Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

p-Index From 2020 - 2025

0.888

P-Index

This Author published in this journals

All Journal Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Pendidikan Fisika Momentum: Physics Education Journal JPF : JURNAL PENDIDIKAN FISIKA Media Eksakta

Nurjannah, Nurjannah

Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika, Universitas Tadulako

Author-ID : 757807

Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Mathematics Physics Other

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document

Claim Missing Document

Articles

Peningkatan kemampuan memecahkan masalah antara model penalaran kausal berbasis etnosains dan sains modern Supriyadi, Supriyadi; Haeruddin, Haeruddin; Nurjannah, Nurjannah
Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Pendidikan Fisika Vol 3, No 2 (2016): Vol 3: Oktober 2016
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Penelitian ini betujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan kemampuan memecahkan masalah fisika antara model penalaran kausal berbasis etnosains dengan sains modern. penelitian ini menggunakan desain penelitian âThe Non Equivalen Pretest-Postest Designâ. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X pada MA Al-Khairaat Pusat Palu. Sampel dipilih secara Proportional Sample, dengan sampel penelitian adalah kelas XD dan kelas XC. Hasil analisa data yang diperoleh adalah kemampuan memecahkan masalah fisika kelas eksperimen pertama rata-rata 17,11 dengan standar deviasi 3,82 dan kelas eksperimen kedua rata-rata 14,30 dengan standar deviasi 4,07. Berdasarkan hasil pengujian hipotesis diperoleh thit = 2,03 dengan kriteria adalah terima Ho jika -2,02 < t < 2,02 dan tolak Ho dalam hal lainnya. nilai thitung berada di luar penerimaan Ho. Dengan demikian Ho ditolak sedangkan H1 diterima dan dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan kemampuan memecahkan masalah antara model penalaran kausal berbasis etnosains dengan sains modern.Â This study aims to determine the difference between the ability to solve problems of physics-based models of causal reasoning etnosains with modern science. The design of this research study "The Non equivalent Pretest-Posttest Design". The study population was all students of class X in the MA Al-Khairaat Palu Center. Samples selected Proportional Sample, the sample is first class and the class XC XD. Results of analysis of the data obtained is the ability to solve the problem of experimental physics first class average of 17.11 with a standard deviation of 3.82 and the second experimental class average of 14.30 with a standard deviation of 4.07. Based on the hypothesis testing results obtained thit = 2.03 with the criteria is accept Ho if -2.02 <t <2.02 and reject Ho in other cases. tcount is outside the reception Ho. Thus Ho is rejected while H1 is accepted and concluded that there are differences between the models of problem-solving skills-based causal reasoning etnosains with modern science.

Peningkatan kemampuan memecahkan masalah antara model penalaran kausal berbasis etnosains dan sains modern Supriyadi Supriyadi; Haeruddin Haeruddin; Nurjannah Nurjannah
Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Pendidikan Fisika Vol 3, No 2 (2016): Vol 3: Oktober 2016
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Penelitian ini betujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan kemampuan memecahkan masalah fisika antara model penalaran kausal berbasis etnosains dengan sains modern. penelitian ini menggunakan desain penelitian "The Non Equivalen Pretest-Postest Design". Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X pada MA Al-Khairaat Pusat Palu. Sampel dipilih secara Proportional Sample, dengan sampel penelitian adalah kelas XD dan kelas XC. Hasil analisa data yang diperoleh adalah kemampuan memecahkan masalah fisika kelas eksperimen pertama rata-rata 17,11 dengan standar deviasi 3,82 dan kelas eksperimen kedua rata-rata 14,30 dengan standar deviasi 4,07. Berdasarkan hasil pengujian hipotesis diperoleh thit = 2,03 dengan kriteria adalah terima Ho jika -2,02 < t < 2,02 dan tolak Ho dalam hal lainnya. nilai thitung berada di luar penerimaan Ho. Dengan demikian Ho ditolak sedangkan H1 diterima dan dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan kemampuan memecahkan masalah antara model penalaran kausal berbasis etnosains dengan sains modern. This study aims to determine the difference between the ability to solve problems of physics-based models of causal reasoning etnosains with modern science. The design of this research study "The Non equivalent Pretest-Posttest Design". The study population was all students of class X in the MA Al-Khairaat Palu Center. Samples selected Proportional Sample, the sample is first class and the class XC XD. Results of analysis of the data obtained is the ability to solve the problem of experimental physics first class average of 17.11 with a standard deviation of 3.82 and the second experimental class average of 14.30 with a standard deviation of 4.07. Based on the hypothesis testing results obtained thit = 2.03 with the criteria is accept Ho if -2.02 <t <2.02 and reject Ho in other cases. tcount is outside the reception Ho. Thus Ho is rejected while H1 is accepted and concluded that there are differences between the models of problem-solving skills-based causal reasoning etnosains with modern science.

