Syarief Hidayatullah
Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Perbandingan Sistem Pemilu Di Negara-Negara Barat: Analisis Model, Keunggulan Dan Kelemahan Gilvina Grace B. A.; Syarief Hidayatullah
J-CEKI : Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah Vol. 4 No. 1: Desember 2024
Publisher : CV. ULIL ALBAB CORP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/jceki.v4i1.6515

Abstract

Studi ini membandingkan sistem pemilihan umum (pemilu) berbagai yang diterapkan di negara-negara Barat, dengan tujuan menganalisis model pemilu, keunggulan dan kelemahannya. Dengan fokus pada sistem mayoritarian, proporsional, dan campuran. Sistem mayoritarian yang diterapkan di Amerika dan Inggris memberikan stabilitas politik serta hubungan yang kuat antara pemilih dan wakilnya, namun berpotensi mengabaikan kepentingan kelompok minoritas. Di sisi lain, sistem proporsional yang diterapkan di Prancis menawarkan representasi yang lebih adil dan mencerminkan keragaman suara masyarakat, meskipun dapat menyebabkan fragmentasi politik dan koalisi yang rapuh. Sistem campuran, yang menggabungkan elemen-elemen dari kedua sistem tersebut, berusaha memadukan keunggulan masing-masing, namun menghadapi tantangan dalam penerapannya. Temuan dari studi ini menunjukkan bahwa tidak ada sistem yang sepenuhnya sempurna; pemilihan sistem elektoral yang paling sesuai sangat bergantung pada konteks sosial-politik dan kebutuhan spesifik masing-masing negara.
Juridical Analysis of Violation of Core-Plasma Partnership Agreement of Palm Oil Plantation Between PT Hardaya Inti Plantation and Plasma Amanah Farmers Cooperative (Case Study of KPPU Decision No. 02/KPPU-K/2023) Syarief Hidayatullah; Surahman Surahman; Muhammad Nurcholis Alhadi; Elviandri Elviandri
LITERACY : International Scientific Journals of Social, Education, Humanities Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): April : International Scientific Journals of Social, Education, Humanities
Publisher : Badan Penerbit STIEPARI Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56910/literacy.v4i1.1999

Abstract

The inti-plasma partnership scheme in the oil palm plantation sector aims to create a mutually beneficial relationship between large companies (nucleus) and smallholders (plasma). However, in practice, there are often inequalities that cause plasma farmers to lose control over their businesses. This research analyzes the violation of the partnership agreement between PT Hardaya Inti Plantations (PT HIP) and Koperasi Tani Plasma Amanah as decided in KPPU Decision No. 02/KPPU-K/2023. The focus of the analysis includes the forms of juridical, financial, and operational control that PT HIP exercised over the cooperative, as well as the legal implications based on Jeremy Bentham's theories of civil law, competition, and justice. The results show that PT HIP has abused its dominant position by fully controlling the partnership agreement, limiting cooperatives' access to decision-making, and implementing non-transparent financial practices. KPPU has imposed administrative sanctions in the form of an agreement addendum obligation, an independent audit, and a fine of Rp1,000,000,000.00. However, an evaluation of this decision indicates that the sanction has not fully provided substantive justice for plasma farmers, given the absence of a direct compensation mechanism. Therefore, there is a need to strengthen regulations and implement more effective monitoring and law enforcement mechanisms to ensure fairer and more sustainable partnership relationships in the oil palm plantation industry in Indonesia.