Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Analisis Yuridis Terjadinya Peristiwa Konflik Bersenjata Ukraina dan Rusia Ditinjau dari Perspektif Hukum Humaniter Internasional Asya, Jasran; Rahayu, Sakthi; Widianto, Alfin Prananda
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1896

Abstract

Over the past half century, almost every country has been involved in armed conflicts either domestically or with other nations. One example is the escalating armed conflict between Ukraine and Russia, resulting in many civilian casualties and damaging public infrastructure, which is considered a violation of the provisions of international humanitarian law. This research was conducted using normative juridical methods by examining legal materials obtained through literature study. The findings of this research indicate that the Russian Armed Forces have committed various violations contrary to the principles of humanitarian law, such as the principles of military necessity, humanity, and proportionality. Violations of these principles may include disproportionate attacks, targeting civilians, excessive use of force, and restrictions on humanitarian assistance. Resolving this conflict requires a comprehensive approach and the commitment of all parties involved, such as urging Russia and Ukraine to fulfill their obligations as UN members by respecting applicable international humanitarian law provisions under the principle of pacta sunt servanda, mediating through diplomatic channels, imposing sanctions by the UN against both countries for violations of international humanitarian law as accountability for the attacks committed, and urging the UN Security Council to issue a resolution to immediately cease the hostilities.
The Consistency of National Health Insurance Implementation in Achieving Health Equity Asya, Jasran; Suryono, Arief; Makbul, Ahmad
Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan Vol 8 No 3 (2024): Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan
Publisher : Universitas Islam Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33474/hukeno.v8i3.22572

Abstract

The Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia mandates the state to fulfill health equity. The amendments to the Constitution reformed the health sector by decentralizing authority from the central government to regional governments. Both the regional and central governments share responsibility for health funding through public health efforts and individual health efforts. However, the National Social Security System Law and the Social Security Agency Law, which form the basis of the National Health Insurance program, were drafted and implemented without involving regional governments. This has widened the disparity in the availability of healthcare facilities and medical personnel between developed and underdeveloped regions. This research aims to assess the National Social Security System Law and the Social Security Agency Law in terms of their consistency with the Constitution and their synchronization with the Regional Government Law and the Health Law in achieving health equity. Additionally, it examines the role of regional governments in funding individual health efforts under the National Health Insurance program. This normative explanatory research, based on secondary data, investigates various legal norms related to the funding of individual health efforts by regional governments. The research concludes that the funding of individual health efforts under the National Health Insurance program by he Social Security Agency Law is inconsistent with the Constitution and is not synchronized with the Regional Government Law and the Health Law. Legislative corrections to the National Health Insurance program-related laws are necessary to involve regional governments.
Taxes as an Implementation of Pancasila Ideology in Counteracting the Negative Effects of Capitalism Abdur Rozaq, Muhammad; Asya, Jasran; Novita, Eva; Fraistifina, Fraistifina; Priyanto, Yuwono
Edunity Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Vol. 2 No. 12 (2023): Edunity: Social and Educational Studies
Publisher : PT Publikasiku Academic Solution

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57096/edunity.v2i12.184

Abstract

Globalization and industrialization that link the ideas of capitalism are not under the ideology of Pancasila and Indonesia's national development is implemented based on economic democracy. The 1945 Constitution, Article 23A has established taxes as a source of funding for Indonesia's national development. The real threat of capitalism is environmental destruction and social inequality. This is necessary to counteract the negative effects of the influence of capitalism. This study aims to analyze the implementation of Pancasila ideology through the tax system to counteract the negative impact of the influence of capitalism. This research is legal and applies legal approaches and deductive analysis methods. The results showed that tax law contains legal certainty as a prevention of arbitrary practices and a form of democracy. The Tax Law contains benefits, by cooperating with every citizen to participate in the implementation of development through the payment of taxes. The Tax Law contains justice through the redistribution of income so that disadvantaged people can enjoy the same opportunities as those who are better able to achieve prosperity prospects.
Perspektif Perjanjian Untung-Untungan Terhadap Penyelesaian Pembayaran Klaim Asuransi Jiwa (Studi Kasus Putusan No. 2207/Pdt.G/2023/PA.JB) Asya, Jasran; Pragiswa, Remonth; Amroyasir, Inal; Andryawan, Andryawan
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i1.3440

Abstract

Perjanjian Asuransi merupakan bentuk Perjanjian Untung-Untungan (Kans Overeenkomst), di mana hasilnya, baik berupa keuntungan maupun kerugian bagi para pihak, bergantung pada peristiwa yang tidak pasti. Asuransi berfungsi sebagai langkah mitigasi risiko terhadap ketidakpastian di masa depan dengan cara mengalihkan risiko kepada pihak ketiga. Penelitian ini mengkaji teori, prinsip, dan elemen Perjanjian Untung-Untungan serta menerapkannya secara kritis untuk menganalisis kasus sengketa asuransi jiwa syariah yang diputuskan oleh Pengadilan Agama Jakarta Barat (Putusan No. 2207/Pdt.G/2023/PA.JB). Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menjawab dua permasalahan utama: apakah perjanjian asuransi dalam kasus ini dapat dikategorikan sebagai Perjanjian Untung-Untungan, dan apa implikasi hukumnya bagi para pihak yang terlibat dalam perjanjian tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Data diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan, dianalisis secara kualitatif, dan kesimpulan diambil secara deduktif. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa perjanjian asuransi dalam Putusan No. 2207/Pdt.G/2023/PA.JB memenuhi karakteristik Perjanjian Untung-Untungan dan memiliki implikasi bagi para pihak untuk menerima hak-hak mereka dan memenuhi kewajiban mereka secara timbal balik.
Analisis Yuridis Terjadinya Peristiwa Konflik Bersenjata Ukraina dan Rusia Ditinjau dari Perspektif Hukum Humaniter Internasional Asya, Jasran; Rahayu, Sakthi; Widianto, Alfin Prananda
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1896

Abstract

Over the past half century, almost every country has been involved in armed conflicts either domestically or with other nations. One example is the escalating armed conflict between Ukraine and Russia, resulting in many civilian casualties and damaging public infrastructure, which is considered a violation of the provisions of international humanitarian law. This research was conducted using normative juridical methods by examining legal materials obtained through literature study. The findings of this research indicate that the Russian Armed Forces have committed various violations contrary to the principles of humanitarian law, such as the principles of military necessity, humanity, and proportionality. Violations of these principles may include disproportionate attacks, targeting civilians, excessive use of force, and restrictions on humanitarian assistance. Resolving this conflict requires a comprehensive approach and the commitment of all parties involved, such as urging Russia and Ukraine to fulfill their obligations as UN members by respecting applicable international humanitarian law provisions under the principle of pacta sunt servanda, mediating through diplomatic channels, imposing sanctions by the UN against both countries for violations of international humanitarian law as accountability for the attacks committed, and urging the UN Security Council to issue a resolution to immediately cease the hostilities.