Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

QCA Analysis of Factors Contributing to Poor Policing Activities In Mining And Quarrying In Indonesia Bhakti Suhendarwan; Akhmad Fauzi; Sri Mulatsih; Bambang Juanda
Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Journal Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies
Publisher : Green Publisher Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59188/eduvest.v5i1.50246

Abstract

The paradox of natural resource management is the finding that is the basis for this study. The paradox shows that areas that depend on natural resource management, such as mining and quarrying, have lower scores in supervision, partnerships, and law enforcement scores than areas with no income from mining and quarrying activities. The Qualitative, quantitative comparative analysis (QCA) method is used to find the pathway that causes the paradox in each research area; QCA will provide a general pathway as to why an area has different characteristics from other regions even though they have identical scores and indicators in statistical measurements. As the result, The qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) shows that regional areas with a high composite index score have certain pathway characteristics, such as the high integrity of public employees and the low level of corrupt behavior in the area.
Organizational Transformation in Hybrid Contexts: Integrating Ambidexterity and Dynamic Capabilities – A Systematic Literature Review Kurniana Kurniana; Bambang Juanda; Anny Ratnawati; Zenal Asikin
Greenation International Journal of Economics and Accounting Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Greenation International Journal of Economics and Accounting (July - August 202
Publisher : Greenation Research & Yayasan Global Resarch National

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/gijea.v4i3.1155

Abstract

This study aims to examine and integrate the perspectives of ambidexterity and dynamic capabilities in explaining organizational transformation, particularly within hybrid organizational contexts. Although both perspectives have been widely applied in strategic management literature, prior studies tend to treat them separately, resulting in a limited understanding of the mechanisms underlying organizational transformation. This study employs a systematic literature review approach following the PRISMA protocol. Data were collected from Scopus and Web of Science databases, focusing on peer-reviewed journal articles published between 2010 and 2025. The selection process involved identification, screening, eligibility assessment, and inclusion stages to ensure the quality and relevance of the selected studies. The findings indicate that ambidexterity plays a critical role in balancing exploration and exploitation, while dynamic capabilities function as key mechanisms through sensing, seizing, and transforming processes. The integration of these perspectives provides a more comprehensive framework for understanding how organizations achieve sustained transformation, particularly in managing the complexity of institutional logics within hybrid contexts. This study contributes to the literature by developing an integrated conceptual framework linking ambidexterity and dynamic capabilities in organizational transformation. It also identifies key research gaps and proposes a future research agenda, particularly in the context of hybrid organizations and dynamic institutional environments.