PENGARUH STRATEGI ROTATING TRIO EXCHANGE DALAM PEMBELAJARAN AKTIF TERHADAP PEMAHAMAN KONSEP FISIKA PADA SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI 13 PALU Nurjannah Nurjannah; Amiruddin Kade; Muhammad Jarnawi
Media Eksakta Vol 16 No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Tadulako

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji adanya pengaruh strategi rotating trio exchange dalam model pembelajaran aktif terhadap pemahaman konsep fisika pada siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 13 Palu. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan yaitu eksperimen kuasi dengan desain “The Equivalent Pretest-Posttest Design”. Sampel dipilih menggunakan teknik purposive sampling. Kelas VIII C sebagai kelas eksperimen dan kelas VIII D sebagai kelas kontrol. Instrumen yang digunakan berupa tes pemahaan konsep fisika dalam bentuk esai yang telah divalidasi oleh ahli. Berdasarkan hasil pengolahan data, diperoleh rerata skor pretest pemahaman konsep fisika siswa kelas eksperimen adalah 12,86 dengan standar deviasi 2,44, untuk rerata skor posttest adalah 20,77 dengan standar deviasi 2,49. Untuk kelas kontrol diperoleh rerata skor pretest 12,68 dengan standar deviasi 2,03, sedangkan untuk rerata skor posttest adalah 18,04 dengan standar deviasi 2,38. Analisis data dilakukan dengan teknik statistik uji-t dua pihak dengan taraf signifikan α=0,05. Diperoleh nilai hasil thitung = 2,77 dan ttabel = 2,02. Ini berarti bahwa nilai thitung berada diluar daerah penerimaan Ho. Hasil ini menunjukkan ada perbedaan antara kelas eksperimen dan kelas kontrol. Dengan demikian dapat disimpulkan bahwa, terdapat pengaruh strategi rotating trio exchange dalam pembelajaran aktif terhadap pemahaman konsep fisika pada siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 13 Palu.

The effect of ICT literacy on the pedagogical competence of physics teachers' Masrifah Masrifah; Wahyuni Handayani; Nurjannah Nurjannah; Dewi Amiroh
Momentum: Physics Education Journal Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Kanjuruhan Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21067/mpej.v6i2.6284

This study aims to determine the effect of ICT literacy on the pedagogic competence of high school physics teachers in North Maluku. This research is correlational quantitative research. The subjects in this study were 80 high school physics teachers with details of 60 female teachers and 20 male teachers. Data collection on ICT literacy and pedagogic competence of Physics teachers was carried out through tests using ICT literacy questions and pedagogical competencies of knowledge aspects. Furthermore, the re-search data were analyzed using a linear regression test with IBM SPSS 20 software. Based on the results of the study, it is known that the understanding of ICT literacy has a positive effect on the pedagogic competence of physics teachers in the aspect of knowledge. This can be seen from the coefficient value of the variable X of 0.614, which means the magnitude of the influence of X on Y is in a strong category because it has a percentage of 61.4%. The implication of the results of this study is one of the efforts to improve the pedagogic competence of teachers, namely by strengthening their ICT literacy, because the higher the ICT literacy of teachers, the higher their pedagogical competence.

