Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 10 Documents
Search

URGENSI PEMBENTUKAN PENGADILAN KHUSUS EKONOMI SYARIAH DALAM LINGKUNGAN PERADILAN AGAMA Saut Maruli Tua Manik
JOURNAL EQUITABLE Vol 6 No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37859/jeq.v6i1.2640

Abstract

The importance of a special sharia economic court in the Religious Courts is reviewed philosophically, sociologically, juridically. Philosophically it is based on Pancasila as the state philosophy. The sociological basis of the sharia economics special court answers problems and fulfills the needs of Islamic religious law in the field of sharia economics on the basis of empirical facts of sharia economic dispute resolution, juridically based on Article 3A of Law Number 3 of 2006, and Article 3A paragraphs (1), (3) and 13B paragraph (1) of Law Number 50 of 2009 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 7 of 1989 concerning the Religious Courts. Problem: What are the efforts and obstacles that the Supreme Court does to improve the quality of sharia economic dispute resolution in the Indonesian Religious courts. Normative methodology with a normative juridical approach. Data sources are primary data and supported secondary data
PEMAHAMAN HUKUM ADMINISTRASI PERTANAHAN BAGI MASYARAKAT DESA SANGLAR KABUPATEN INDRAGIRI HILIR GUNA MENCEGAH KONFLIK DAN SENGKETA PERTANAHAN Aksar, Aksar; Tua Manik, Saut Maruli; Dinata, Umar
Mimbar Keadilan Vol 15 No 1 (2022): Februari 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/mk.v15i1.5844

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the factors that influence the legal understanding of village communities in certifying their land rights to prevent conflicts and land disputes in rural areas. This research is socio-legal research. Socio-legal research is research that combines normative and empirical methods in its research. The results of this study The legal understanding of the Village community in making land title certificates as well as knowledge about the importance of ownership of land rights certificates is still relatively low, in general, the people who are used as informants do not know about the procedures for making land title certificates. The conclusions in this study confirm that the land is a very basic human need so legal understanding of the community is very urgent to be carried out in managing land certificates, in order to avoid disputes and cases of land grabbing in the community. If viewed from the economic aspect, land certificates can be used by the community to obtain business capital. So that people can improve their standard of living and welfare.
Settlement of Syariah Economic Dispute through the Special Court of Syariah Economic in the Religious Courts Saut Maruli Tua Manik; Yaswirman Yaswirman; Busra Azheri; Ikhwan Ikhwan
AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Vol 17, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ajis.v17i2.6082

Abstract

The research focused on the importance of the establishment of special courts within the Religious Courts in the settlement of sharia economic disputes, and the legal construction of the establishment of a special syariah economic court within the Religious Courts. The results of research: First,the establishment of a special syariah economic court within the Religious Courts can achieve efficiency and professional realization so that the belief of sharia economic community towards the Religious Courts is realized. Second,the construction of the special law court of Islamic law within the Religious Courts is the 1945 Constitution and Law Number 48 Year 2009 on Judicial Power, and the position within the Religious Courts under the Supreme Courtin accordance with Law No. 3 of 2006 on Amendment to Law Number 7 of 1989 concerning Religious Courts jo Law Number 50 Year 2009 concerning Second Amendment to Law Number 7 Year 1989 on Religious Courts. DOI: 10.15408/ajis.v17i2.6082
Legal Construction for the Establishment of Sharia Economic Special Courts in Religious Courts in Indonesia Saut Maruli Tua Manik
Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Vol 4, No 3 (2021): Budapest International Research and Critics Institute August
Publisher : Budapest International Research and Critics University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/birci.v4i3.2477

