Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Budaya Malu dan Penegakan Konstitusi Indonesia: Telaah Kritis atas Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Pelindung Konstitusi Mahardika, Agus; Wisnu, Bagas; Arthaleza, Fergie Brillian; Viano, Nurloise; Abdallah, Raffi Ikzaaz; Hendarwin, Rasendriya; Ramadhan, Raihan; Hagina, Rizki; Febrian, Matthew
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines the shame culture phenomenon in the context of constitutional enforcement in Indonesia, particularly through a critical lens on the Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023. The research investigates the transformation of the Constitutional Court's role from merely a negative legislator to a positive legislator, along with its ethical and constitutional implications. The research method used is normative juridical with conceptual and case approaches. The results indicate the subordination of shame culture to political interests in Constitutional Court decision-making, which potentially degrades the values of constitutionalism and judicial ethics. This study concludes that strengthening shame culture within constitutional judicial institutions is an urgent need to re-establish the constitution's dignity as an instrument for limiting power and preventing authoritarianism. Research recommendations include reforming the selection mechanism for constitutional judges, strengthening judicial codes of ethics, and increasing public participation in constitutional judicial oversight.
Pembatasan Tingkat Komponen Dalam Negeri (TKDN) sebagai Hambatan Non-Tarif: Perspektif TRIMs dan Konsekuensi bagi Indonesia Arthaleza, Fergie Brillian
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 4, No 1 (2026): March
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17858040

Abstract

Indonesia uses the Domestic Component Level (TKDN) policy to strengthen the competitiveness of its national industry by increasing the use of local components, but its implementation is closely related to international obligations, particularly within the framework of the Agreement on Trade-Related Investment Measures (TRIMs). This study aims to analyze the regulation and implementation of TKDN in foreign investment and assess its compliance with TRIMs provisions, while identifying potential legal consequences if the policy is deemed inconsistent with WTO commitments. This study uses a normative legal method with a legislative, conceptual, and case approach, supported by primary legal materials in the form of TKDN and TRIMs Agreement regulations as well as secondary legal materials from academic literature. The results of the study show that although TKDN has strategic objectives such as encouraging technology transfer, increasing industrial capacity, and reducing import dependency, some of its provisions have the potential to fulfill the local content requirements prohibited by TRIMs. This condition could lead to the risk of disputes, trade retaliation, and a decline in foreign investor confidence. Therefore, policy harmonization is needed so that TKDN remains effective in supporting national industrial development without conflicting with Indonesia's international trade obligations.
Perlindungan Investor Dalam Mendorong Kemajuan Investasi Startup di Indonesia Melalui Pengembalian Keuntungan Tidak Sah Arthaleza, Fergie Brillian; Dirkareshza, Rianda
Jurnal Locus Penelitian dan Pengabdian Vol. 4 No. 12 (2025): JURNAL LOCUS: Penelitian dan Pengabdian
Publisher : Riviera Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58344/locus.v4i12.5172

Abstract

Ekosistem startup di Indonesia menghadapi tantangan pendanaan akibat penurunan investasi dan lemahnya perlindungan hukum di pasar modal. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji peran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) melalui POJK No. 65/POJK.04/2020 dalam meningkatkan perlindungan investor serta menilai dampaknya terhadap kesiapan investasi (investment readiness) startup. Dengan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif serta pendekatan perundang-undangan, kasus, dan konseptual, penelitian ini menganalisis keterkaitan mekanisme pengembalian keuntungan tidak sah (disgorgement) dengan kepercayaan investor. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan disgorgement, dana kompensasi kerugian investor, dan kewenangan remedial OJK memperkuat kepastian hukum, meningkatkan transparansi, dan mendorong kedisiplinan tata kelola startup. Mekanisme ini berdampak langsung pada peningkatan kepercayaan investor karena memberikan jaminan pemulihan kerugian, meskipun implementasinya masih menghadapi tantangan kapasitas pengawasan dan kompleksitas model bisnis digital. Dengan demikian, POJK No. 65/POJK.04/2020 tidak hanya menjadi instrumen perlindungan investor, tetapi juga berfungsi strategis dalam memperkuat investment readiness serta menciptakan iklim investasi startup yang lebih aman dan berkelanjutan.