Yurievna, Gritcenko Lyubov