Abstract

The urgency of establishing a special sharia economic court within the Religious Courts is due to the dualism of sharia economic dispute settlement institutions that still continues due to the harmonization of laws and regulations related to sharia economics has not been carried out. The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal construction of the establishment of a special sharia economic court in the religious courts in Indonesia, and the important factors in the establishment of a special sharia economic court in the religious courts in Indonesia. The normative method is used in research with a normative juridical approach. The results of the study are the legal construction of the establishment of a special sharia economic court placed within the Religious Courts and culminating in the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. The establishment of a special sharia economic court is constitutionally based on Article 24 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution, the provisions of Article 1 paragraph 8 and Article 27 paragraph (1), paragraph (2) of Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power and Article 3A of the Law Number 3 of 2006, affirmed Article 3A paragraphs (1), (3) and 13B paragraph (1) of Law Number 50 of 2009 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 7 of 1989 as the legal basis.
Tinjauan yuridis penerapan asas tinjauan yuridis penerapan asas cepat sederhana dan biaya ringan bagi hakim dalam memutus sengketa tata usaha negaran di pengadilan tata usaha negara pekanbaru: Application of Simple Fast Asasa Low Cost for Judges in deciding Disputes, Pekanbaru State Administrative Court Susi Atdriani; Saut Maruli Tua Manik
JURNAL RISET INDRAGIRI Vol 2 No 2 (2023): Juli
Publisher : Lembaga Marwah Rakyat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Indonesia is a state of law, so the existence of the judiciary is very important because it functions as the last bastion of law enforcement within the country. Therefore, in the constitution of the state of Indonesia as stated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia in Article 24 paragraph (2) it is stated that judicial power is exercised by a Supreme Court and judicial bodies under it within the General Court environment, the Religious Court environment, the Military Court, State Administrative Court environment, and by a Constitutional Court. State Administrative Court (hereinafter referred to as Administrative Court) is a court within the scope of public law, which has the duty and authority to "examine, decide and resolve state administration disputes, namely a dispute that arises in the field of state administration law between persons or civil legal entities (community members) with TUN Bodies or Officials (government) both at the central and regional levels. As a result of the issuance of a TUN Decree (beschikking), including employment disputes based on applicable laws and regulations" (Article 50 Jo. Article 1 point 4 of the Administrative Court Law). This study aims to find out the juridical analysis of the application of the simple fast principle and low cost for judges in deciding state administrative disputes at the Pekanbaru state administrative court that has been implemented, to find out the obstacles found in the application of the simple fast principle and low cost as well as how judges try to Realizing the Principle of Fast, Simple and Low Cost for Judges at the Pekanbaru State Administrative Court. The type of research used is normative legal research method. The results of this study indicate that in general the application of the principle of simple fast and low cost has not been implemented optimally based on the State Administrative Court Procedure Law. There are still cases that have been resolved for more than 5 (five) months due to SEMA No. 2 of 2014 is a rule that was just promulgated on March 13, 2014. Therefore, in its implementation, the Pekanbaru State Administrative Court did not immediately run effectively. Because the rule of law generally requires adjustments for some time in order to run effectively. This can be seen from the percentage of cases that were resolved for more than 5 months by judges in 24 cases from 2021 to 2022.
Prinsip Restorative Justice Dengan Keseimbangan Orientasi Pada Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Umar Dinata; Aksar; Saut Maruli Tua Manik
UIR Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): UIR Law Review
Publisher : UIR Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25299/uirlrev.2022.vol6(2).11865

Abstract

Settlement of criminal cases with a restorative approach has begun to be applied in Indonesia, but its implementation is only related to the settlement of juvenile criminal cases. In practice, a restorative justice approach is often applied to pay more attention to the perpetrators of crimes than to the victims of these crimes. Thus the reconstruction of the principles of restorative justice is currently not fully implemented. Investigators pay more attention to the interests of the perpetrator rather than the interests of the victim. Often victims feel dissatisfied or feel compelled to accept the decision. This was done by involving community leaders and traditional leaders, but the implementation still impressed the perpetrators and impressed that in the process the victims were forced to agree to the agreements that were made. The principle of restorative justice is known as a traditional case settlement model. The case settlement model with a restorative justice principle approach which is designed to resolve criminal cases in the context of modern criminal law, should be processed within the criminal justice system. Indonesia, and the Ministry of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia have adopted the principle of restorative justice as a way of settling a criminal case so that conceptually it can produce provisions based on restorative justice.
REKONTRUKSI PRINSIP RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM PENYELESAIAN TINDAK PIDANA ANAK Aksar; Umar Dinata; Saut Maruli Tua Manik
JOURNAL EQUITABLE Vol 8 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : LPPM, Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37859/jeq.v8i2.4949

Abstract

Restorative Justice according to Article 1 number 6 of Law Number 11 of 2012 is the settlement of criminal cases involving perpetrators, victims, families of perpetrators/victims, and other related parties to jointly seek a fair settlement by emphasizing recovery. return to its original state, and not retaliation. The concept of restorative justice is a critique of the concept of the criminal justice system which sees crime as a violation of state rules. As for the results of this study, namely the reconstruction of restorative justice policies in cases of children as perpetrators of crimes, according to Erna Sofwan Syukri, it provides an understanding of punishment as an effort to awaken the perpetrators of crimes so that they regret their actions, and return them to become good, law-abiding citizens. upholding moral, social and religious values, so as to achieve a safe, orderly and peaceful society. So the reconstruction of Restorative Justice in the case of children as perpetrators of criminal acts must be fair. The value of justice is a balance between rights and obligations and receiving rights and carrying out obligations.
INDIKASI GEOGRAFIS DAN PENINGKATAN EKONOMI BERKELANJUTAN DALAM KASUS KOPI LIBERIKA MERANTI RAIHANA; RAHMAN IRNANDA Z, ALIF; MARULITUA MANIK, SAUT; YUNARTI, RAHMI
ANDREW Law Journal Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): JUNI 2024
Publisher : ANDREW Law Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61876/alj.v3i1.24