Instrumen Gaya Berpikir: Membantu Adaptasi Kognitif dalam Penyelesaian Masalah Fisika Haeruddin Haeruddin; Jusman Jusman; Nurjannah Nurjannah; Muhammad Zaky
Media Eksakta Vol 19 No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Tadulako

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22487/me.v19i1.3484

This study aims to develop an instrument to measure thinking styles and their impact on cognitive adaptation in the context of physics problem solving. Understanding how individuals approach and solve physics problems can provide valuable insights into cognitive processes and strategies used. The instrument consists of various tasks designed to depict different thinking styles commonly employed in physics problem solving. These thinking styles include concrete sequential (CS), abstract sequential (AS), concrete random (CR), and abstract random (AR) thinking styles. This research follows the Research and Development (R&D) model. The development model used is the non-test instrument development model. The instrument utilizes a forced-choice model by asking respondents to determine the order of statements that best align with their condition when solving physics problems. The instrument provides four options ranging from very inappropriate to very appropriate. A total of 683 first-year students at Universitas Tadulako participated in the pilot study, and 364 in the implementation study. The expert judgment data analysis technique used the Aiken's formula. Empirical data analysis was conducted using the Ques program to test goodness of fit to the Partial Credit Model (PCM), item validity, and instrument reliability. The content validity result showed an Aiken's V value of .81, and the test reliability was .90. The average infit MNSQ value was 1.00 with a standard deviation of .18. This study found that physics education students at Universitas Tadulako tend to have an abstract sequential (AS) thinking style. The implications of these findings can be utilized to measure students' thinking style tendencies when solving physics problems.

Enhancing Cognitive and Argumentation Skills through Integration of Argument-Driven Inquiry and the Scientific Method in Physics Education Nurjannah, Nurjannah; Sani, Nurul Kami; Haeruddin, Haeruddin; Kade, Amiruddin; Khuzaimah, Andi Ulfah
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Vol. 13 No. 3 (2025): PENDIDIKAN FISIKA
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26618/9h25w918

Developing students’ cognitive abilities and scientific argumentation skills is critical in physics education, yet traditional teacher-centered approaches often fail to achieve these goals. This study investigates the impact of integrating the Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) model with the scientific method on students’ conceptual understanding and argumentation quality. A quasi-experimental pretest–posttest control group design was employed involving 64 Grade XI science students from a senior high school in Palu, Indonesia. Participants were assigned to an experimental group (ADI + scientific method) and a control group (ADI only) through a cluster random sampling method. Both groups studied the topic of heat and temperature over three sessions. Cognitive ability was measured using a validated multiple-choice test targeting understanding (C2), application (C3), and analysis (C4), while argumentation skills were assessed using an open-ended test based on Toulmin’s Argument Pattern. Results showed that the experimental group achieved higher normalized gains in cognitive ability (0.65, medium) compared to the control group (0.37, medium), and in argumentation skills (0.76, high) compared to 0.66 (medium). A strong positive correlation (r = 0.61, p < 0.001) was observed between cognitive and argumentation gains, indicating a reciprocal relationship. The novelty of this study lies in embedding scientific method phases into ADI’s discourse structure, producing measurable synergy between conceptual and epistemic outcomes. The findings contribute to physics education by offering an empirically supported instructional model that fosters both content mastery and scientific reasoning, providing a framework for enhancing scientific literacy in secondary classrooms.

Co-Authors Amiruddin Kade Dewi Amiroh Haeruddin Haeruddin Haeruddin Haeruddin Haeruddin, Haeruddin Jusman Jusman Khuzaimah, Andi Ulfah Masrifah, Masrifah Muhammad Jarnawi Muhammad Zaky Sani, Nurul Kami Supriyadi, Supriyadi Wahyuni Handayani

Title

Found 6 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 6 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 6 Documents
Search