Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Perbandingan Skor Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) Komprehensif Sebelum dan Saat Pandemi COVID-19 Fadhilah, Marita; Hiedayati, Nurul; Erfira, Erfira; Alifa, Ika; Cahyaningtyas, Ratu Nadia
Majalah Kedokteran Indonesia Vol 73 No 5 (2023): Journal of The Indonesian Medical Association - Majalah Kedokteran Indonesia, Vo
Publisher : PENGURUS BESAR IKATAN DOKTER INDONESIA (PB IDI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47830/jinma-vol.73.5-2023-1028

Abstract

Introduction: The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to changes in the methods of teaching and assessing medical students, shifting from face-to-face to online interactions. Various modifications have been made to the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) for achieving competency in preclinical students. However, the impact of these teaching and assessment methods during the pandemic has not been widely reported. This study aims to compare comprehensive OSCE scores before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in final-year preclinical medical students.Methods: This cross-sectional study involved data from final-year preclinical students at the Faculty of Medicine Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta (FMUINSHJ) who underwent OSCE in 2019, 2021, and 2022. The OSCE data included seven clinical competency areas. The data were then analyzed to compare the mean OSCE scores among the three student cohorts.Results: Among the three student cohorts (with respective sample sizes for 2019, 2021, and 2022: 82, 91, and 88), the highest mean score was obtained by students in the 2021 OSCE (score 63.75), while the lowest score was observed in the 2022 OSCE (score 60.20). Significant statistical differences were found among the seven competency areas in aspects such as history-taking ability, further diagnostic examination and data interpretation, diagnosis, and professionalism. Conclusion: There are differences in OSCE scores among final-year preclinical students before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Among the seven competency areas, online learning and assessment can be applied to skills related to history-taking, communication, non-pharmacological management, while other areas require direct hands-on experience.
A Comparative Study of Academic Performance in Myopic Students With and Without Vision Correction Erfira, Erfira; Febriandriani, Dini; Farida, Nida; Mahrunnisa, Fitria; Ulfah Irawati, Nur Bebi; Hermawati, Luluk; Usman, Muhammad
The Avicenna Medical Journal Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): The Avicenna Medical Journal
Publisher : Faculty of Medicine, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/avicenna.v6i1.46768

Abstract

Background: Vision is the primary way people get information and is crucial for the learning process. The World Health Organization (WHO) reports that 285 million people worldwide are visually impaired, with 42% of cases due to uncorrected refractive errors. School-age children are highly vulnerable to refractive errors, with myopia (nearsightedness) being the most common. A decrease in visual function due to myopia interferes with tasks requiring far vision, such as reading the blackboard, which can negatively impact academic performance. This study aims to compare the academic performance of patients with corrected and uncorrected myopia. Methods: This was a cross-sectional analytic study of 5th-grade elementary school students with myopia in Jakarta during 2023. Data collected included the students' average mid-semester exam scores and their myopia status, determined by visual acuity examinations. Results: Out of 106 respondents, 34% (36 people) had corrected myopia and 66% (70 people) had uncorrected myopia with 35 (33%) respondents having academic performance results below the passing grade. Bivariate analysis of the data using the Chi-square test yielded a p-value of 0.010 (p < 0.05). Conclusion: There is a significant relationship between academic performance results and the incidence of myopia.
Assessment of Medical Record Documentation and SOAP Completeness in Outpatient Services at a Primary Health Facility Hermawan, Erwin; Erfira, Erfira
International Journal of Health and Pharmaceutical (IJHP) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): February 2026
Publisher : CV. Inara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51601/ijhp.v6i1.507

Abstract

Medical records are essential for clinical decision-making, continuity of care, legal compliance, and accreditation. Despite their importance, incomplete documentation remains a significant challenge in primary health care, particularly in settings that rely on manual record-keeping. This study assessed the completeness of outpatient medical records at the general polyclinic of Klinik UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta and examined patterns in outpatient service utilisation, including patient demographics, insurance coverage, and referral trends. A mixed-methods design was employed, integrating quantitative analysis of 399 outpatient medical records from January to February 2024 with qualitative data from observations and interviews. The quantitative component evaluated the completeness of SOAP documentation, patient demographics, service utilisation, and referral rates. The qualitative component investigated workflow challenges, clinician perspectives, and factors influencing documentation quality. In January, 201 outpatient visits were recorded, and in February, 198 visits occurred. Each month, more than 64% of patients were female. BPJS beneficiaries accounted for 842% of all visits, indicating they were the predominant users of the service. Referrals increased from 21 in January to 41 in February, for a total of 62. SOAP documentation was largely complete in January but declined in February, with most omissions found in the Assessment and Objective sections. Fourteen incomplete SOAP components were identified over two months, with 12 occurring in February. Although service utilisation remained stable, documentation quality varied substantially. The frequent incompleteness of the Objective and Assessment components underscores the need for improved workflow organisation, enhanced clinician training, and the adoption of electronic medical records. Regular audits and standardisation of SOAP documentation are recommended to strengthen compliance and support accreditation.