Abstract

Kopi yang berasal dari Kabupaten Kepulauan Meranti telah didaftarkan sebagai produk Indikasi Geografis oleh Masyarakat Peduli Kopi Liberika Rangsang Meranti (MPKLRM) dengan nama Kopi Liberika Meranti. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum empiris. Kopi Liberika Meranti dilindungi secara hukum oleh Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis. Dalam pelaksanaannya, Pemerintah Kabupaten Kepulauan Meranti belum optimal melakukan pembinaan, sosialiasi, dan juga pengawasan terhadap para petani kopi di Kecamatan Rangsang Kabupaten Kepulauan Meranti sehingga berdampak dalam peningkatan ekonomi berkelanjutan. Belum adanya Peraturan Daerah, minimnya perhatian dari Pemerintah Kabupaten Kepulauan Meranti, rendahnya kesadaran hukum masyarakat, kurangnya infrastruktur pendukung, dan minimnya informasi pemasaran domestik merupakan kendala yang terjadi dalam kasus Kopi Liberika Meranti di Kabupaten Kepulauan Meranti.
Efforts to Improve the Quality of Handling Sharia Economic Disputes by Indonesian Religious Courts Saut Maruli Tua Manik; Raihana; Yuniarti, Rahmi; Santoso , Mulia Akbar; Wilianli Melati Jaya Putri; Dhea Rahman Putri
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 002 (2024): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.5509

Abstract

The development of religious courts to address Sharia economic cases in Indonesia is considered a historic moment by many parties. However, efforts to improve the quality of resolving Sharia economic issues in religious courts have become increasingly important. This aims to enhance the trust of legal seekers, especially in Sharia economic disputes, towards dispute resolution through the alternative path faced through religious courts. The research was conducted using normative research methods and the analysis used was qualitative. The results show that religious courts in Indonesia have absolute jurisdiction in handling Sharia economic cases. Although the number of cases is increasing, the expansion of this authority challenges all elements of religious courts, including employees and judges. Despite the efforts of guidance carried out by the Supreme Court (Mahkamah Agung) in this case implemented by the Directorate General of Religious Courts, there are still several obstacles, such as the lack of harmony in laws related to Sharia economic matters. Then there are other factors influencing the quality of problem handling, namely the dualism of judicial institutions, namely Religious Courts as well as General Courts. The dualism of dispute resolution after the issuance of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 93/PUU-X/2012 remains a barrier, so the public has not fully been able to trust religious courts in the context of handling Sharia economic problems. Submission to the Consumer Dispute Settlement Board (BPSK) and agreements in contracts to use General Courts as a forum for resolving Sharia economic disputes reflect distrust in religious courts. Therefore, concrete steps are needed to overcome these barriers and increase public trust in religious courts to resolve Sharia economic problems.
Urgensi Klausul Force Majueure dalam Drafting Kontrak Bisnis Pasca Pandemi COVID-19 Manik, Saut Maruli Tua; Nursy, Ihsan; Amidah, Sepdillah Putri; Nurhaliza, Siti; Aziz, Muhammad Abdul; Febrianti, Aulia Puspita; Azzahra, Faradilla; Adrianan, Meiriko
SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 4 No. 11 (2025): SENTRI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, November 2025
Publisher : LPPM Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/sentri.v4i11.4875

Abstract

Pandemi COVID-19 telah memberikan dampak signifikan terhadap kelangsungan pelaksanaan kontrak bisnis di berbagai sektor. Banyak kontrak yang terganggu akibat pembatasan aktivitas, gangguan rantai pasok, dan kebijakan pemerintah, sehingga menimbulkan perdebatan hukum terkait penerapan klausul force majeure. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis urgensi pencantuman klausul force majeure dalam kontrak bisnis pasca pandemi serta mengkaji tantangan dan model perumusannya. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan komparatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa banyak kontrak sebelum pandemi tidak secara eksplisit mencantumkan peristiwa pandemi sebagai force majeure, sehingga menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum. Klausul force majeure sebaiknya dirumuskan secara rinci dan kontekstual, termasuk prosedur pemberitahuan dan dampaknya terhadap kewajiban kontraktual. Selain itu, konsep hardship perlu dipertimbangkan sebagai pelengkap force majeure untuk mengakomodasi kondisi yang secara signifikan memberatkan pelaksanaan kontrak tanpa sepenuhnya menghalanginya. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan pentingnya pembaruan praktik drafting kontrak bisnis di Indonesia dengan mencantumkan klausul force majeure dan hardship secara eksplisit guna menjamin kepastian hukum dan keadilan bagi para pihak di tengah situasi yang tidak terduga.