Haeruddin, Haeruddin
Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika, Universitas Tadulako

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Peningkatan kemampuan memecahkan masalah antara model penalaran kausal berbasis etnosains dan sains modern Supriyadi, Supriyadi; Haeruddin, Haeruddin; Nurjannah, Nurjannah
Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Pendidikan Fisika Vol 3, No 2 (2016): Vol 3: Oktober 2016
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (184.567 KB) | DOI: 10.12928/jrkpf.v3i2.5142

Abstract

Penelitian ini betujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan kemampuan memecahkan masalah fisika antara model penalaran kausal berbasis etnosains dengan sains modern. penelitian ini menggunakan desain penelitian “The Non Equivalen Pretest-Postest Design”. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X pada MA Al-Khairaat Pusat Palu. Sampel dipilih secara Proportional Sample, dengan sampel penelitian adalah kelas XD dan kelas XC. Hasil analisa data yang diperoleh adalah kemampuan memecahkan masalah fisika kelas eksperimen pertama rata-rata 17,11 dengan standar deviasi 3,82 dan kelas eksperimen kedua rata-rata 14,30 dengan standar deviasi 4,07. Berdasarkan hasil pengujian hipotesis diperoleh thit = 2,03 dengan kriteria adalah terima Ho jika -2,02 < t < 2,02 dan tolak Ho dalam hal lainnya. nilai thitung berada di luar penerimaan Ho. Dengan demikian Ho ditolak sedangkan H1 diterima dan dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan kemampuan memecahkan masalah antara model penalaran kausal berbasis etnosains dengan sains modern. This study aims to determine the difference between the ability to solve problems of physics-based models of causal reasoning etnosains with modern science. The design of this research study "The Non equivalent Pretest-Posttest Design". The study population was all students of class X in the MA Al-Khairaat Palu Center. Samples selected Proportional Sample, the sample is first class and the class XC XD. Results of analysis of the data obtained is the ability to solve the problem of experimental physics first class average of 17.11 with a standard deviation of 3.82 and the second experimental class average of 14.30 with a standard deviation of 4.07. Based on the hypothesis testing results obtained thit = 2.03 with the criteria is accept Ho if -2.02 <t <2.02 and reject Ho in other cases. tcount is outside the reception Ho. Thus Ho is rejected while H1 is accepted and concluded that there are differences between the models of problem-solving skills-based causal reasoning etnosains with modern science.
Analysis of Attitudes and Approaches to Problem Solving: Gender Differences and Education Levels Haeruddin Haeruddin; Kamaluddin Kamaluddin; Amiruddin Kade; Albar Rabak Pabianan
Radiasi : Jurnal Berkala Pendidikan Fisika Vol. 15 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37729/radiasi.v15i1.1816

Abstract

The main problem in this research is the low ability of students to solve physics problems. Students' attitudes and approaches to problem-solving are allegedly related to the way they study physics and their success in solving physics problems. This study demonstrated student attitudes and approaches to solving physics problems using Attitudes and Approaches to Problem Solving (AAPS) survey questions using quantitative methods. Data were collected from 1045 students. Data analysis was carried out by grouping the data by gender and education level. The t-test was used to see the differences in each group. The result showed no statistically significant differences between men and women (t = -1,65 dan Sig. = 0,098 > 0,05). In addition, there was a significant difference in the level of education between collect students with junior and senior high school education levels (p < 0.05). The implications for practice, and the directions for future research are discussed.
Peningkatan kemampuan memecahkan masalah antara model penalaran kausal berbasis etnosains dan sains modern Supriyadi Supriyadi; Haeruddin Haeruddin; Nurjannah Nurjannah
Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Pendidikan Fisika Vol 3, No 2 (2016): Vol 3: Oktober 2016
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (184.567 KB) | DOI: 10.12928/jrkpf.v3i2.5142

