Abdallah, Raffi Ikzaaz
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Penghapusan KPK Serta Pelimpahan Hak, Kewajiban, dan Wewenang Aparatur Hukum Abdallah, Raffi Ikzaaz; Bintang A, Immanuel Given; Nadjima, Aulia Rachmatullah; Putra, Alfarel Endito; Tamir A, Sulthan Muhammad; Prasetyo, Handoyo
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 2, No 3 (2024): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.12188696

Abstract

The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) was founded in 2003 as a response to widespread corruption in Indonesia. The Corruption Eradication Committee has the authority to carry out investigations, prosecutions and prevent corruption. The KPK has succeeded in arresting and imprisoning many big-time corruptors, including high-ranking state officials. However, in recent years, the KPK has been faced with various challenges. One of the biggest challenges is the revision of the KPK Law (UU) which is considered to weaken the authority of the KPK. Apart from that, the Corruption Eradication Commission was also criticized because it was considered not transparent and accountable. In this article the author tries to look at the juridical review of the issue of eliminating the Corruption Eradication Commission. From the data obtained, it was found that First, the legal basis for disbanding the KPK must be considered carefully, considering the important role of this institution in eradicating corruption in Indonesia. The legal implications of disbanding the KPK are very important for the law enforcement system in Indonesia. This deletion could create gaps in the mechanisms for monitoring and prosecuting corruption cases and reduce public confidence in the Government's commitment to eradicating corruption. Third, the transfer of the rights, obligations and authority of the Corruption Eradication Committee to other legal entities must be carried out according to clear and transparent procedures.
Budaya Malu dan Penegakan Konstitusi Indonesia: Telaah Kritis atas Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Pelindung Konstitusi Mahardika, Agus; Wisnu, Bagas; Arthaleza, Fergie Brillian; Viano, Nurloise; Abdallah, Raffi Ikzaaz; Hendarwin, Rasendriya; Ramadhan, Raihan; Hagina, Rizki; Febrian, Matthew
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines the shame culture phenomenon in the context of constitutional enforcement in Indonesia, particularly through a critical lens on the Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023. The research investigates the transformation of the Constitutional Court's role from merely a negative legislator to a positive legislator, along with its ethical and constitutional implications. The research method used is normative juridical with conceptual and case approaches. The results indicate the subordination of shame culture to political interests in Constitutional Court decision-making, which potentially degrades the values of constitutionalism and judicial ethics. This study concludes that strengthening shame culture within constitutional judicial institutions is an urgent need to re-establish the constitution's dignity as an instrument for limiting power and preventing authoritarianism. Research recommendations include reforming the selection mechanism for constitutional judges, strengthening judicial codes of ethics, and increasing public participation in constitutional judicial oversight.
Wanprestasi/Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Ahli Waris Pengganti Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Perbankan Purnama, Rendika; Abdallah, Raffi Ikzaaz; Ramadhon, Daffa Charisma Putra; Febrian, Matthew; Mahardika, Agus; Tarina, Dwi Desi Yayi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Bank credit agreements are legally binding arrangements between debtors and creditors, including when the debtor passes away. In such cases, legal responsibility for the outstanding debt may be transferred to the substitute heirs. This study aims to examine the legal liability of substitute heirs in bank credit agreements and analyze acts of default or unlawful conduct that may arise when obligations are not fulfilled. The research employs a normative legal method with a descriptive approach and juridical analysis of legislation, jurisprudence, and legal doctrines. The results show that substitute heirs bear limited liability based on the portion of inheritance received. However, in practice, breaches of obligation often occur, either due to ignorance or intentional neglect, resulting in legal consequences that harm the bank as creditor. Therefore, strengthening regulations and educating the public on the legal responsibilities of heirs are essential to ensuring legal certainty and balanced protection for all parties in the banking system.