Sapiddin, Andi Syahwiah A.
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

COLLECTION OF MONEY OR GOODS: LEGAL CERTAINTY and STATE RESPONSIBILITY Bango, Fikran S; Naswar; Sapiddin, Andi Syahwiah A.
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v6i1.1016

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the legal certainty of collecting money or goods in the midst of society, as well as what is the responsibility of the state that must be carried out in accordance with regulatory provisions. The type of research used is Normative Empirical legal research. The results obtained through literature studies and empirical data are then analyzed by the Normative Empirical method. The results showed that: 1). Legal certainty for the collection of money and goods in the community and the responsibility of the state which is tasked with overseeing the development of the collection of money and goods in Indonesia. 2) The fact of the development of philanthropic institutions in Indonesia is reviewed in the concept of philanthropy in Indonesia. Then the process of collecting money and goods must be in line with regulations.
COLLECTION OF MONEY OR GOODS: LEGAL CERTAINTY and STATE RESPONSIBILITY Bango, Fikran S; Naswar; Sapiddin, Andi Syahwiah A.
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v6i1.1016

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the legal certainty of collecting money or goods in the midst of society, as well as what is the responsibility of the state that must be carried out in accordance with regulatory provisions. The type of research used is Normative Empirical legal research. The results obtained through literature studies and empirical data are then analyzed by the Normative Empirical method. The results showed that: 1). Legal certainty for the collection of money and goods in the community and the responsibility of the state which is tasked with overseeing the development of the collection of money and goods in Indonesia. 2) The fact of the development of philanthropic institutions in Indonesia is reviewed in the concept of philanthropy in Indonesia. Then the process of collecting money and goods must be in line with regulations.
Data Integration Dysfunction in Passport Issuance: An Analysis of Material Legal Defects in the Population Documents of Foreign Nationals Padil, Muhammad; Sapiddin, Andi Syahwiah A.; Inggit, Andi Bau; Arifin, Ariani
SIGn Journal of Social Science Vol 6 No 2: Desember 2025 - Mei 2026
Publisher : CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37276/sjss.v6i2.690

Abstract

The enforcement of national identity sovereignty through selective immigration policy currently confronts systemic vulnerabilities arising from regulatory disharmony. The phenomenon of foreign nationals exploiting the self-registration system at the Class III Non-TPI Immigration Office of Tanjung Redeb demonstrates that public service applications lack robust validation capabilities due to the absence of real-time interconnection obligations with a population database. This study aims to analyze material legal defects in the population documents of foreign nationals and to evaluate the inter-agency dysfunction in data integration for passport issuance, while simultaneously highlighting the urgency of transforming biometric verification. This normative-empirical legal research employs the statute and case approaches, collecting data through in-depth interviews with two immigration officials, which were then analyzed using doctrinal instruments for State Administrative Law. The research results indicate that the paper-based population documents hold a void ab initio status due to their violation of sovereignty prerequisites. The sectoral synchronization failure forces immigration authorities to execute the law enforcement identification instrument of the Biometric Management System as the primary supervision mechanism. The synergy between the deterrence database and the apparatus’s capacity in formulating the Minutes of Examination successfully thwarted this administrative legal smuggling. Nevertheless, this jurisdictional isolation generates further implications for state administrative authority disputes. This study recommends regulatory harmonization mandating cross-ministerial Application Programming Interface interconnection, in which immigration electronic notifications must be recognized as preliminary evidence for regional population agencies to initiate revocation proceedings for materially defective documents.
Anatomy of Administrative Immigration Oversight Blind Spots: A Socio-Legal Study on the Paralysis of Early Warning Systems in Makassar Pawallangi, Andi Zhafwan Iqrar; Sapiddin, Andi Syahwiah A.; Latif, Birkah; Rastiawaty, Rastiawaty; Rivanie, Syarif Saddam
SIGn Journal of Social Science Vol 6 No 2: Desember 2025 - Mei 2026
Publisher : CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37276/sjss.v6i2.694

Abstract

This in-depth research investigates the anatomy of blind spots within post-admission administrative oversight mechanisms for foreign nationals at the Makassar Immigration Checkpoint and elucidates the causal determinants that trigger the paralysis of early warning systems. The urgency of this study stems from the high rate of overstays, which reflects structural dysfunction in immigration governance within the primary transit territory of Eastern Indonesia. Employing an empirical legal research method with a socio-legal approach, primary data are triangulated through in-depth interviews, field observations, and statistical analysis of violations. The research results uncover a critical discrepancy between digital data registration at the port of entry and continuous field surveillance, resulting in the state losing control over the dynamic nomadic movements of foreign legal subjects. Juridically, this systemic paralysis constitutes a violation of the Principle of Carefulness, triggered by a chronic human resource deficit in the intelligence unit and the nullity of regulatorily mandated cross-sectoral information technology interoperability. Consequently, law enforcement tends to be constrained by reactive patterns and dependent on repressive deportation measures during the repressive phase. This study concludes that a paradigm reorientation towards risk-based surveillance, the transformation of apparatuses into administrative data analysts, and the reinforcement of the legal framework mandating real-time inter-agency data integration are necessary. These policy implications constitute absolute prerequisites for restoring legal authority and guaranteeing state sovereignty through proactive prevention mechanisms in the preventive phase.