Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Integrasi Keamanan Basis Data berbantuan AI Untuk Mendukung Keamanan Siber Zen Munawar; Sri Sutjiningtyas; Novianti Indah Putri; Angling Sugiatna; Rita Komalasari; Herru Soerjono
TEMATIK Vol. 13 No. 1 (2026): Tematik : Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Komunikasi (e-Journal) - Juni 2026
Publisher : LPPM POLITEKNIK LP3I BANDUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38204/tematik.v13i1.3064

Perkembangan teknologi digital telah meningkatkan kompleksitas ancaman siber, menjadikan keamanan basis data sebagai prioritas utama bagi organisasi. Metode tradisional sering kali tidak mampu menghadapi serangan canggih, sehingga diperlukan pendekatan baru berbasis kecerdasan buatan (AI). Penelitian ini bertujuan mengeksplorasi bagaimana integrasi AI dapat merevolusi strategi keamanan basis data melalui deteksi ancaman, respons insiden otomatis, enkripsi adaptif, dan pengendalian akses cerdas. Metode yang digunakan berupa kajian literatur dan analisis konseptual terhadap penerapan algoritma machine learning, predictive analytics, deteksi anomali, serta integrasi dengan intelijen ancaman global. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa AI mampu mendeteksi pola serangan baru, termasuk zero-day vulnerabilities, secara real-time, mempercepat respons insiden melalui otomatisasi playbook dan orkestrasi sistem, serta mengurangi kesalahan manusia. Dalam perlindungan data, AI memungkinkan enkripsi dinamis sesuai sensitivitas informasi dan autentikasi adaptif berbasis konteks. Integrasi dengan intelijen ancaman global memperkuat kemampuan AI memperbarui algoritma sesuai tren serangan terbaru. Kesimpulannya, penerapan AI tidak hanya meningkatkan ketahanan organisasi terhadap ancaman siber, tetapi juga mendorong transformasi dari pendekatan reaktif menuju proaktif, membentuk kerangka kerja keamanan yang efisien, adaptif, dan berkelanjutan.

Contribution Margin Discipline in Digital Promotions for MSMEs Angling Sugiatna; Ijang Faisal
Journal of Jabar Economic Society Networking Forum Vol. 3 No. 10 (2026): JESOCIN - October
Publisher : Organisasi Masyarakat Kreatif Indonesia Emas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Digital promotions can increase recorded sales while reducing the cash available to finance operations. This conceptual article develops an evaluation framework that separates order contribution, campaign expenditure, incremental demand, and settlement timing. The proposed unit of analysis is a campaign cohort with traceable orders, returns, variable costs, and customer follow-up. Selected institutional sources provide contextual foundations; the framework itself is developed through analytical reasoning and hypothetical illustrations. It is neither a systematic review nor an empirical investigation. The analysis shows why positive order margins may coexist with a campaign deficit, why contribution differs from cash availability, and why repeat-purchase assumptions require comparable observation windows. Three propositions connect contribution information to campaign selection, cash-based spending limits to liquidity exposure, and customer-cohort evidence to acquisition-cost evaluation. Operational definitions, a reconciliation worksheet, sensitivity checks, and a prospective research design are proposed. The contribution is a testable decision architecture, rather than an estimate of profitability improvement. Application in West Java requires transaction-level validation and explicit treatment of attribution, incomplete returns, shared costs, and the opportunity cost of restricted marketing experimentation.

Decision-Rationale Transparency in Cooperative Conflict-of-Interest Management Adang Haryaman; Angling Sugiatna
Journal of Jabar Economic Society Networking Forum Vol. 3 No. 10 (2026): JESOCIN - October
Publisher : Organisasi Masyarakat Kreatif Indonesia Emas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Disclosing a personal relationship does not by itself show how a cooperative protected the quality of a related decision. This conceptual article develops decision-rationale transparency as a link between interest disclosure and meaningful member oversight. The proposed framework distinguishes relevant interests, participation restrictions, comparison of alternatives, documented reasoning, and proportionate access to supporting evidence. Corporate-governance principles are used analogically, with explicit recognition that cooperative ownership and institutional arrangements differ. Selected data-governance literature informs access boundaries. No field investigation, legal compliance assessment, or empirical effectiveness estimate is reported. A hypothetical procurement case illustrates how a relationship can be disclosed while the rationale for supplier selection remains unexamined. Three propositions concern member evaluation, perceived procedural fairness, and the interaction between traceability and readability. The article proposes a decision record, a tiered-access design, and vignette and field-study measures. Its contribution is a testable distinction between relationship transparency, process transparency, and evidence transparency. Application requires adaptation to the cooperative's governing arrangements and legitimate information rights. The framework is intended as a managerial research proposal, not as a legal procedure or an allegation concerning any organisation or person.

Contribution Margin Discipline in Digital Promotions for MSMEs Angling Sugiatna; Ijang Faisal
Journal of Jabar Economic Society Networking Forum Vol. 3 No. 10 (2026): JESOCIN - October
Publisher : Organisasi Masyarakat Kreatif Indonesia Emas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Digital promotions can increase recorded sales while reducing the cash available to finance operations. This conceptual article develops an evaluation framework that separates order contribution, campaign expenditure, incremental demand, and settlement timing. The proposed unit of analysis is a campaign cohort with traceable orders, returns, variable costs, and customer follow-up. Selected institutional sources provide contextual foundations; the framework itself is developed through analytical reasoning and hypothetical illustrations. It is neither a systematic review nor an empirical investigation. The analysis shows why positive order margins may coexist with a campaign deficit, why contribution differs from cash availability, and why repeat-purchase assumptions require comparable observation windows. Three propositions connect contribution information to campaign selection, cash-based spending limits to liquidity exposure, and customer-cohort evidence to acquisition-cost evaluation. Operational definitions, a reconciliation worksheet, sensitivity checks, and a prospective research design are proposed. The contribution is a testable decision architecture, rather than an estimate of profitability improvement. Application in West Java requires transaction-level validation and explicit treatment of attribution, incomplete returns, shared costs, and the opportunity cost of restricted marketing experimentation.

Decision-Rationale Transparency in Cooperative Conflict-of-Interest Management Adang Haryaman; Angling Sugiatna
Journal of Jabar Economic Society Networking Forum Vol. 3 No. 10 (2026): JESOCIN - October
Publisher : Organisasi Masyarakat Kreatif Indonesia Emas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Disclosing a personal relationship does not by itself show how a cooperative protected the quality of a related decision. This conceptual article develops decision-rationale transparency as a link between interest disclosure and meaningful member oversight. The proposed framework distinguishes relevant interests, participation restrictions, comparison of alternatives, documented reasoning, and proportionate access to supporting evidence. Corporate-governance principles are used analogically, with explicit recognition that cooperative ownership and institutional arrangements differ. Selected data-governance literature informs access boundaries. No field investigation, legal compliance assessment, or empirical effectiveness estimate is reported. A hypothetical procurement case illustrates how a relationship can be disclosed while the rationale for supplier selection remains unexamined. Three propositions concern member evaluation, perceived procedural fairness, and the interaction between traceability and readability. The article proposes a decision record, a tiered-access design, and vignette and field-study measures. Its contribution is a testable distinction between relationship transparency, process transparency, and evidence transparency. Application requires adaptation to the cooperative's governing arrangements and legitimate information rights. The framework is intended as a managerial research proposal, not as a legal procedure or an allegation concerning any organisation or person.

Title

Found 5 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 5 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 5 Documents
Search