Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.882
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora
Bonar Yudhistira
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Problematik Pemberian Status Justice Collaborator pada Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yulia Christy Shintara Aruan; Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih; Fauzan Fauzan; Bonar Yudhistira; Erwin Efendi Rangkuti
Mandub : Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024): Desember : Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : STAI YPIQ BAUBAU, SULAWESI TENGGARA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59059/mandub.v2i4.1846

Abstract

Granting Justice Collaborator (JC) status to perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption is one of the law enforcement strategies aimed at uncovering a wider network of corruption crimes. However, its implementation raises various problems, both in terms of law, morals and justice. This research aims to analyze the regulations underlying the granting of JC status, the criteria for its application, and the challenges that arise in practice. This study uses a juridical-normative method with an analytical approach to statutory regulations, court decisions and legal literature. The research results show that the granting of JC status is often not transparent, giving rise to controversy regarding the integrity of its implementation. Apart from that, there is a discrepancy between the ideal JC criteria as regulated in the Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) Number 4 of 2011 and the practice of granting JC status. This has an impact on public trust in the criminal justice system. For this reason, it is necessary to strengthen regulations and tighter supervision so that granting JC status is in accordance with the principles of justice, transparency and accountability.  
Problematik Pemberian Status Justice Collaborator pada Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Bonar Yudhistira; Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih; Fauzan Fauzan; Yulia Christy Shintara Aruan; Erwin Efendi Rangkuti
Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/humif.v2i1.1212

Abstract

Granting Justice Collaborator (JC) status to perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption is one of the law enforcement strategies aimed at uncovering a wider network of corruption crimes. However, its implementation raises various problems, both in terms of law, morals and justice. This research aims to analyze the regulations underlying the granting of JC status, the criteria for its application, and the challenges that arise in practice. This study uses a juridical-normative method with an analytical approach to statutory regulations, court decisions and legal literature. The research results show that the granting of JC status is often no transparent, giving rise to controversy regarding the integrity of its implementation. Apart from that, there is a discrepancy between the ideal JC criteria as regulated in the Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) Number 4 of 2011 and the practice of granting JC status. This has an impact on public trust in the criminal justice system. For this reason, it is necessary to strengthen regulations and tighter supervision so that granting JC status is in accordance with the principles of justice, transparency and accountability.
Kewenangan Bagi Jaksa untuk Melakukan Penyidikan dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Ismaidar Ismaidar; Bonar Yudhistira
Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/humif.v2i2.1504

Abstract

In handling corruption crimes, prosecutors can act as investigators and also as public prosecutors, so their role in eradicating corruption crimes by means of a penalty is very dominant, by means of a penalty meaning eradication of criminal acts by using criminal law in handling them. Until now, there are still many corruption cases whose investigations are carried out by prosecutors. However, there are different opinions regarding whether prosecutors have the actual authority as investigators of corruption crimes. This issue has emerged long before the Corruption Eradication Commission was established, especially after the Criminal Procedure Code was enacted, and the debate continues to this day.
Tantangan Penegakan Hukum dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Terorisme di Indonesia Servasius Edwin Telaumbanua; Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih; Bonar Yudhistira; Elisabeth Saragih; Tengku Ikhsan Ansyari Husni
Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Juli : Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/humif.v2i3.1772

Abstract

Terrorism is an extraordinary crime that poses a serious threat to both national and international security. Law enforcement efforts against such crimes face complex challenges, particularly in the evidentiary process. The process of proving terrorism-related offenses involves not only formal legal procedures but also substantive aspects, including the role of intelligence, the use of information technology, and the protection of human rights. This study aims to comprehensively examine the obstacles encountered by law enforcement authorities in proving acts of terrorism and to propose normative and practical solutions based on the development of national criminal law. The research employs a normative juridical approach, utilizing secondary data sourced from legislation, legal literature, and scholarly journals. The findings highlight the need for a reformulation of evidentiary approaches that are more adaptive to modern terrorism modus operandi, as well as the importance of enhancing cross-sectoral and international cooperation in the enforcement of anti-terrorism laws in Indonesia.
Tantangan Penegakan Hukum Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Terorisme di Indonesia Servasius Edwin Telaumbanua; Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih; Bonar Yudhistira; Elisabeth Saragih; Tengku Ikhsan Ansyari Husni
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 3 No 3 (2025): 2025
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v3i3.1372

Abstract

Tindak pidana terorisme merupakan kejahatan luar biasa (extraordinary crime) yang mengancam stabilitas keamanan nasional dan internasional. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji secara komprehensif hambatan-hambatan yang dihadapi aparat penegak hukum dalam membuktikan tindak pidana terorisme serta menawarkan solusi normatif dan praktis berdasarkan perkembangan hukum pidana nasional. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan undang-undang, konseptual, kasus, dan perbandingan, melalui pengolahan data sekunder dari peraturan perundang-undangan, literatur hukum, dan jurnal ilmiah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pembuktian tindak pidana terorisme mengalami kendala serius, terutama terkait legitimasi alat bukti elektronik, rekam jejak digital, dan laporan intelijen yang belum sepenuhnya diakomodasi dalam sistem hukum acara pidana. Selain itu, pendekatan represif yang selama ini digunakan dinilai belum cukup efektif tanpa diimbangi program deradikalisasi dan model keadilan restoratif. Implikasi dari temuan ini menekankan pentingnya reformulasi sistem pembuktian yang adaptif terhadap kejahatan terorisme modern, penguatan kapasitas aparat penegak hukum, serta peningkatan kerja sama lintas sektor dan internasional untuk mendukung efektivitas penegakan hukum
Co-Authors Elisabeth Saragih Erwin Efendi Rangkuti fauzan Fauzan Ismaidar I, Ismaidar Servasius Edwin Telaumbanua Tengku Ikhsan Ansyari Husni Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih Yulia Christy Shintara Aruan