Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Layanan Pembiayaan Berbasis Teknologi Informasi Di BPRS Berdasarkan Prinsip Syariah Tina, Dewi Agus; Zulaikha, Siti; Putri, Marisa
ASAS Vol. 14 No. 01 (2022): Asas, Vol. 14, No. 01 Juli 2022
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/asas.v14i01.13144

Abstract

In Islamic finance, according to fiqh, interest in money is categorized as usury which means haram. The development of Islamic banking is quite rapidly spreading by providing banking services in accordance with the principles of Islamic sharia. The Sharia People's Financing Bank (BPRS) is the only BPR that operates with sharia principles in the city of Bandar Lampung. Technology-based financing on the system peer to peer (P2P) lending whose provisions refer to the DSN Fatwa concerning Technology-Based Financing Services Based on Sharia Principles. The problem in this study is how the implementation of information technology-based Murabahah contract financing services based on sharia principles at PT. BPRS Bandar Lampung? Is information technology-based financing services based on sharia principles at BPRS Bandar Lampung in accordance with DSN-MUI Fatwa No. 117/DSN-MUI/II/2018? The purpose of this study was to determine the implementation of information technology-based Murabahah contract financing services based on sharia principles at PT. BPRS Bandar Lampung. Then in the implementation of financing, it aims to find out that information technology-based financing services based on sharia principles at BPRS Bandar Lampung are in accordance with DSN-MUI Fatwa No. 117/DSN-MUI/II/2018. This study uses a descriptive-qualitative method with a normative-empirical approach based on a literature study by looking at the written regulations by identifying the appropriate theories, concepts, and sharia principles. The data used in this study are primary and secondary data. Sharia principles must be met in information technology-based financing service products based on sharia principles. Based on general guidelines on information technology-based financing service products based on sharia principles that exist at PT. BPRS Bandar Lampung is in accordance with the fatwa. Kata Kunci: The Sharia People's Financing Bank (BPRS), Technology-based financing, system peer to peer (P2P)
Tinjauan Fikih Empat Mazhab Terhadap Operasi Caesar Pasca Kematian Ibu Hamil Putri, Marisa; Gandhi Liyorba Indra
El-Izdiwaj: Indonesian Journal of Civil and Islamic Family Law Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Juni 2025
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Keluarga Islam Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/et21ef17

Abstract

Abstrak: Tulisan ini bertujuan menjelaskan tentang pendapat empat imam mazhab mengenai operasi caesar pada wanita hamil yang meninggal dunia. Penelitian ini tergolong penelitian kepustakaan. Data utama pada penelitian ini adalalah data sekunder dari al-Qur’an, Hadis, dan kitab Rahmatul Umah Fi Ikhtilafi Aimmah, serta literatur terkait yang relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pendapat empat imam mazhab berbeda pendapat mengenai bedah pada wanita hamil yang meninggil dunia. Ada yang membolehkan dan ada yang tidak membolehkan masing-masing mempunyai dasar hukum yang menjadi alasan perbedaan pendapat dikalangan empat Imam. (1) Terdapat persamaan dan perbedaan dikalangan Imam Abu Hanifah, Malik, Syafi’i dam Imam Ahmad bin Hambal, dimana Imam Abu Hanifah dan Syafi’i boleh membedah perutnya untuk menyelamtkan bayinya. (2) Imam Malik memiliki dua perdapat yaitu suatu saat boleh dan suatu saat tidak tergatung pada konteksnya (Illat-nya), dan Ahmad bin Hambal melarang membedah perutnya melarang untuk melakukan pembedahan mayat karena melakukan pembedahan pada mayit sama saja menyakiti mayit tersebut, sedangkan menyakiti mayit sama seperti menyakiti ketika dia hidup. Kata Kunci: Empat Mazhab, Caesar, Wanita hamil menggil dunia.   Abstract: This paper aims to explain the opinions of four imams of the Islamic school of thought regarding caesarean section on pregnant women who die. This research is classified as library research. The main data in this study are secondary data from the Qur'an, Hadith, and the book Rahmatul Umah Fi Ikhtilafi Aimmah, as well as relevant related literature. The results of the study show that the opinions of the four imams of the Islamic school of thought differ regarding surgery on pregnant women who die. Some allow it and some do not allow it, each of which has a legal basis that is the reason for the difference of opinion among the four Imams. (1) There are similarities and differences among Imam Abu Hanifah, Malik, Syafi'i and Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal, where Imam Abu Hanifah and Syafi'i may operate on the stomach to save the baby. (2) Imam Malik has two opinions, namely that at times it is permissible and at times it is not, depending on the context (Illat), and Ahmad bin Hanbal forbade dissecting the stomach and forbade dissecting a corpse because dissecting a corpse is the same as hurting the corpse, while hurting a corpse is the same as hurting it when it was alive. Keywords: Four Mazhab, Caesar, Pregnant woman died.
The Correlation between Maternal Beliefs about Children’s Play and Children’s Play Preferences Based on Maternal Educational Background in Jember Regency Putri, Marisa; Yuli Kurniawati Sugiyo Pranoto; Liftiah Liftiah
JURNAL PENDIDIKAN USIA DINI Vol 19 No 2 (2025): Jurnal Pendidikan Usia Dini Volume 19 Number 2 November 2025
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21009/jpud.v19i2.58780

