Rinda Listyawati, Peni
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Legality of Credit Agreements with Fiduciary Guarantees made with Artificial Intelligence (AI) Hanim, Lathifah; Rinda Listyawati, Peni; Noorman, MS
Sultan Agung Notary Law Review Vol 6, No 2 (2024): June 2024
Publisher : Program Studi Master of Notary Law (S2), Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam SUltan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/sanlar.v6i2.42429

Abstract

Fiduciary Guarantee before being used as collateral in a credit agreement, it is mandatory to register the fiduciary first. Electronic fiduciary registration still has problems including network disruptions, system errors and is vulnerable to cyber attacks. Smart contract integration with electronic fiduciary guarantee registration can be a solution to these problems. Smart contract as a form of artificial intelligence / Artificial Intelligence (AI). The purpose of this study is to analyze the legality of credit agreements with fiduciary guarantees made with Artificial Intelligence (AI). The type of research used is empirical legal research, supported by primary and secondary data. The results of the research are that Smart contract is a computer program that can make agreements automatically with the blockchain system.AI is generally viewed as a legal object, not a legal subject. This is because AI is a tool or device used by humans to achieve certain goals. The requirements for the validity of an agreement (including a credit agreement with fiduciary guarantee) remain based on Article 1320 of the Civil Code.
ISLAMIC LAW REVIEW ON INTER-RELIGIOUS MARRIAGES IN INDONESIA BASED ON LEGAL BENEFITS Notonegoro, Muhammad Hadi; Rinda Listyawati, Peni
Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah Vol 19, No 3 (2024): September 2024
Publisher : UNISSULA Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jhku.v19i3.43144

Abstract

This study aims to determine and analyze the regulation of interfaith marriage in Indonesia, to determine and analyze that interfaith marriage can be implemented in Indonesia, and to determine and analyze the impact of interfaith marriage in Indonesia. Based on the study, it was concluded that the regulation of interfaith marriage in Indonesia is not regulated by law, but the prohibition of interfaith marriage in Indonesia can be understood in the provisions of Article 2 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law and Article 10 paragraph (2) of Government Regulation No. 9 of 1975, SEMA Number. 2 of 2023, Article 8 letter f of the Marriage Law Number. 1 of 1974 and Article 44 of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). Interfaith marriage cannot be implemented in Indonesia, because according to Islam, Protestant Christianity, Catholicism, Hinduism, and Buddhism, marriage must be based on government regulations, for Islam it must go through the Religious Affairs Office (KUA) one of the requirements is that it must not be of different religions, then other religions indicate that marriages must be registered at the Civil Registry Office, and must not be of different religions. The impact of interfaith marriages in Indonesia is that if administratively interfaith marriages are considered invalid according to the law and the marriage is not recognized, so that when the registration of the marriage at the civil registry office is rejected, children from interfaith marriages often experience a dilemma in determining their religious beliefs because each parent will put pressure on their children to embrace their own religion.
Legal Uncertainty in Law Enforcement for Drug Addicts Resulting in Criminal Disparity Winjaya Laksana, Andri; Budi Susilo, Adhi; Rinda Listyawati, Peni; Widiyoko, Setiawan; Triyanto, Toni
Yuridika Vol. 40 No. 2 (2025): Volume 40 No 2 May 2025
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v40i2.68153

Abstract

The application of Articles in law enforcement against drug addicts that should be imposed on dealers, dealers or couriers, but instead imposed on addicts, causes legal uncertainty for addicts because the rights of addicts to be rehabilitated are not obtained. This paper uses normative legal research methods. The research approach used is a statutory approach and a case study approach. The results of this study are legal uncertainty in law enforcement against drug addicts in Indonesia, which is caused by multiple interpretations between Article 127 and Article 112 of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, which has created disparities in sentencing that ignore the principle of justice. The use of Article 112 which should be intended for drug dealers is often misused to ensnare addicts, who should receive rehabilitation according to Article 127. The need for legal reconstruction that focuses on harmonizing Article 127 and Article 112 of the Narcotics Law to align the two articles, by providing quantitative limitations and clear criteria to distinguish abusers from dealers.
The Land Acquisition Policy Analysis for Development in the Public Interest on The Construction of the Semarang-Demak Toll Road Kusriyah, Sri; Rinda Listyawati, Peni; Ma'ruf, Umar
Sultan Agung Notary Law Review Vol 7, No 2 (2025): June 2025
Publisher : Program Studi Master of Notary Law (S2), Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam SUltan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/sanlar.7.2.107-124