Abstract

Penelitian ini betujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan kemampuan memecahkan masalah fisika antara model penalaran kausal berbasis etnosains dengan sains modern. penelitian ini menggunakan desain penelitian "The Non Equivalen Pretest-Postest Design". Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X pada MA Al-Khairaat Pusat Palu. Sampel dipilih secara Proportional Sample, dengan sampel penelitian adalah kelas XD dan kelas XC. Hasil analisa data yang diperoleh adalah kemampuan memecahkan masalah fisika kelas eksperimen pertama rata-rata 17,11 dengan standar deviasi 3,82 dan kelas eksperimen kedua rata-rata 14,30 dengan standar deviasi 4,07. Berdasarkan hasil pengujian hipotesis diperoleh thit = 2,03 dengan kriteria adalah terima Ho jika -2,02 < t < 2,02 dan tolak Ho dalam hal lainnya. nilai thitung berada di luar penerimaan Ho. Dengan demikian Ho ditolak sedangkan H1 diterima dan dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan kemampuan memecahkan masalah antara model penalaran kausal berbasis etnosains dengan sains modern. This study aims to determine the difference between the ability to solve problems of physics-based models of causal reasoning etnosains with modern science. The design of this research study "The Non equivalent Pretest-Posttest Design". The study population was all students of class X in the MA Al-Khairaat Palu Center. Samples selected Proportional Sample, the sample is first class and the class XC XD. Results of analysis of the data obtained is the ability to solve the problem of experimental physics first class average of 17.11 with a standard deviation of 3.82 and the second experimental class average of 14.30 with a standard deviation of 4.07. Based on the hypothesis testing results obtained thit = 2.03 with the criteria is accept Ho if -2.02 <t <2.02 and reject Ho in other cases. tcount is outside the reception Ho. Thus Ho is rejected while H1 is accepted and concluded that there are differences between the models of problem-solving skills-based causal reasoning etnosains with modern science.
Sosialisasi Mitigasi Bencana Alam Tanah Longsor melalui Konsep Fisika Terpadu di Kecamatan Palolo Kabupaten Sigi Amiruddin Hatibe; Muslimin Muslimin; Muhammad Syarif; Haeruddin Haeruddin
Bubungan Tinggi: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol 3, No 4 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20527/btjpm.v3i4.2748

Abstract

Bencana longsor merupakan salah satu peristiwa alam yang paling umum terjadi di Indonesia. Oleh karena itu, perlu adanya penambahan wawasan masyarakat tentang mitigasi bencana alam melalui kegiatan sosialisasi. Tujuan kegiatan pengabdian ini adalah untuk menambah wawasan pengetahuan fisika, teknik peringatan dini, dan mengenalkan faktor-faktor pendorong dan penghambat terjadinya bencana alam pada masyarakat Kecamatan Palolo. Kegiatan ini diikuti oleh 50 orang.  Metode yang digunakan adalah sosialisasi bencana alam tanah longsor. Hasil pengabdian ini adalah bertambahnya wawasan pemahaman masyarakat terhadap konsep fisika terpadu terhadap kondisi topografi Kecamatan Palolo, teknik peringatan dini dalam mitigasi terhadap ancaman bencana alam tanah longsor, dan menemukan faktor pendorong berupa sifat gotong royong dalam menangani bencana alam tanah secara tradisional yang sudah tumbuh dalam masyarakat sebagai suatu kearifan lokal dan menjadi perhatian dalam sosialisasi. Berdasarkan kegiatan pengabdian yang telah dilakukan dapat disimpulkan bahwa pentingnya konsep fisika yang sederhana pada masyarakat dalam menangani bencana tanah longsor, diperlukannya peringatan dini yang bersifat mitigasi dari tanda-tanda alam, dan tetap melestarikan kearifan lokal gotong royong untuk menyelesaikan masalah masyarakat desa, serta pentingnya perangkat desa memotivasi masyarakat pada setiap kali kegiatan sosialisasi atau pertemuan desa secara melembaga.  Landslides are one of the most common natural events in Indonesia. Therefore it is necessary to increase public knowledge about natural disaster mitigation through socialization activity. This community service aimed to broaden the knowledge of physics, early warning techniques and recognize the driving and inhibiting factors of natural disasters in the people of Palolo Subdistrict. Fifty people attended this community service. The method used was the socialization of landslide natural disasters. The results of this community service were increasing community understanding of integrated physics concept of the topographic conditions of Palolo District, early warning techniques in mitigating the threat of landslides, and finding driving factors in the form of cooperation in dealing with traditional land disasters that have grown in society as local wisdom and concern in socialization. Based on the community service that has been carried out, it can be concluded that the importance of simple physics concepts for the community in dealing with landslide disasters, the need for early warning that is mitigating natural signs, and still preserving the local wisdom of cooperation which has been in solving problems of the village community, as well as the importance of village officials motivating the community at every socialization activity or institutionalized village meeting.