Hendarwin, Rasendriya
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Yuridis Keabsahan Peralihan Hak Atas Surat Berharga (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 5/PDT.G/2018/PN SLT) Gibran, Rizal Ananda; Avatar, Muhammad Raja; Hayatuddin, Raihan Ramadhan; Hendarwin, Rasendriya
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research examines the validity of rights transfer over negotiable instruments based on the District Court Decision Number 5/Pdt.G/2018/PN Slt. The issue arose when a land certificate registered under the heir was transferred to another heir without mutual consent. The study aims to explain legal provisions regarding the transfer of negotiable rights and analyze judicial considerations in resolving the dispute. The research used a normative juridical method by reviewing legal documents. The findings revealed that the transfer was legally defective due to the absence of approval from all rightful heirs. The court ordered the reversion of ownership and declared the previous transfer legally invalid. The conclusion highlights that the validity of rights transfer must follow legal procedures and fairness principles
Budaya Malu dan Penegakan Konstitusi Indonesia: Telaah Kritis atas Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Pelindung Konstitusi Mahardika, Agus; Wisnu, Bagas; Arthaleza, Fergie Brillian; Viano, Nurloise; Abdallah, Raffi Ikzaaz; Hendarwin, Rasendriya; Ramadhan, Raihan; Hagina, Rizki; Febrian, Matthew
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines the shame culture phenomenon in the context of constitutional enforcement in Indonesia, particularly through a critical lens on the Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023. The research investigates the transformation of the Constitutional Court's role from merely a negative legislator to a positive legislator, along with its ethical and constitutional implications. The research method used is normative juridical with conceptual and case approaches. The results indicate the subordination of shame culture to political interests in Constitutional Court decision-making, which potentially degrades the values of constitutionalism and judicial ethics. This study concludes that strengthening shame culture within constitutional judicial institutions is an urgent need to re-establish the constitution's dignity as an instrument for limiting power and preventing authoritarianism. Research recommendations include reforming the selection mechanism for constitutional judges, strengthening judicial codes of ethics, and increasing public participation in constitutional judicial oversight.