Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.037
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Brawijaya Law Journal : Journal of Legal Studies Jambura Law Review Kosmik Hukum Sawerigading Law Journal
Hassan, Fareed Mohd
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Hukum Pencatatan Perkawinan Antar-Umat yang Berbeda Agama dan Kepercayaan di Indonesia Arif Maulana; Hassan, Fareed Mohd
Sawerigading Law Journal Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): September 2022 - Maret 2023
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Sawerigading Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62084/slj.v2i1.329

Abstract

Pemerintah bertanggung jawab dalam memberikan pelayanan publik sebagaimana diatur di dalam undang-undang nomor 23 tahun 2006 tentang Administrasi Kependudukan, Negara dengan tegas menjamin hak setiap penduduk untuk memperolah status kewargaan, membangun keluarga dan keturunan melalui perkawinan yang sah tercatat oleh negara, menjamin kebebasan memeluk agama, dan memilih tempat tinggal di wilayah Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Perkawinan menentukan sahnya perkawinan dalam Pasal 2 Ayat (1) bahwa perkawinan sah, apabila dilakukan menurut hukum masing-masing agama dan kepercayaannya itu. Sahnya perkawinan di Indonesia dinilai memiliki kekentalan nuansa agama, unsur agamawi yang mendominasi syarat sahnya perkawinan, maka terjadi degradasi capaian tujuan unifikasi Undang-Undang Perkawinan yang mengacu pada keseragaman terselenggaranya perkawinan bagi setiap warga negara. Deklarasi Universal Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM), Pasal 16 ayat (1) menyebutkan, “Laki-laki dan Perempuan yang sudah dewasa, dengan tidak dibatasi kebangsaan, kewarganegaraan atau agama, berhak untuk menikah dan untuk membentuk keluarga. Mereka mempunyai hak yang sama dalam soal perkawinan, di dalam masa perkawinan dan di saat perceraian"
Malaysia and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court Hassan, Fareed Mohd; Mohd Rusli, Mohd Hazmi Bin; Tajudin, Amalina Ahmad
Brawijaya Law Journal Vol. 9 No. 1 (2022): International Law and Security
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.blj.2022.009.01.06

Abstract

Through its founding treaty, the Rome Statute, the establishment of the International Criminal Court (ICC) has received support and opposition from many countries. Despite working toward universal ratification or accession to the Rome Statute, Signatories and State Parties to the Rome Statute have decided not to ratify and withdraw from being Member States due to, among other reasons, the issue of immunity and criminal responsibility of the Head of State, which are not in line with their respective Constitution, particularly by Malaysia. As such, this study analyzes the position of immunity of the Head of State as well as the criminal responsibility of a military commander under international law, particularly under the Rome Statute and the Malaysian Constitution. Based on doctrinal analysis, this study argues that the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, as the Malaysian Head of State and the Commander-in-Chief of the Malaysian Armed Forces, has immunity before the national court and, thus, will be highly exposed to ICC jurisdiction because the complementary principle under the Rome Statute cannot be implemented. This study concludes that being a part of the ICC Membership is untimely for Malaysia without the reconciliation of these contradictions.
The Palestinians’ Quest for Justice at the ICJ: The UNSC as a Stumbling Block? Hassan, Fareed Mohd; Sabaruddin, Nurul Azyani Zafirah; Yuliantiningsih, Aryuni; Arafat, Muhammad Rusli; Mega Jaya, Belardo Prasetya
Brawijaya Law Journal Vol. 11 No. 2 (2024): The Role Of Human Rights on ASIA Pacific Policies and Strategies
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.blj.2024.011.02.01

