Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unes Law Review Journal of Indonesian Rural and Regional Government (JIRReG) Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan
Gusti Bintang Maharaja
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Relevansi Badan Khusus dalam Penanganan Sengketa Pemilihan Umum Kepala Daerah di Indonesia Sulistyowati, Sulistyowati; Dewi Nadya Maharani; Indri Palindangan; Gusti Bintang Maharaja
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2098

Abstract

Election dispute management is a vital element in maintaining the integrity of the democratic process in Indonesia. Electoral conflicts can arise at various stages, from the nomination process, campaigning, voting, to the determination of election results. Therefore, it is very important to have an effective and fair mechanism to resolve such disputes. This study examines the mechanisms and institutions involved in the resolution of electoral disputes in Indonesia. Reviewing the development of regulations related to election disputes and efforts to improve the system that has been done, including the role of the Constitutional Court, the election supervisory board, and the General Election Commission. The author uses qualitative research methods by collecting data from various literature sourced from the internet. This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of how to resolve electoral disputes, as well as to identify challenges and opportunities in the improvement of the electoral dispute resolution system. With a better understanding of existing mechanisms and regulations, it is expected to increase public confidence in the electoral process and strengthen democracy in Indonesia. This study evaluates various efforts that have been made to improve the electoral dispute resolution system, such as regulatory reform, capacity building of related institutions, and community participation in overseeing the electoral process. Thus, it is expected that the results of this study can contribute significantly to the development of the democratic system in Indonesia.
PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM PADA PERJANJIAN KERJASAMA YANG DIBUAT OLEH MUHAMMAD NUZUL SEBAGAI PIHAK DALAM PERJANJIAN BERDASARKAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 3198 K/Pdt/2010 Debby Nauli Rafeyfa S.; Tiara Frianita Putri; Gusti Bintang Maharaja; Kayla Namira R. F. Balfas; Sulastri, Sulastri
Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 8 No. 7 (2024): Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.3783/causa.v8i7.7557

Abstract

This study aims to analyze unlawful acts in a cooperation agreement based on Supreme Court Decision Number 3198 K/Pdt/2010, involving Muhammad Nuzul as a party to the agreement. The research focuses on identifying the elements of unlawful acts, including actions violating laws, causality, damages incurred, and errors or negligence committed. This study also discusses the court's considerations in resolving the case, including violations of the Notary Public Act, non-compliance with the validity requirements of agreements, and unfair profit distribution. The findings reveal that Muhammad Nuzul's actions constitute unlawful acts, involving abuse of office, violations of formal agreement procedures, and misuse of funds detrimental to other parties.
Integrasi Kebijakan Dalam Mengakomodir Kearifan Lokal; Studi Pembuatan Kartu Tanda Penduduk Sulistyowati; Adji Suradji Muhammad; Dewi Nadya Maharani; Gusti Bintang Maharaja
Journal of Indonesian Rural and Regional Government Vol 9 No 1 (2025): Rural and Regional Government
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Pemerintahan Sekolah Tinggi Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa "APMD" Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47431/jirreg.v9i1.504

Abstract

Mengintegrasikan hukum adat secara lebih efektif dalam sistem hukum nasional, pemerintah dapat menciptakan kebijakan yang lebih adil dan sesuai dengan realitas pluralitas masyarakat Indonesia. Dalam sejarah, hukum adat memainkan peran vital dalam mengatur aspek kehidupan masyarakat adat, namun pergeseran peran terjadi seiring dengan perkembangan zaman, digantikan oleh hukum positif. Pergantian ini tidak hanya menciptakan pergeseran peran, tetapi juga menimbulkan sejumlah permasalahan, seperti blind-spot dalam kebijakan publik. Sebagai contoh, dalam administrasi KTP, hanya enam agama resmi yang diakui, mengabaikan keberagaman kepercayaan masyarakat adat seperti Sunda Wiwitan. Hal ini menciptakan ketidaksesuaian antara kebijakan publik dan hak-hak masyarakat adat. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode domain analysis untuk menjelajahi problematika hukum tertulis dan tidak tertulis dalam domain komunitas adat. Teknik pengumpulan data melibatkan analisis dokumen hukum dan perundang-undangan, serta laporan mengenai pertentangan antara hukum adat dan hukum negara di masyarakat marjinal. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan perlunya refleksi dan pembaharuan dalam kebijakan publik untuk mengakomodasi keberagaman masyarakat adat. Pengakuan dan penghormatan terhadap kepercayaan masyarakat adat dapat mengatasi blind-spot, menciptakan kebijakan yang lebih inklusif dan sesuai dengan realitas pluralitas masyarakat Indonesia. Dengan demikian, penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi untuk memahami dan memecahkan tantangan hukum yang dihadapi masyarakat adat dalam konteks perkembangan hukum positif.
Relevansi Badan Khusus dalam Penanganan Sengketa Pemilihan Umum Kepala Daerah di Indonesia Sulistyowati, Sulistyowati; Dewi Nadya Maharani; Indri Palindangan; Gusti Bintang Maharaja
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2098

Abstract

Election dispute management is a vital element in maintaining the integrity of the democratic process in Indonesia. Electoral conflicts can arise at various stages, from the nomination process, campaigning, voting, to the determination of election results. Therefore, it is very important to have an effective and fair mechanism to resolve such disputes. This study examines the mechanisms and institutions involved in the resolution of electoral disputes in Indonesia. Reviewing the development of regulations related to election disputes and efforts to improve the system that has been done, including the role of the Constitutional Court, the election supervisory board, and the General Election Commission. The author uses qualitative research methods by collecting data from various literature sourced from the internet. This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of how to resolve electoral disputes, as well as to identify challenges and opportunities in the improvement of the electoral dispute resolution system. With a better understanding of existing mechanisms and regulations, it is expected to increase public confidence in the electoral process and strengthen democracy in Indonesia. This study evaluates various efforts that have been made to improve the electoral dispute resolution system, such as regulatory reform, capacity building of related institutions, and community participation in overseeing the electoral process. Thus, it is expected that the results of this study can contribute significantly to the development of the democratic system in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Adji Suradji Muhammad Debby Nauli Rafeyfa S. Dewi Nadya Maharani Indri Palindangan Kayla Namira R. F. Balfas Sulastri Sulastri Sulistyowati Sulistyowati Sulistyowati Tiara Frianita Putri