Abstract

Parental beliefs have a valuable influence on children’s play and learning experiences at home. This study aimed to analyze the correlation between maternal beliefs about children’s play, children’s play preferences, and maternal educational background as a variable that controlled both aspects. The respondents of this study were 125 mothers of children aged 5-6 years in Jember (49% boys and 51% girls). Data were analyzed using the partial correlation method to measure the correlation between these variables. The results showed that maternal beliefs had a very weak and insignificant correlation with children’s play preferences, with a correlation value of 0.073 and a significance (2-tailed) of 0.422 (p>0.05). Maternal education background had a weak but significant correlation with maternal beliefs (correlation = 0.207; significance = 0.021) (p<0.05), and maternal education background had a low and insignificant correlation with children’s play preferences (correlation = 0.076; significance = 0.401). In addition, it was found that when the maternal education background was controlled, maternal beliefs had a very weak correlation with children’s play preferences. So, the maternal education background is not a controlling variable that influences this correlation (correlation = 0.058; significance = 0.520). This finding indicates that maternal education background is not the primary variable that has a relationship in shaping maternal beliefs about children’s play and children’s play preferences in early childhood. This finding emphasizes children’s academics, even though mothers understand the value of play.
Keabsahan Hibah Mahar oleh Istri kepada Suami: Analisis Prinsip Kerelaan (‘An Tarāḍin) dan Indikasi Paksaan dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam Putri, Marisa; Restiana, Efti; Anjellika, Ega
RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Februari - April
Publisher : Prodi Bisnis Digital Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/riggs.v5i1.7797

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis keabsahan hibah mahar oleh istri kepada suami dalam perspektif hukum Islam dengan menitikberatkan pada prinsip kerelaan (ridha/’an taradin) sebagai unsur utama. Permasalahan penelitian berangkat dari ketentuan QS. An-Nisa ayat 4 yang memperbolehkan penyerahan kembali mahar oleh istri kepada suami sepanjang dilakukan secara sukarela (ṭīban nafsan). Namun, dalam praktik kehidupan rumah tangga, kerelaan sering kali sulit diukur karena adanya potensi tekanan, baik secara langsung maupun terselubung, seperti tekanan psikologis, ekonomi, maupun relasi kekuasaan antara suami dan istri. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan kepustakaan, serta pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual untuk mengkaji prinsip ridha dan ikrah dalam menentukan keabsahan hibah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hibah mahar pada dasarnya diperbolehkan dalam hukum Islam selama memenuhi rukun dan syarat hibah, yaitu adanya pemberi, penerima, objek hibah, dan ijab kabul, serta dilakukan oleh pihak yang cakap hukum. Namun demikian, keabsahan hibah tidak hanya ditentukan oleh terpenuhinya syarat formal, melainkan juga harus dilihat dari substansi kehendak istri yang benar-benar bebas dari unsur paksaan (ikrah). Jika hibah dilakukan dalam kondisi tertekan, baik secara nyata maupun terselubung, maka hibah tersebut menjadi tidak sah dan dapat dibatalkan. Dengan demikian, prinsip kerelaan menjadi indikator utama dalam menilai keabsahan hibah mahar, sehingga perlindungan terhadap hak ekonomi istri tetap terjaga dalam kerangka hukum Islam.
Pemenuhan Hak atas Pendidikan bagi Penyandang Disabilitas Berdasarkan Prinsip No One Left Behind dalam Hukum Indonesia Putri, Marisa; Margaretha, Vallent; Deananda, Andre Zanij
AHKAM Vol 5 No 4 (2026): AHKAM: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v5i4.12099

Abstract

Education is a human right that the state is obligated to guarantee and fulfill without discrimination, including for persons with disabilities. Although Indonesia has established a legal foundation through the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, the Human Rights Law, the Persons with Disabilities Law, and various implementing regulations, questions remain regarding the capacity of this legal framework to ensure that the most vulnerable groups of persons with disabilities are not left behind in accessing education. This study aimed to analyze the fulfillment of the right to education for persons with disabilities under Indonesian law by using the No One Left Behind principle as a perspective for assessing the adequacy of legal protection and affirmative measures. The study employed a normative legal research method using statutory and conceptual approaches, supported by limited factual data as contextual illustrations. The results showed that Indonesian law recognizes equal rights to education for persons with disabilities and regulates obligations to provide reasonable accommodation and affirmative measures. However, the legal framework does not explicitly regulate the classification of vulnerability levels among persons with disabilities or tiered affirmative-action mechanisms that prioritize those most vulnerable to being left behind. This condition indicates that challenges in fulfilling the right to education arise not solely from normative gaps but also from the lack of integration of the principle of prioritizing the most vulnerable groups into the design and implementation of education law and policy. This study contributes by positioning the No One Left Behind principle as an evaluative framework for assessing the fulfillment of the right to education for persons with disabilities. The implications indicate a need to strengthen vulnerability-based policies and tiered affirmative-action mechanisms so that legal protection can reach persons with disabilities more equitably and inclusively.