Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Intellektika: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa IPSSJ
Bayu Aji Adhyarsa
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Fungsi dan Kewenangan Legislasi Dewan Perwakilan Daerah (DPD) dalam Sistem Parlemen Bikameral (Dua Kamar) Negara Republik Indonesia Fandy Gultom; Iswanti Rachmanisa; Vedita Akbar; Nada Prima Dirkareshza; Bayu Aji Adhyarsa; Handoyo Prasetyo; Atik Winanti
Intellektika : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Intellektika : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa
Publisher : STIKes Ibnu Sina Ajibarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59841/intellektika.v3i1.2037

Abstract

In the process of forming a law or legislation, the DPD does not have the power to decide or play a role in the decision-making process at all. Even though there are support requirements to become a member of the DPR. This means that the quality of the legitimacy of DPD members is not at all balanced by the quality of their authority as representatives of the regional people. The aim of this research is to analyze the function and authority of the Regional Representative Council in the Structural Institution of the Republic of Indonesia State Legislative Institution and how to optimize the function and legislative authority of the Regional Representative Council. The type of research we use is normative legal research, namely research carried out by examining the body of literature or secondary data. Strengthening the authority of the DPD by consistently incorporating the Constitutional Court's decisions into statutory regulations and other regulations under it. This is being done pending the issuance of the fifth amendment to the 1945 Constitution. The current revision of the MD3 Law has not yet adopted the authority of the DPD in accordance with the Constitutional Court's decision. The need for the fifth amendment is to reorganize the function of legislation firmly and clearly in the 1945 Constitution, because by reorganizing the function of legislation it will touch all institutions, including the DPR, DPD, President and other institutions.
PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA ARBITRASE DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM INDONESIA DAN MALAYSIA Bayu Aji Adhyarsa; DIARTIKA, Handar Subhandi Bakhitar
Integrative Perspectives of Social and Science Journal Vol. 2 No. 03 Juni (2025): Integrative Perspectives of Social and Science Journal
Publisher : PT Wahana Global Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis perbandingan sistem arbitrase Indonesia dan Malaysia dalam konteks penyelesaian sengketa komersial bilateral. Intensifikasi hubungan ekonomi kedua negara yang mencapai USD 19,2 miliar pada tahun 2022 menciptakan kebutuhan mendesak akan mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa yang efektif dan dapat diprediksi. Menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perbandingan hukum, penelitian ini mengkaji framework hukum arbitrase kedua negara melalui analisis komprehensif terhadap UU No. 30/1999 Indonesia dan Arbitration Act 2005 Malaysia. Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan perbedaan fundamental dalam pendekatan filosofis, dimana Indonesia menerapkan sistem hibrida yang memadukan UNCITRAL Model Law dengan karakteristik civil law dan nilai hukum nasional, sementara Malaysia mengadopsi pendekatan adopsi langsung dengan prinsip minimal intervention. Disparitas signifikan teridentifikasi dalam konsep arbitrabilitas, persyaratan formal perjanjian arbitrase, dan mekanisme pelaksanaan putusan. Indonesia menerapkan pendekatan restriktif dengan pengawasan pengadilan intensif, sedangkan Malaysia menggunakan pendekatan liberal dengan sistem terpadu. Perbedaan kapasitas institusional antara BANI dan AIAC juga menciptakan tantangan dalam harmonisasi praktik arbitrase bilateral. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan pengembangan protokol arbitrase bilateral, pembentukan panel arbitrase bersama, dan harmonisasi kerangka hukum untuk meningkatkan efektivitas penyelesaian sengketa komersial Indonesia-Malaysia.
Co-Authors Atik Winanti DIARTIKA, Handar Subhandi Bakhitar FANDY GULTOM Handoyo Prasetyo Iswanti Rachmanisa Nada Prima Dirkareshza Vedita Akbar