Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

A Study of the Provisions for Dispute Resolution in the Health Sector through Mediation and Arbitration in Indonesia Jafar Sidik; Dewi Sulistianingsih; Asep Rozali; Deni Haspada; Edi Pramono
The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): September
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/iccle.v6i3.11571

Abstract

One of the ideals of the Indonesia nation is to advance general welfare. Health is a human right as one of the elements of general welfare, which must be realized. Legal relations in the health sector are not always harmonious, therefore it is necessary to have a way or mechanism to resolve disputes or disputes or differences of opinion between related parties, such as the relationship between health facilities in the form of hospitals or clinics and doctors, doctors, or other related parties. The political direction of Indonesia's law regarding dispute resolution can be carried out through state judicial institutions or resolved outside the state courts. The purpose and purpose of this article is to know, describe and analyze positive legal provisions related to dispute resolution in the health sector. This study uses research methods with juridical-normative and descriptive-analytical approaches, using library research. The results of this study show that the provisions in the Health Law have accommodated efforts to resolve disputes outside the court by using arbitration and mediation. However, there is still a need for health mediation institutions at the district level so that there are institutions available to resolve disputes in the health sector.
Politik Hukum Arbitrase Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia: Analisis Kritis Terhadap Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang Tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Diding Jalaludin; Muhamad Kholid; Tatang Astarudin; Asep Rozali
Iqtishaduna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Januari
Publisher : Jurusan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Uin Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/iqtishaduna.v7i2.65142

Abstract

Abstrak          Penelitian ini mengeksplorasi dan mengkaji secara kritis politik hukum RUU tentang perubahan UU No. 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa dengan menelaah naskah akademik RUU dan membandingkannya dengan kondisi normatif dan praktik penyelesaian sengketa melalui arbitrase di Indonesia guna memberikan kontribusi terhadap RUU tersebut dalam mengatasi problematika aktual. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dan analisis kualitatif terhadap berbagai literatur mutakhir dari bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan politik hukum dalam RUU perubahan UU No. 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa merupakan peluang strategis untuk memperbaiki sistem arbitrase Indonesia, namun harus dilakukan secara cermat dengan mengakomodir berbagai aspek seperti keadilan, kepastian hukum, konflik norma, arbitrase syariah, arbitrase internasional, dan penyelarasan dengan disrupsi teknologi (e-arbitration). Kata kunci: Politik Hukum, Arbitrase, Naskah Akademik RUU Arbitrase dan APS   Abstract This research explores and critically examines the legal policy of the draft bill on amendments to Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution by reviewing the academic text of the draft bill and comparing it with the normative conditions and practices of dispute resolution through arbitration in Indonesia in order to contribute to the draft bill in addressing current issues. This research uses a normative juridical approach and qualitative analysis of various recent literature from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. The results of this study indicate that the legal policy in the draft amendment to Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution is a strategic opportunity to improve the Indonesian arbitration system. but it must be done carefully by accommodating various aspects such as fairness, legal certainty, conflict of norms, sharia arbitration, international arbitration, and alignment with technological disruption (e-arbitration). Keywords: Legal Policy, Arbitration, Academic Papers on Arbitration Bill and APS