Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Mutiara: Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice
Elisabeth Saragih
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Tantangan Penegakan Hukum dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Terorisme di Indonesia Servasius Edwin Telaumbanua; Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih; Bonar Yudhistira; Elisabeth Saragih; Tengku Ikhsan Ansyari Husni
Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Juli : Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/humif.v2i3.1772

Abstract

Terrorism is an extraordinary crime that poses a serious threat to both national and international security. Law enforcement efforts against such crimes face complex challenges, particularly in the evidentiary process. The process of proving terrorism-related offenses involves not only formal legal procedures but also substantive aspects, including the role of intelligence, the use of information technology, and the protection of human rights. This study aims to comprehensively examine the obstacles encountered by law enforcement authorities in proving acts of terrorism and to propose normative and practical solutions based on the development of national criminal law. The research employs a normative juridical approach, utilizing secondary data sourced from legislation, legal literature, and scholarly journals. The findings highlight the need for a reformulation of evidentiary approaches that are more adaptive to modern terrorism modus operandi, as well as the importance of enhancing cross-sectoral and international cooperation in the enforcement of anti-terrorism laws in Indonesia.
A Comparative Study of Corporate Criminal Liability Systems in Indonesia and the United States Ismaidar Ismaidar; Azhar AR; Servasius Edwin Telaumbanua; Rudi Salam Tarigan; Ansori Maulana; Restika Ndruru; Zeno Eronu Zalukhu; Lasma Sinambela; Haris Putra Utama Limbong; Elisabeth Saragih; Robby Yusuf S Sembiring; Mus Mulyadi; Zahrana Syavica; Tengku Muhammad Reza Fikri Dharmawan; Muhammad Faiz Hadi; Ibrahim Ibrahim; Erwin Efendi Rangkuti; T. Ikhsan Ansyari Husny; Netty br Siahaan; Andi Gultom; Yoldy Israq; Putriani Nduru; Yulia Christy Shintara Aruan; Christine Natalia Pangaribuan
Mutiara : Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Juni : Mutiara : Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah
Publisher : STAI YPIQ BAUBAU, SULAWESI TENGGARA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59059/mutiara.v3i3.2268

Abstract

Corporate criminal liability has become a pivotal issue in modern criminal law, particularly in response to the increasing prevalence of crimes committed by legal entities. This article provides a comparative analysis of the corporate criminal liability systems in Indonesia and the United States, focusing on the legal foundations, models of liability, and enforcement practices. The United States adopts the principle of vicarious liability, allowing corporations to be held accountable for the acts of their employees performed within the scope of employment. In contrast, Indonesia employs a more fragmented approach through sectoral laws, without a unified criminal liability doctrine for corporations. The study reveals that while Indonesia has begun to recognize corporate liability, it still faces significant challenges in legal harmonization and effective enforcement. This comparison aims to contribute to the development of a more comprehensive and adaptive corporate criminal liability system in Indonesia, in line with international best practices.
Tantangan Penegakan Hukum Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Terorisme di Indonesia Servasius Edwin Telaumbanua; Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih; Bonar Yudhistira; Elisabeth Saragih; Tengku Ikhsan Ansyari Husni
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 3 No 3 (2025): 2025
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v3i3.1372

Abstract

Tindak pidana terorisme merupakan kejahatan luar biasa (extraordinary crime) yang mengancam stabilitas keamanan nasional dan internasional. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji secara komprehensif hambatan-hambatan yang dihadapi aparat penegak hukum dalam membuktikan tindak pidana terorisme serta menawarkan solusi normatif dan praktis berdasarkan perkembangan hukum pidana nasional. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan undang-undang, konseptual, kasus, dan perbandingan, melalui pengolahan data sekunder dari peraturan perundang-undangan, literatur hukum, dan jurnal ilmiah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pembuktian tindak pidana terorisme mengalami kendala serius, terutama terkait legitimasi alat bukti elektronik, rekam jejak digital, dan laporan intelijen yang belum sepenuhnya diakomodasi dalam sistem hukum acara pidana. Selain itu, pendekatan represif yang selama ini digunakan dinilai belum cukup efektif tanpa diimbangi program deradikalisasi dan model keadilan restoratif. Implikasi dari temuan ini menekankan pentingnya reformulasi sistem pembuktian yang adaptif terhadap kejahatan terorisme modern, penguatan kapasitas aparat penegak hukum, serta peningkatan kerja sama lintas sektor dan internasional untuk mendukung efektivitas penegakan hukum
Effectiveness Implementation Law Protection Consumers : Case Study of Consumer Disputes in Indonesia Elisabeth Saragih; Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih; MH Fauzan; Lasma Sinambela; Kaaisar Romolus Deo Sianipar
International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): December : International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijlcj.v1i4.300

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of consumer protection law implementation in Indonesia, particularly through a case study approach on disputes between consumers and business actors. The research employs a qualitative method with normative and empirical juridical approaches. Data were obtained from legal documents, case reports, and interviews with relevant stakeholders. The findings reveal that although consumer protection regulations are comprehensive, their implementation faces challenges, such as low public legal awareness, weak law enforcement, and insufficient support from consumer protection institutions. This study recommend strengthening legal education, increasing the capacity of relevant institutions, and simplifying dispute resolution mechanisms.
Co-Authors Andi Gultom Ansori Maulana Azhar AR Bonar Yudhistira Christine Natalia Pangaribuan Erwin Efendi Rangkuti Haris Putra Utama Limbong Ibrahim Ibrahim Ismaidar I, Ismaidar Kaaisar Romolus Deo Sianipar Lasma Sinambela MH Fauzan Muhammad Faiz Hadi Mus Mulyadi Netty br Siahaan Putriani Nduru Restika Ndruru Robby Yusuf S Sembiring Rudi Salam Tarigan Servasius Edwin Telaumbanua T. Ikhsan Ansyari Husny Tengku Ikhsan Ansyari Husni Tengku Muhammad Reza Fikri Dharmawan Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih Yoldy Israq Yulia Christy Shintara Aruan Zahrana Syavica Zeno Eronu Zalukhu