Abstract

National development is a series of continuous development efforts that cover all aspects of community life, nation and state, to carry out the task of realizing national goals. The implementation of development must be adjusted to spatial planning as an effort made in the context of meeting current needs without reducing the ability of future generations to meet their needs. Land is a national wealth needed by humans both individually, business entities and governments in order to realize national development. This paper is to find out how the land acquisition planning policy is for development in the public interest related to the construction of the Semarang-Demak toll road in Demak Regency, to find out how the procedure for implementing land acquisition in Demak Regency. The writing method uses a normative legal approach method, secondary data as the main data, primary data as supporting data, then analyzed with public policy theory and justice theory. The results of the study show that the Semarang-Demak toll road development policy is in accordance with the Demak Regency Spatial Planning policy in Regional Regulation No. Perda No. 1 of 2020. Concerning Amendments to Regional Regulation No. 6 of 2011 concerning the Demak Regency Spatial Planning Plan for 2011-2031. This conformity is very important because the local government understands the most about land use. The compensation procedure for land acquisition for the Semarang-Demak toll road applies the principles of justice, humanity and protection of human rights through deliberation, so that people who relinquish their land control rights sincerely relinquish their land rights. as regulated by Law No. 2 of 2012 concerning Land Acquisition for Development in the Public Interest.
A Comparative Study of the Regulation of Liability for Criminal Acts of Child Bullying Perpetrators Causing the Victim's Death According to Islamic Criminal Law and Positive Criminal Law in Indonesia Rahmatika. HB, Ghina; Rinda Listyawati, Peni
Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah Vol 20, No 3 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : UNISSULA Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jhku.v20i3.48149

Abstract

Bullying is a form of violence that causes serious physical and psychological effects and has become a global problem, including in Indonesia. Although often considered trivial, bullying often has traumatic effects and can even cause the death of victims, as in the case in South Kalimantan. The contributing factors include economic differences, gender, seniority, and the perpetrator's desire for social influence. Legally, child perpetrators receive special treatment under the Child Protection Act and the Child Criminal Justice System Act (UU SPPA), which emphasizes restorative justice and diversion. However, in cases resulting in death, there is a dilemma between the need for justice for the victim and protection for the perpetrator, who is still a child. In Islamic criminal law, bullying is classified as a crime and may be subject to qisas punishment if it causes death, or ta'zir if it causes injury or psychological trauma. However, children who have not reached puberty are not subject to qisas punishment, but rather rehabilitation, and responsibility can be transferred to a guardian. The objectives of this study are: 1) to determine how the criminal responsibility of child perpetrators of bullying that results in the death of the victim is regulated under Islamic criminal law; 2) To determine how the criminal responsibility of children who commit bullying that results in the death of the victim is regulated in the perspective of positive criminal law in Indonesia, 3) To determine the similarities and differences regarding the regulation of criminal responsibility for children who commit bullying that results in the death of the victim between Islamic criminal law and positive criminal law in Indonesia. The research method used in this study is normative legal research, with a descriptive-comparative research specification. The data collection method used is library research, while the data analysis method used in this study is descriptive analysis. The research results show that the criminal liability of children who commit bullying that results in the death of the victim according to Islamic law is that children who have not reached puberty are not subject to severe criminal punishment but may be subject to ta'zir sanctions to educate and prevent repetition of the act. Liability is also transferred civilly to the child's guardian in the form of diyat payment to the victim's family. According to positive criminal law in Indonesia, actions by children that result in the victim's death are still being processed legally, but with a proportional and educational approach. There are fundamental similarities and differences. Both agree that children cannot be treated like adults and prioritize the protection, education, and guidance of children through a restorative and educational approach. However, there are similarities and differences. Both agree that children cannot be treated like adults and prioritize the protection, education, and guidance of children through a restorative and educational approach. However, there are differences in the age of criminal responsibility, types of punishment, case handling systems, and legal sources. Islamic law emphasizes maturity based on puberty and recognises diyat as a form of accountability, while positive law uses an age limit of 12–18 years and does not recognize diyat, but rather criminal penalties or corrective measures.