Abstract

Human rights abuses occurring in Gaza, including civilian casualties, have been countlessly reported. Despite numerous resolutions presented, particularly to the United Nations (UN) Security Council (UNSC), data from the UN reveals that they have unfortunately been vetoed. South Africa initiated a legal action before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) accusing Israel of breaching the 1948 Genocide Convention—a treaty to which both nations are Parties to. Based on doctrinal analysis, this paper raises one big question; whether the UNSC, that is supposed to uphold international peace and security, will become a stumbling block in the quest for justice for the Palestinian and fails to serve its purpose? This paper argues that judging from Netanyahu’s statement that Israel will not follow and perform any ICJ’s decisions and the United States, being one of the UNSC permanent members will use any necessary measures within the UNSC to prevent such decision from being enforced. This paper concludes that the veto power within the UNSC hinders the pursuit of justice for the Palestinians and the ability of certain member states to veto resolutions creates challenges in the Council’s effectiveness and compromises its capacity to address the conflict for the pursuit of justice.
Pretrial of the Seizure of Property Unrelated to Criminal Offenses: Between the Interests of Corruption Eradication and the Protection of Human Rights Wicaksana, Prasetyo Budi; Hassan, Fareed Mohd
Kosmik Hukum Vol. 26 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/kosmikhukum.v26i1.29668

Abstract

Asset seizure in corruption cases is an important instrument in efforts to recover state financial losses. However, in law enforcement practice, seizures are often carried out against goods or property that have no causal relationship with the alleged criminal offense. This condition creates tension between the interest of eradicating corruption and the protection of human rights, particularly the right to property and the guarantee of due process of law. This article aims to analyze pretrial remedies against the seizure of property unrelated to corruption offenses from the perspectives of law enforcement and human rights protection in Indonesia. This study employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, particularly through an examination of pretrial decisions of the Pekanbaru District Court concerning asset seizures in alleged corruption cases. The results indicate that seizures not supported by evidence of a direct connection to the criminal offense potentially violate the principle of legality, the principle of proportionality, and the protection of human rights as guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and national human rights instruments. Pretrial mechanisms play a strategic role as a form of judicial control over arbitrary coercive measures. Therefore, reforms are required in the seizure application mechanism by emphasizing strict substantive review and strengthening the role of pretrial proceedings to create a balance between the effectiveness of corruption eradication and the protection of citizens’ constitutional rights within the Indonesian criminal justice system.
Restorative Justice: Finding Common Ground Between Justice and Shared Interests Yustia, Dewi Asri; Jodi, Faris Fachrizal; Panjaitan, Ananda Chrisna D.; Hassan, Fareed Mohd
Jambura Law Review VOLUME 8 NO. 1 JANUARY 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33756/jlr.v1i1.32646

Abstract

In Indonesia’s current criminal justice practice, the resolution of criminal acts can be pursued through two main approaches: retributive justice, as regulated by the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), and restorative justice, which has gradually been adopted through various regulations at the stages of investigation, prosecution, and adjudication. Restorative justice emphasizes restoration rather than retribution by involving the offender, the victim, their respective families, and community figures in a collaborative process to reach a fair resolution. This study aims to examine the fundamental principles of restorative justice within the Indonesian criminal justice system and to propose a conceptual framework that promotes an integrative approach to resolving criminal cases by balancing the interests of all parties. Using a normative juridical method and a qualitative approach, the study finds that restorative justice is based on the principles of restitution, reconciliation, and social reintegration. To support its effective implementation, the concept should include the strengthening of legal norms concerning victims’ rights, the authority of law enforcement institutions, and the development of a justice system that embraces restorative values. Ultimately, the application of restorative justice is expected to shape a criminal justice system that is not only repressive but also ensures a balanced consideration of the interests of victims, offenders, and society as a whole.
Co-Authors Arafat, Muhammad Rusli Arif Maulana Jaya, Belardo Prasetya Mega Jodi, Faris Fachrizal Mohd Rusli, Mohd Hazmi Bin Panjaitan, Ananda Chrisna D. Rd. Dewi Asri Yustia Sabaruddin, Nurul Azyani Zafirah Tajudin, Amalina Ahmad Wicaksana, Prasetyo Budi Yuliatiningsih, Aryuni